Chattanooga Red Wolves welcome Inter Miami II for another interesting USL League One fixture here.
We should expect both teams to be fresh and ready for this match, as there is some time since both teams last played. Let's have a look at how the teams are doing!
Chattanooga Red Wolves form and stats
Chattanooga Red Wolves travelled for their previous game, a trip to New England II that ended 2-2. Chattanooga Red Wolves salvaged the draw from a difficult situation against New England II, trailing 0-2 at one point. Not giving up resulted in A. Espana equalizing. No victory last time out for Chattanooga Red Wolves, but the draw 2-2 felt nice for A. Espana who came on as a substitute in the 56th minute and scored two goals.
Before that match, a win away at North Texas.Inter Miami II form and stats
Inter Miami II are doing rather OK so far in their away games in the USL League One, having played 2 games and collected 3 points (1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss).
Inter go into this game after a win, the home game against Tucson that ended 5-1. As mentioned above, Inter Miami II was the only team on the pitch versus Tucson in their previous game, winning 5-1. This could be a tougher task.
Preceding that, the 0-2 home loss versus Union Omaha.As for goals scored and conceded in the league games away so far, Inter Miami II has managed 3 goals and let in 4 from 2 matches.
Head 2 Head
Top Goalscorers
  C. Young 1 goals |
Chattanooga Red Wolves missing players
Inter Miami II missing players
| Chattanooga Red Wolves | Inter Miami II | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | Played | P | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | Won | W | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | Drew | D | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Lost | L | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | Scored | S | 2 | 3 | 10 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | Conceded | C | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| 100% | 0% | 0% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 50% | 0% | 0% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 100% | 50% | 67% |
| 50% | 0% | 0% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 100% | 50% | 50% |
| 50% | 0% | 0% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 100% | 50% | 33% |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 100% | 50% | 33% |
| 50% | 0% | 0% | BTTS | BTTS | 100% | 50% | 50% |
| 50% | 0% | 0% | Clean Sheets | C S | 0% | 50% | 17% |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Failed to Score | F T | 0% | 0% | 33% |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1.5 | 0 | 0 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 1 | 1 | 1.4 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9.5 | 0 | 0 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 9 | 8 | 10.4 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 4 | 3 | 4.2 |
| 30% | 0% | 0% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 50% | 50% | 48% |
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Greenville Triumph | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 10 |
| 2 | Union Omaha | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 10 |
| 3 | Inter Miami II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 9 |
| 4 | Richmond Kickers | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| 5 | North Texas | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -2 | 6 |
| 6 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 7 | Forward Madison | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 8 | New England II | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -3 | 4 |
| 9 | Tormenta | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6 | -4 | 3 |
| 10 | Tucson | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 1 |
| 11 | Toronto II | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | North Carolina | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |