All you need to know about the USL League One match Richmond Kickers - Chattanooga Red Wolves!
- Richmond Kickers have the fewest scored goals in the first half (10) in USL League One
- Chattanooga Red Wolves have the most points from losing position (11) in USL League One
This could be an engrossing fixture with lots of fun and excitement as both participants are well revitalized since they last ran out on the pitch. Let's start!
One slightly interesting match fact is that this game is played on grass and that the visiting Chattanooga Red Wolves have a different surface at their stadium (artifical turf). The impact of this is hard to measure exactly, but the visitors stats on grass is 4-6-8 (win-draw-loss) from 18 matches.
Everyone involved with the away team has to get their travel gear ready for this match as there's a whopping 800 kilometers to cover before arriving at the match.
Richmond Kickers form and stats
Richmond Kickers have collected 20 points from their USL League One home games so far after 5-5-1. The Richmond fans aren't used to losing league-games here at City Stadium and will expect new points from this game. Richmond Kickers has played ten games in a row here without a defeat.
The Richmond Kickers supporters enjoyed the previous match, watching their team host Toronto II in USL League One and win 1-0. Some amazing scenes last match, when E. Terzaghi scored the winning goal three minutes into stoppage time.
A defeat was the result before that one, 1-3 away at New England II.Another home game is coming up fairly shortly for the hosts, as Forward Madison are coming to town in four days.
The Richmond fans would probably like to see some more goals scored at their own stadium in the league, the tally being 14 in 11 matches. From these home matches, Richmond Kickers have conceded only 9 goals.
Chattanooga Red Wolves form and stats
3-5-2 is the win-draw-loss statistic for Chattanooga Red Wolves in their USL League One matches away.
Chattanooga's previous game was their home loss versus New England II (0-1). Chattanooga Red Wolves were so close to getting something from the game against New England II, but ended up with egg all over their face after conceding the deciding goal six minutes into overtime.
Prior to that match, a home win 3-1 against North Carolina.Chattanooga are scoring more than one goal per away game on average, having accumulated 12 away goals from 10 games (in the league). It's been trouble in front of goal recently, as only 0 of these goals has been scored in their last three away matches. They concede less than a goal on average per away game (9 so far). There's been improvement defensively lately, as only 1 of these goals has been conceded in their last 3 away matches.
Head 2 Head
This was the end result when the contenders met previously this season; Chattanooga Red Wolves - Richmond 2-1. Head to head data (for the last seven meetings): Richmond won one game, zero matches ended in a draw and Chattanooga Red Wolves managed six wins. Over 2,5 goals / under 2,5 goals: four / threeTop Goalscorers
  E. Terzaghi 13 goals |  J. Galindrez Mosquera 9 goals | J. Bolanos 4 goals |
Richmond Kickers missing players
Chattanooga Red Wolves missing players
| Richmond Kickers | Chattanooga Red Wolves | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 22 | 11 | 3 | Played | P | 2 | 10 | 23 |
| 7 | 5 | 1 | Won | W | 0 | 3 | 10 |
| 7 | 5 | 1 | Drew | D | 1 | 5 | 10 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | Lost | L | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 26 | 14 | 2 | Scored | S | 2 | 12 | 32 |
| 27 | 9 | 2 | Conceded | C | 3 | 9 | 22 |
| 86% | 82% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 80% | 91% |
| 68% | 55% | 33% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 50% | 50% | 65% |
| 50% | 27% | 0% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 50% | 30% | 39% |
| 27% | 27% | 0% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 50% | 30% | 26% |
| 9% | 18% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 20% | 13% |
| 50% | 45% | 33% | BTTS | BTTS | 50% | 50% | 65% |
| 36% | 45% | 33% | Clean Sheets | C S | 0% | 30% | 22% |
| 27% | 27% | 33% | Failed to Score | F T | 50% | 40% | 22% |
| 4.5 | 5 | 4.3 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 5 | 4.8 | 5.6 |
| 4.8 | 4.9 | 5 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 5 | 4 | 3.3 |
| 2.7 | 3 | 3.3 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2 | 2.4 | 2.8 |
| 3 | 1 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 8 | 9.1 | 4.3 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 5 | 12.4 | 10.1 |
| 3.3 | 3.5 | 1.3 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 4 | 5.4 | 4.2 |
| 36% | 36% | 50% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 50% | 28% | 36% |
- Chattanooga Red Wolves have the most points from losing position (11) in USL League One
- Chattanooga Red Wolves have the most scored goals in the second half (21) in USL League One
- Richmond Kickers have the fewest matches over the total-line (5) in USL League One
- Richmond Kickers have the fewest scored goals in the first half (10) in USL League One
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 23 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 32 | 22 | 13 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 20 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 10 | 40 |
| 2 | Union Omaha | 21 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 28 | 16 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 12 | 7 | 12 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 16 | 9 | 12 | 38 |
| 3 | Tucson | 23 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 35 | 33 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 14 | 13 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 19 | 19 | 2 | 33 |
| 4 | Greenville Triumph | 23 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 31 | 29 | 11 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 19 | 15 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 12 | 14 | 2 | 32 |
| 5 | New England II | 22 | 9 | 4 | 9 | 30 | 32 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 14 | 19 | -2 | 31 |
| 6 | Forward Madison | 21 | 6 | 11 | 4 | 24 | 24 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 12 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 12 | 14 | 0 | 29 |
| 7 | Tormenta | 24 | 8 | 5 | 11 | 31 | 35 | 13 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 17 | 16 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 14 | 19 | -4 | 29 |
| 8 | Richmond Kickers | 22 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 26 | 27 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 12 | 18 | -1 | 28 |
| 9 | North Texas | 22 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 30 | 28 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 22 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 18 | 2 | 27 |
| 10 | Inter Miami II | 23 | 7 | 6 | 10 | 33 | 38 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 19 | 19 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 14 | 19 | -5 | 27 |
| 11 | Toronto II | 23 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 26 | 29 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 12 | 9 | 13 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 14 | 20 | -3 | 26 |
| 12 | North Carolina | 21 | 5 | 4 | 12 | 24 | 37 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 17 | 19 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 18 | -13 | 19 |