Miami FC II have journeyed here for an intriguing battle versus the hosts Tampa Bay Rowdies. Read up on the game with this in-depth USL Championship preview!
- All of Tampa Bay Rowdies's matches have had more than 1,5 goals.
- Miami FC II have the most dropped points from leading position (6) in USL Championship
It's no vacation for neither Rowdies nor Miami FC II as both were in action only a few days ago. Expect some tired legs on the pitch and/or possibly some changes to the lineups.
Tampa Bay Rowdies form and stats
The story so far in the USL Championship for Tampa Bay Rowdies at their home stadium (Al Lang Stadium) is 1 win, 1 draw and 1 defeat.
Tampa Bay Rowdies's last game was hosting Miami FC II (placed 10th) and winning 2-0. At last, a league victory after four games without one.
A win at home ahead of that game, as expected. The team were solid favourites against Nona and won 2-0. The hosts are modest favourites in this match, with the bookmakers estimating the chance of a home win at about 50% +- five percent. It's interesting to look at how Tampa Bay Rowdies have performed under similar circumstances, so here are some numbers: When modest favourites like this (we found 11 games) they have won 9 times, drawn 1 and lost 1.
At Al Lang Stadium, Tampa Bay Rowdies has the goal stats of 3-3 (for/against) from 3 league fixtures.
Miami FC II form and stats
The USL Championship season is young and Miami FC II have only just started going through their travel schedule, with 2 away games done and still no victory. 1 draw and 1 defeat so far.
Miami FC II play their second straight away game, having lost the previous one 0-2 to Tampa Bay Rowdies (placed 7th).
A home victory as expected against Jacksonville Armada II ahead of that, in the US Open Cup. Miami are the outsiders in this one, but not by much. Their performance in similar games (being the away team and moderate outsiders) is 2 wins, 3 draws and 6 defeats. From a total of 11 matches.
Few goals? 5 league matches in a row with this club have had zero, one or two goals.
As for goals scored and conceded in the league games away so far, Miami FC II has managed {1 goals} and let in 3 from 2 matches.
Head 2 Head
This duo met each other before this season: Tampa Bay Rowdies - Miami FC II 2-0. Head-2-head stats last ten meetings: seven - zero - three (Tampa Bay Rowdies wins - draws - Miami FC II wins). As for goals, seven matches ended with three or more goals (over 2,5), three had two or less.
Top Goalscorers
  J. Areman 1 goals |  C. Jennings 1 goals | F. Schröter 1 goals |
Tampa Bay Rowdies missing players
Miami FC II missing players
| Tampa Bay Rowdies | Miami FC II | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 5 | 3 | 0 | Played | P | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | Won | W | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | Drew | D | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | Lost | L | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 4 | 3 | 0 | Scored | S | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 7 | 3 | 0 | Conceded | C | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| 100% | 100% | 0% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 100% | 100% | 0% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 100% | 100% | 80% |
| 20% | 0% | 0% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 40% | 33% | 0% | BTTS | BTTS | 100% | 50% | 60% |
| 20% | 33% | 0% | Clean Sheets | C S | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 40% | 33% | 0% | Failed to Score | F T | 0% | 50% | 40% |
| 4 | 3.3 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 3 | 1.5 | 3.8 |
| 4.8 | 3.7 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 8 | 5.5 | 5.6 |
| 2.6 | 3.7 | 0 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 1 | 2 | 2.4 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9.8 | 10.3 | 0 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 3 | 6.5 | 8.8 |
| 2.2 | 2.3 | 0 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 2 | 2.5 | 3.4 |
| 36% | 43% | 0% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 50% | 20% | 18% |
| 10.4 | 9.7 | 0 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 11 | 11 | 10 |
| 4.6 | 4.3 | 0 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 2 | 3 | 3 |
- All of Miami FC II's away-matches have had more than 1,5 goals.
- All of Tampa Bay Rowdies's matches have had more than 1,5 goals.
- Miami FC II have conceded at least twice as many corners as they have won away.
- Miami FC II have failed to keep a clean sheet in all their matches.
- Miami FC II have the fewest matches over the total-line (0) in USL Championship
- Miami FC II have the fewest scored goals in the second half (0) in USL Championship
- Miami FC II have the most dropped points from leading position (6) in USL Championship
- Miami FC II have the most matches under the total-line (5) in USL Championship
- Miami FC II have won significantly less corners away then at home.
- Miami FC II have yet to win a game.
- Miami FC II haven’t played a single 0-0 game.
- Tampa Bay Rowdies haven’t played a single 0-0 game.
| Tampa Bay Rowdies | Last season | Miami FC II | |||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 37 | 18 | Played | P | 18 | 35 | ||
| 22 | 13 | Won | W | 10 | 15 | ||
| 7 | 3 | Drew | D | 3 | 10 | ||
| 8 | 2 | Lost | L | 5 | 10 | ||
| 77 | 44 | Scored | S | 30 | 48 | ||
| 35 | 14 | Conceded | C | 17 | 35 | ||
| 97% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 83% | 86% | ||
| 73% | 78% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 67% | 69% | ||
| 51% | 50% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 50% | 43% | ||
| 41% | 50% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 28% | 23% | ||
| 19% | 17% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 17% | 9% | ||
| 62% | 61% | BTTS | BTTS | 39% | 46% | ||
| 24% | 33% | Clean Sheets | C S | 56% | 49% | ||
| 16% | 6% | Failed to Score | F T | 22% | 20% | ||
| 5.2 | 6.2 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 2.9 | 3.7 | ||
| 3.5 | 2.5 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 5.9 | 5.3 | ||
| 1.9 | 1.8 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2.4 | 2.4 | ||
| 2 | 1 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | ||
| 9.8 | 10.5 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 8.4 | 9.7 | ||
| 4.7 | 4.9 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 4.2 | 4.6 | ||
| 45% | 51% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 40% | 30% | ||
| 7.6 | 5.8 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 10.4 | 9.8 | ||
| 2.7 | 2.3 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 4.3 | 4.1 | ||
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Birmingham Legion | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 10 |
| 2 | Louisville City | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -4 | 9 |
| 3 | Charleston Battery | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 8 |
| 4 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| 5 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| 6 | Indy Eleven | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -2 | 5 |
| 7 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 5 |
| 8 | Loudoun United | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -2 | 4 |
| 9 | Detroit City | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | -2 | 3 |
| 10 | Miami FC II | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | -3 | 3 |
| 11 | Hartford Athletic | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -4 | 2 |
| 12 | Memphis 901 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -4 | 1 |
