This season has been challenging for Chicago House so far, and you could say the same about Maryland Bobcats. These weathered teams eye some crucial points here.
- Chicago House have the fewest scored goals (9) in NISA
- Maryland Bobcats have the fewest scored goals (3) away in NISA
The hosts Chicago saw competitive action as recent as three days ago, playing in the NISA. Thankfully the previous game, versus Chattanooga, was also a home game here at SeatGeek Stadium. The away team is better rested.
Chicago House form and stats
The overall NISA results at home this season for Chicago House are 2-1-2 (wins-draws-losses). The opportunity of a proper winning streak is there for the hosts, with two straight wins here at SeatGeek Stadium.
A nice win for Chicago last time playing, versus Chattanooga. That was also a home game and the match ended 1-0.
Prior to that was the away defeat visiting Maryland Bobcats (1-2).The hosts are modest favourites in this match, with the bookmakers estimating the chance of a home win at about 50% +- five percent. It's interesting to look at how Chicago House have performed under similar circumstances, so here are some numbers: When modest favourites like this (we found one game) they have won one time, drawn zero and lost zero.
Chicago have scored 3 league goals here from 5 matches, not a lot. Chicago House's goalkeeper has had to pick the ball out of their own net 6 times. For more goal stats, check the Statistics tab above.
Maryland Bobcats form and stats
The hunting on away grounds haven’t been very fruitful for Maryland Bobcats so far with only 5 points returning home. The records show 1-2-4 (win-draw-lose).
Maryland won their last game, 2-1 versus Chicago House played at home.
A 0-4 defeat away at New Amsterdam before that.We have checked recent matches where Maryland have had similar odds to win. Win-draw-lose statistics from those five games were one victory, one draw and three defeats.
There's been a serious shortage of goals from Maryland's away games in the league this season with only 3 goals from 7 matches. Maryland Bobcats's defence is not exactly unbeatable as they have conceded 11 goals from these trips.
Head 2 Head
Maryland Bobcats - Chicago 2-1 was the end result in these squads' latest H2H fixture, played this season.Chicago House missing players
Maryland Bobcats missing players
| Chicago House | Maryland Bobcats | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 12 | 5 | 2 | Played | P | 2 | 7 | 13 |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | Won | W | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | Drew | D | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| 6 | 2 | 0 | Lost | L | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| 9 | 3 | 2 | Scored | S | 2 | 3 | 10 |
| 13 | 6 | 0 | Conceded | C | 6 | 11 | 21 |
| 92% | 100% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 71% | 85% |
| 42% | 40% | 0% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 100% | 43% | 62% |
| 25% | 20% | 0% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 100% | 43% | 54% |
| 17% | 20% | 0% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 50% | 29% | 31% |
| 8% | 0% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 50% | 14% | 8% |
| 25% | 20% | 0% | BTTS | BTTS | 50% | 14% | 38% |
| 42% | 40% | 100% | Clean Sheets | C S | 0% | 43% | 23% |
| 42% | 40% | 0% | Failed to Score | F T | 50% | 71% | 54% |
| 2.4 | 1.8 | 1.5 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 4.5 | 3.7 | 3.8 |
| 4.4 | 3 | 2 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 2.5 | 4.9 | 4.8 |
| 1.9 | 1.6 | 2 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 3 | 3 | 3.1 |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| 7.3 | 6.8 | 8 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 7.5 | 6 | 7.2 |
| 3.1 | 3.2 | 4 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 4 | 2.4 | 2.8 |
| 24% | 19% | 25% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 25% | 18% | 27% |
- Chicago House have the fewest matches over the total-line (3) in NISA
- Chicago House have the fewest points from losing position (0) in NISA
- Chicago House have the fewest scored goals (9) in NISA
- Chicago House have won significantly less corners at home than away.
- Chicago House haven’t played a single 0-0 game at home.
- Maryland Bobcats have conceded at least twice as many goals as they have scored.
- Maryland Bobcats have the fewest scored goals (3) away in NISA
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Detroit City | 13 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 26 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 4 | 18 | 32 |
| 2 | LA Force | 13 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 22 |
| 3 | California Utd Strikers | 12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 18 | 14 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 20 |
| 4 | Michigan Stars | 13 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 18 | 15 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 11 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 19 |
| 5 | Stumptown Athletic | 13 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 18 |
| 6 | New Amsterdam | 13 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 21 | 21 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 9 | 0 | 17 |
| 7 | Chicago House | 12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 9 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 7 | -4 | 14 |
| 8 | Maryland Bobcats | 13 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 21 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 11 | -11 | 12 |
| 9 | Chattanooga | 12 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 15 | 18 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 11 | -3 | 11 |
| 10 | San Diego 1904 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 13 | 25 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 14 | -12 | 7 |