Chattanooga are ready to blank out the league table ahead of this game against New Amsterdam. Here's all you should know pre-match!
- Chattanooga haven’t played a single 0-0 game.
- New Amsterdam have the most conceded goals in the first half (12) in NISA
Chattanooga have less rest than New Amsterdam in this fixture, as the hosts were involved in a NISA game only three days ago. That game was an away game at Chicago House, so at least Chattanooga are thankful to return home in this one. Game on!
Chattanooga form and stats
When playing at home in the NISA, Chattanooga have managed 2 wins, 1 draw and suffered 3 defeats from 6 games. Chattanooga has three losses from their three previous games and the tension is increasing in the dressing room for both the manager B. Elliott and the players.
The fans are hoping that Chattanooga will strike back in this match, putting things right after the 0-1 away loss in the NISA game against Chicago House (placed 7th).
Prior to that, an away loss at Michigan Stars.A decent goal production from Chattanooga in their home games so far, with 9 goals from 6 league matches. Chattanooga's goalkeeper has had to pick the ball out of their own net 7 times. For more goal stats, check the Statistics tab above.
New Amsterdam form and stats
3 wins, 1 draw and 3 losses. That’s the product of New Amsterdam playing as the away team in the NISA this season.
The Amsterdam goalkeeper is collecting clean sheets like a laundry worker. It's been 219 league minutes without conceding a goal, and counting.
It's another away game for the visitors, as they travelled to LA Force (placed 2nd) in their previous outing. The NISA match ended in a draw 0-0.
A home win before that, celebrating 4-0 vs Maryland Bobcats.The travelling fans enjoy New Amsterdam's attacking play in away games, having scored 12 goals in 7 league matches away. New Amsterdam have conceded 9 goals in these away matches.
Head 2 Head
Chattanooga and New Amsterdam have duelled earlier this season: New Amsterdam - Chattanooga 2-1. Head-2-head stats last four meetings: three - zero - one (Chattanooga wins - draws - New Amsterdam wins). As for goals, three matches ended with three or more goals (over 2,5), one had two or less.Chattanooga missing players
New Amsterdam missing players
| Chattanooga | New Amsterdam | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 12 | 6 | 1 | Played | P | 2 | 7 | 13 |
| 3 | 2 | 1 | Won | W | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | Drew | D | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 7 | 3 | 0 | Lost | L | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| 15 | 9 | 3 | Scored | S | 6 | 12 | 21 |
| 18 | 7 | 1 | Conceded | C | 1 | 9 | 21 |
| 100% | 100% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 86% | 92% |
| 83% | 83% | 100% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 100% | 71% | 85% |
| 67% | 67% | 100% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 100% | 71% | 69% |
| 25% | 17% | 100% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 50% | 43% | 38% |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 29% | 23% |
| 75% | 67% | 100% | BTTS | BTTS | 50% | 57% | 62% |
| 8% | 17% | 0% | Clean Sheets | C S | 50% | 29% | 23% |
| 17% | 17% | 0% | Failed to Score | F T | 0% | 29% | 23% |
| 5.4 | 5.8 | 6 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 3.5 | 3.7 | 4.4 |
| 4.3 | 4.5 | 3 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 4.5 | 4.9 | 4.5 |
| 2.3 | 2 | 1 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 3 | 2 | 2.2 |
| 3 | 1 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 7 | 8.2 | 8 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 13 | 9.9 | 9.1 |
| 3.3 | 3.7 | 5 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 6 | 4.1 | 3.5 |
| 38% | 41% | 60% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 50% | 41% | 47% |
- Chattanooga haven’t played a single 0-0 game.
- New Amsterdam have played more matches over 2,5 goals away than home.
- New Amsterdam have the fewest matches under the total-line (1) in NISA
- New Amsterdam have the most conceded goals in the first half (12) in NISA
- New Amsterdam have the most matches over the total-line (8) in NISA
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Detroit City | 13 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 26 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 4 | 18 | 32 |
| 2 | LA Force | 13 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 22 |
| 3 | California Utd Strikers | 12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 18 | 14 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 20 |
| 4 | Michigan Stars | 13 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 18 | 15 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 11 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 19 |
| 5 | Stumptown Athletic | 13 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 18 |
| 6 | New Amsterdam | 13 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 21 | 21 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 9 | 0 | 17 |
| 7 | Chicago House | 12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 9 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 7 | -4 | 14 |
| 8 | Maryland Bobcats | 13 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 21 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 11 | -11 | 12 |
| 9 | Chattanooga | 12 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 15 | 18 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 11 | -3 | 11 |
| 10 | San Diego 1904 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 13 | 25 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 14 | -12 | 7 |