Pittsburgh Riverhounds receive Miami FC II for another appealing USL Championship fixture here at Highmark Stadium.
Both teams should be fairly well rested for this game, as they have had some quiet days to prepare. Hopefully this will translate into lots of action on the pitch.
Pittsburgh Riverhounds form and stats
Pittsburgh Riverhounds enjoyed a nice away win last time out, playing at Memphis 901's place. The match ended 3-1 with Lega scoring. What a game it was for Lega when beating Memphis 901, applying the finishing touch to three goals!
Before that, Riverhounds played out a draw 1-1 when visiting Birmingham Legion.The home team are moderate favourites in this game. How does Pittsburgh Riverhounds handle that role? We have found 9 games in our database similar to this one, based on the home odds. The stats for these games are 4 wins, 2 draws and 3 defeats.
Pittsburgh Riverhounds are traveling soon after this match as the USL Championship match at Tulsa Roughnecks awaits in four days.
Miami FC II form and stats
This game can not go any worse than the last one, the home defeat versus New Mexico United with 0-1 on the scoreboard.
Ahead of that game was the 1-1 draw at home against Tulsa Roughnecks.We have checked recent matches where Miami have had similar odds to win. Win-draw-lose statistics from those 10 games were 2 victories, 3 draws and 5 defeats.
Head 2 Head
Stats for the last six meetings between these two contenders are: two wins for Pittsburgh Riverhounds, two draws and two wins for Miami FC II. Over 2,5 goals: four times; under 2,5 goals: two games.
Top Goalscorers
![]() A. Dikwa Lega 3 goals | ![]() R. Mertz 1 goals | ![]() F. Valot 1 goals |
Pittsburgh Riverhounds missing players
Miami FC II missing players
| Pittsburgh Riverhounds | Miami FC II | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | Played | P | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | Won | W | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | Drew | D | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Lost | L | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | Scored | S | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | Conceded | C | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 100% | 0% | 0% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| 100% | 0% | 0% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 0% | 0% | 50% |
| 50% | 0% | 0% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 50% | 0% | 0% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 100% | 0% | 0% | BTTS | BTTS | 0% | 0% | 50% |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Clean Sheets | C S | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Failed to Score | F T | 0% | 0% | 50% |
| 4.5 | 0 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 0 | 0 | 5.5 |
| 1.5 | 0 | 0 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9.5 | 0 | 0 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 0 | 0 | 4.5 |
| 50% | 0% | 0% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 0% | 0% | 11% |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 0 | 0 | 7.5 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Pittsburgh Riverhounds | Last season | Miami FC II | |||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 36 | 17 | Played | P | 18 | 35 | ||
| 16 | 9 | Won | W | 10 | 15 | ||
| 11 | 5 | Drew | D | 3 | 10 | ||
| 9 | 3 | Lost | L | 5 | 10 | ||
| 54 | 25 | Scored | S | 30 | 48 | ||
| 42 | 15 | Conceded | C | 17 | 35 | ||
| 94% | 88% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 83% | 86% | ||
| 75% | 59% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 67% | 69% | ||
| 50% | 35% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 50% | 43% | ||
| 28% | 29% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 28% | 23% | ||
| 8% | 12% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 17% | 9% | ||
| 53% | 41% | BTTS | BTTS | 39% | 46% | ||
| 31% | 47% | Clean Sheets | C S | 56% | 49% | ||
| 22% | 24% | Failed to Score | F T | 22% | 20% | ||
| 4.5 | 6 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 2.9 | 3.7 | ||
| 4.6 | 3.6 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 5.9 | 5.3 | ||
| 2.2 | 1.9 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2.4 | 2.4 | ||
| 3 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | ||
| 9.1 | 9.9 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 8.4 | 9.7 | ||
| 4.6 | 5.3 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 4.2 | 4.6 | ||
| 33% | 28% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 40% | 30% | ||
| 6.7 | 5.8 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 10.4 | 9.8 | ||
| 3.1 | 2.5 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 4.3 | 4.1 | ||
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Louisville City | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| 2 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| 3 | Loudoun United | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 4 | Birmingham Legion | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| 5 | Detroit City | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 6 | Charleston Battery | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 7 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| 8 | Indy Eleven | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 9 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 1 |
| 10 | Miami FC II | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 1 |
| 11 | Hartford Athletic | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 1 |
| 12 | Memphis 901 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -4 | 0 |
| Last season | Total | Home | Away | ||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Louisville City | 34 | 22 | 6 | 6 | 65 | 28 | 17 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 38 | 14 | 17 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 27 | 14 | 37 | 72 |
| 2 | Memphis 901 | 34 | 21 | 5 | 8 | 67 | 33 | 17 | 11 | 1 | 5 | 40 | 22 | 17 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 27 | 11 | 34 | 68 |
| 3 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 34 | 20 | 7 | 7 | 73 | 33 | 17 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 41 | 13 | 17 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 32 | 20 | 40 | 67 |
| 4 | Birmingham Legion | 34 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 56 | 37 | 17 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 29 | 15 | 17 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 27 | 22 | 19 | 58 |
| 5 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 34 | 16 | 9 | 9 | 50 | 38 | 17 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 25 | 15 | 17 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 25 | 23 | 12 | 57 |
| 6 | Miami FC II | 34 | 15 | 10 | 9 | 47 | 32 | 17 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 18 | 18 | 17 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 29 | 14 | 15 | 55 |
| 7 | Detroit City | 34 | 14 | 12 | 8 | 44 | 30 | 17 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 21 | 16 | 17 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 23 | 14 | 14 | 54 |
| 8 | Tulsa Roughnecks | 34 | 12 | 6 | 16 | 48 | 58 | 17 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 27 | 23 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 21 | 35 | -10 | 42 |
| 9 | Indy Eleven | 34 | 12 | 5 | 17 | 41 | 55 | 17 | 9 | 2 | 6 | 26 | 22 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 15 | 33 | -14 | 41 |
| 10 | Hartford Athletic | 34 | 10 | 6 | 18 | 47 | 57 | 17 | 7 | 1 | 9 | 28 | 28 | 17 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 19 | 29 | -10 | 36 |
| 11 | Loudoun United | 34 | 8 | 4 | 22 | 36 | 74 | 17 | 6 | 2 | 9 | 22 | 30 | 17 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 14 | 44 | -38 | 28 |
| 12 | Charleston Battery | 34 | 6 | 7 | 21 | 41 | 77 | 17 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 23 | 35 | 17 | 1 | 5 | 11 | 18 | 42 | -36 | 25 |
| 13 | Atlanta United II | 34 | 6 | 5 | 23 | 39 | 85 | 17 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 18 | 36 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 21 | 49 | -46 | 23 |
| 14 | New York RB II | 34 | 3 | 6 | 25 | 24 | 76 | 17 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 14 | 33 | 17 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 10 | 43 | -52 | 15 |