The USL League One league table might not tell the truth so early on, but it's the best truth we have so far. Chattanooga Red Wolves and Richmond Kickers are placed 5th and 4th respectively.
Both teams have had enough rest since their last competitive action. Let's hope for an energetic game!
This pitch has artifical turf, which is not Richmond Kickers's usual surface at their own ground. When playing on artifical turf Richmond Kickers have performed like this: Played eleven matches resulting in 3 wins, 1 draw and 7 defeats with the goal stats 11-18 (scored/conceded).
These teams have little in common geographically as Richmond Kickers have to travel 800 kilometers to reach their opponents. The trip home will be especially long if the match ends in defeat.
Chattanooga Red Wolves form and stats
The hosts won their first USL League One game here, lifting spirits. Home statistics for Chattanooga Red Wolves last season were 4 wins, 1 draw and 3 losses from 8 games.
Chattanooga Red Wolves's last game was hosting Inter Miami II (placed 3rd) and winning 2-1. A late climax in the match against Inter Miami II as the winning goal came four minutes into overtime; scored by J. Ramos.
2-2 away at New England II before that.Chattanooga Red Wolves has scored 2 goals so far and conceded 1 goal from 1 home game. These are numbers from the league only.
Richmond Kickers form and stats
Things could have gone better for Richmond Kickers in their USL League One away matches, but 3 points from 2 games is all right.
Did you know that the longest clean sheet streak is 1816 minutes? This record is held by Mazaropi when he played in Vasco da Gama. Richmond Kickers goalkeeper Akira Fitzgerald is eager to challenge this, with his 187 minutes of keeping balls out from the net.
Richmond Kickers delivered a 0-0 draw playing at home against North Carolina (placed 11th) in their previous match; a USL League One game.
That result followed a home victory 2-0 versus Tormenta.Richmond Kickers have the goal stats of 4-2 (for/against) from 2 business trips in the league at this early stage of the season.
Head 2 Head
Last six meetings between the teams: Chattanooga won five, Richmond Kickers won one and zero draws. three games with over 2,5 goals, three matches with two goals or less.Top Goalscorers
  E. Terzaghi 2 goals |  J. Ramos 1 goals | J. Bolanos 1 goals |
Chattanooga Red Wolves missing players
Richmond Kickers missing players
| Chattanooga Red Wolves | Richmond Kickers | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | Played | P | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | Won | W | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | Drew | D | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Lost | L | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | Scored | S | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | Conceded | C | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| 100% | 100% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 80% |
| 67% | 100% | 100% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 100% | 100% | 60% |
| 67% | 100% | 100% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 100% | 100% | 40% |
| 33% | 0% | 0% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 67% | 100% | 100% | BTTS | BTTS | 0% | 50% | 20% |
| 33% | 0% | 0% | Clean Sheets | C S | 100% | 50% | 60% |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Failed to Score | F T | 0% | 0% | 40% |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1.7 | 2 | 2 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2 | 1.5 | 2.2 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8.7 | 7 | 7 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 7 | 9.5 | 9.8 |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 5 | 4.5 | 3.2 |
| 42% | 100% | 100% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 60% | 44% | 38% |
| Chattanooga Red Wolves | Last season | Richmond Kickers | |||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 15 | 8 | Played | P | 8 | 16 | ||
| 6 | 4 | Won | W | 3 | 8 | ||
| 4 | 1 | Drew | D | 2 | 2 | ||
| 5 | 3 | Lost | L | 3 | 6 | ||
| 21 | 12 | Scored | S | 12 | 22 | ||
| 17 | 8 | Conceded | C | 11 | 22 | ||
| 100% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 88% | 94% | ||
| 73% | 75% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 75% | 75% | ||
| 53% | 50% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 75% | 75% | ||
| 27% | 25% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 38% | 25% | ||
| 0% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 12% | 6% | ||
| 60% | 50% | BTTS | BTTS | 75% | 69% | ||
| 20% | 38% | Clean Sheets | C S | 25% | 19% | ||
| 20% | 12% | Failed to Score | F T | 12% | 19% | ||
| 0 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2.3 | 3.2 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 1.2 | 1.4 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 1 | ||
| 7.4 | 8.6 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 9.9 | 8 | ||
| 3.9 | 3.9 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 4.6 | 3.5 | ||
| 36% | 39% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 32% | 39% | ||
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Greenville Triumph | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 13 |
| 2 | Union Omaha | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 10 |
| 3 | Inter Miami II | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 9 |
| 4 | Richmond Kickers | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| 5 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| 6 | North Texas | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | -3 | 6 |
| 7 | Forward Madison | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 8 | New England II | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -3 | 4 |
| 9 | Toronto II | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 10 | Tormenta | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6 | -5 | 3 |
| 11 | North Carolina | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 1 |
| 12 | Tucson | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 1 |