A brief peek at the NISA table hint of an edge to LA Force when they travel to Chicago House. But; let's play before points are handed out!
- Chicago House have the fewest points from losing position (0) in NISA
- LA Force have won significantly less corners away then at home.
It's no vacation for neither Chicago nor LA Force as both were in action only a few days ago. Expect some tired legs on the pitch and/or possibly some changes to the lineups.
Chicago House form and stats
The total NISA stats at home this season for Chicago House are 2-1-3 (wins-draws-losses).
Chicago are hoping to put things right at home after a defeat in their previous match, the score 0-2 away versus Chattanooga.
In the game before, an away victory match versus New Amsterdam with a 2-1 scoreline.Chicago have scored 5 league goals here from 6 matches, not a lot. Defensively it’s touch-and-go for the home team as 11 goals have been conceded.
LA Force form and stats
Playing away, LA Force have won 4 games, drawn 3 and suffered 1 defeat in the NISA this season. Force love their trips these days, as their two previous away games have resulted in victories.
It's the second away game in a row for Force, but there's smiles all around after the 2-1 victory versus Maryland Bobcats (placed 6th) in the NISA last time out.
Prior to that result Force won their away game at Michigan Stars. The scoreline was 2-1.Force have a decent goal production going in their away games, although not fantastic. In 8 league away games 9 goals have been scored. It's not easy to score on Force as they have only conceded 6 goals from these away games.
Head 2 Head
The sides have faced each other previously this season, with the result LA Force - Chicago House 1-0 logged in the official records.Chicago House missing players
LA Force missing players
| Chicago House | LA Force | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 15 | 6 | 1 | Played | P | 3 | 8 | 16 |
| 5 | 2 | 0 | Won | W | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | Drew | D | 1 | 3 | 8 |
| 8 | 3 | 1 | Lost | L | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 13 | 5 | 0 | Scored | S | 4 | 9 | 19 |
| 21 | 11 | 1 | Conceded | C | 2 | 6 | 12 |
| 93% | 100% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 88% | 81% |
| 53% | 50% | 0% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 67% | 62% | 62% |
| 33% | 33% | 0% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 33% | 38% | 38% |
| 20% | 33% | 0% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 12% |
| 13% | 17% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 33% | 33% | 0% | BTTS | BTTS | 67% | 62% | 62% |
| 33% | 33% | 0% | Clean Sheets | C S | 33% | 25% | 31% |
| 40% | 33% | 100% | Failed to Score | F T | 0% | 25% | 25% |
| 2.7 | 2 | 2 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.9 |
| 4.1 | 3.2 | 3 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 3.3 | 3 | 3.5 |
| 1.9 | 1.5 | 1 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2.3 | 1.9 | 2.1 |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 6.5 | 6.3 | 6 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 5.7 | 6.9 | 7.7 |
| 2.7 | 3 | 4 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 2.7 | 3 | 3.9 |
| 32% | 28% | 0% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 50% | 33% | 29% |
| 7.5 | 6.7 | 5 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 8.3 | 8.9 | 7.3 |
| 3.7 | 3.2 | 3 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 2.7 | 2.6 | 2.5 |
- Chicago House have conceded at least twice as many goals as they have scored at home.
- Chicago House have the fewest points from losing position (0) in NISA
- Chicago House have the the worst goal difference (-6) at home in NISA
- Chicago House have won significantly less corners at home than away.
- Chicago House haven’t played a single 0-0 game at home.
- LA Force have won significantly less corners away then at home.
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Detroit City | 15 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 30 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 19 | 4 | 22 | 38 |
| 2 | LA Force | 16 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 19 | 12 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 29 |
| 3 | California Utd Strikers | 14 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 20 | 16 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 4 | 23 |
| 4 | Michigan Stars | 15 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 13 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 20 |
| 5 | Stumptown Athletic | 15 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 14 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 8 | -3 | 19 |
| 6 | Maryland Bobcats | 16 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 17 | 25 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 12 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 13 | -8 | 18 |
| 7 | Chattanooga | 15 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 12 | -1 | 17 |
| 8 | New Amsterdam | 15 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 22 | 24 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 10 | -2 | 17 |
| 9 | Chicago House | 15 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 10 | -8 | 17 |
| 10 | San Diego 1904 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 14 | 27 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 13 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 14 | -13 | 8 |