Greenville Triumph and Chattanooga Red Wolves are both thriving in the USL League One with their 3rd and 2nd places respectively. Let's hope for a fun game!
- Greenville Triumph have played more matches over 2,5 goals home than away.
- Chattanooga Red Wolves have the most points from losing position (14) in USL League One
Both teams have had enough days rest since their previous effort on the pitch. Let's trust this will be an energetic fixture!
It's quite the trip for Chattanooga Red Wolves when visiting Greenville as the cities are 1600 kilometers apart.
Greenville Triumph form and stats
6-4-3 (win-draw-lost) are the USL League One numbers at home for Greenville Triumph so far this season. The opportunity of a proper winning streak is there for the hosts, with two straight wins here at Legacy Early College.
Greenville are confident in defense, having played 339 minutes without conceding a goal in the league.
The Greenville supporters enjoyed the previous match, watching their team host New England II in USL League One and win 1-0.
In the preceding match a 1-0 victory visiting Union Omaha.Greenville have proved capable of finding the net in their games here at Legacy Early College with 21 goals in 13 league matches. 15 goals have been conceded.
Chattanooga Red Wolves form and stats
Playing away, Chattanooga Red Wolves have won 4 games, drawn 5 and suffered 3 defeats in the USL League One this season.
Chattanooga's previous game was their home loss versus Toronto II (1-2).
Preceding that game was the away victory against North Carolina with the score of 3-2.Chattanooga are scoring more than one goal per away game on average, having accumulated 15 away goals from 12 games (in the league). Chattanooga have conceded 12 goals in these away matches.
Head 2 Head
Greenville Triumph - Chattanooga Red Wolves 1-0 was the result in these sides' previous head to head fixture, earlier this season. Head-to-head numbers (for the prior eight meetings): Greenville Triumph won four games, two matches ended with a tie and Chattanooga Red Wolves got two wins. Over 2,5 goals / under 2,5 goals: one / sevenGreenville Triumph missing players
Chattanooga Red Wolves missing players
| Greenville Triumph | Chattanooga Red Wolves | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 26 | 13 | 2 | Played | P | 2 | 12 | 26 |
| 11 | 6 | 0 | Won | W | 0 | 4 | 11 |
| 8 | 4 | 1 | Drew | D | 1 | 5 | 10 |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | Lost | L | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| 34 | 21 | 1 | Scored | S | 1 | 15 | 36 |
| 29 | 15 | 3 | Conceded | C | 2 | 12 | 27 |
| 92% | 92% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 83% | 92% |
| 69% | 69% | 100% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 50% | 50% | 65% |
| 46% | 54% | 0% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 0% | 33% | 42% |
| 23% | 38% | 0% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 0% | 33% | 27% |
| 8% | 15% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 25% | 15% |
| 46% | 46% | 50% | BTTS | BTTS | 50% | 50% | 65% |
| 42% | 46% | 0% | Clean Sheets | C S | 0% | 25% | 19% |
| 19% | 15% | 50% | Failed to Score | F T | 50% | 42% | 23% |
| 5.1 | 5.6 | 4.5 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 6 | 5.3 | 5.8 |
| 3.7 | 2.9 | 1.5 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 2.5 | 4 | 3.2 |
| 1.9 | 1.7 | 1.5 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 3.5 | 2.4 | 2.7 |
| 4 | 2 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 9.2 | 10.9 | 11 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 5.5 | 11.5 | 10 |
| 3.6 | 5 | 4 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 2 | 5.4 | 4.4 |
| 37% | 35% | 12% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 25% | 28% | 34% |
- Chattanooga Red Wolves have the most points from losing position (14) in USL League One
- Chattanooga Red Wolves have the most scored goals in the second half (24) in USL League One
- Greenville Triumph have played more matches over 2,5 goals home than away.
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Union Omaha | 25 | 13 | 8 | 4 | 40 | 19 | 12 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 20 | 10 | 13 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 20 | 9 | 21 | 47 |
| 2 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 26 | 11 | 10 | 5 | 36 | 27 | 14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 21 | 15 | 12 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 15 | 12 | 9 | 43 |
| 3 | Greenville Triumph | 26 | 11 | 8 | 7 | 34 | 29 | 13 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 21 | 15 | 13 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 13 | 14 | 5 | 41 |
| 4 | Richmond Kickers | 26 | 11 | 7 | 8 | 33 | 30 | 14 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 19 | 11 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 14 | 19 | 3 | 40 |
| 5 | New England II | 26 | 11 | 4 | 11 | 32 | 34 | 14 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 18 | 13 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 14 | 21 | -2 | 37 |
| 6 | Tucson | 26 | 10 | 6 | 10 | 38 | 38 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 19 | 19 | 13 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 36 |
| 7 | Toronto II | 26 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 32 | 30 | 12 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 16 | 9 | 14 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 16 | 21 | 2 | 35 |
| 8 | North Texas | 25 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 34 | 30 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 23 | 12 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 11 | 18 | 4 | 33 |
| 9 | Tormenta | 27 | 8 | 6 | 13 | 36 | 46 | 14 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 17 | 20 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 19 | 26 | -10 | 30 |
| 10 | Forward Madison | 25 | 6 | 11 | 8 | 26 | 30 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 13 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 14 | 20 | -4 | 29 |
| 11 | Inter Miami II | 26 | 7 | 7 | 12 | 38 | 47 | 13 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 23 | 23 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 15 | 24 | -9 | 28 |
| 12 | North Carolina | 26 | 6 | 4 | 16 | 29 | 48 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 19 | 23 | 14 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 10 | 25 | -19 | 22 |