The season has been a struggle for Lund so far, and the same description fits Qviding FIF. These weathered teams have the opportunity for some important points here.
- Lund have won significantly more corners at home than away.
- Qviding FIF have conceded at least twice as many goals as they have scored.
Qviding FIF play their home games on artifical turf, while this match will be played on grass. Relevant results for Qviding FIF when playing on grass are 4 wins, 6 draws and 15 defeats from 25 matches. They have created 25 goals and conceded 50 times in these games.
The hosts Lund saw competitive action as recent as four days ago, playing in the Ettan: South. Thankfully the previous game, versus Falkenberg, was also a home game here at Klostergårdens IP. The away team is better rested.
Lund form and stats
When playing at home in the Ettan: South, Lund have managed 3 wins, 1 draw and suffered 2 defeats from 6 games. When Lund hosts teams that live in the bottom of the table (like Oskarshamns AIK, Åtvidaberg, Lindome, IFK Malmö and Lund), they have won 2 of 2 matches!
The Lund crowd went home unhappy last time out, seeing their beloved players lose 1-3 to Falkenberg here at Klostergårdens IP.
Lund have proved capable of finding the net in their games here at Klostergårdens IP with 9 goals in 6 league matches.
Qviding FIF form and stats
The story so far for the visiting team on their Ettan: South travels is 2 wins, 1 draw and 3 defeats. When Qviding FIF is visiting a side on the bottom half, they have won 2 of 2 matches. Oskarshamns AIK, Åtvidaberg, Lindome, IFK Malmö and Qviding FIF is teams we like to compare Lund with. Qviding love their trips these days, as their two previous away games have resulted in victories.
This match can not go any worse than the previous one, the home loss versus Ljungskile with 1-2 on the scoreboard.
Ahead of that match was the victory versus Lindome at their stadium, the result 1-0.Qviding FIF have conceded 11 goals in these games.
Head 2 Head
Last ten meetings between these teams: Lund won four, Qviding FIF were winners in three and we saw three draws. seven games with over 2,5 goals, three matches with less than 2,5 goals.Top Goalscorers
  R. Wendt 6 goals | D. Krasniqi 3 goals |  L. Farah Shahin 3 goals |
Lund missing players
Qviding FIF missing players
| Lund | Qviding FIF | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 13 | 6 | 2 | Played | P | 2 | 6 | 13 |
| 3 | 3 | 2 | Won | W | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| 5 | 1 | 0 | Drew | D | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 5 | 2 | 0 | Lost | L | 0 | 3 | 9 |
| 17 | 9 | 6 | Scored | S | 3 | 6 | 13 |
| 20 | 6 | 1 | Conceded | C | 1 | 11 | 29 |
| 92% | 83% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 85% | 67% | 100% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 50% | 83% | 85% |
| 69% | 67% | 100% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 50% | 67% | 69% |
| 38% | 33% | 50% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 0% | 17% | 31% |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 17% | 23% |
| 69% | 50% | 50% | BTTS | BTTS | 50% | 67% | 62% |
| 23% | 50% | 50% | Clean Sheets | C S | 50% | 17% | 15% |
| 15% | 17% | 0% | Failed to Score | F T | 0% | 17% | 23% |
| 3.4 | 4.5 | 1.5 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 5 | 4.2 | 4.8 |
| 4.3 | 4.3 | 3.5 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 5.5 | 3.4 | 4.2 |
| 1.8 | 2.3 | 1.5 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2.5 | 2.8 | 1.9 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| 6.9 | 10.5 | 11 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 11 | 8 | 10 |
| 3 | 5 | 5.5 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 4 | 3.4 | 4.2 |
| 42% | 30% | 55% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 38% | 29% | 24% |
| 9.6 | 10.3 | 9 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 9.5 | 10.4 | 11.3 |
| 4.8 | 5.3 | 4.5 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 3.5 | 5.6 | 5.5 |
- Lund have won significantly more corners at home than away.
- Qviding FIF have conceded at least twice as many goals as they have scored.
- Qviding FIF haven’t played a single 0-0 game.
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | GAIS | 13 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 24 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 14 | 30 |
| 2 | Ljungskile | 13 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 27 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 6 | 17 | 28 |
| 3 | Oddevold | 13 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 25 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 6 | 16 | 26 |
| 4 | Angelholm | 13 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 | 4 | 26 |
| 5 | Olympic | 13 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 25 | 17 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 24 |
| 6 | Trollhattan | 13 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 13 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 22 |
| 7 | Tvååker | 13 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 20 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 21 |
| 8 | Falkenberg | 13 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 18 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 12 | 8 | 7 | 21 |
| 9 | Vänersborgs IF | 13 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 18 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 18 |
| 10 | Torns | 13 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 16 | 22 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 12 | -6 | 15 |
| 11 | Lund | 13 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 17 | 20 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 14 | -3 | 14 |
| 12 | Oskarshamns AIK | 13 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 22 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 12 | -12 | 11 |
| 13 | Lindome | 13 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 18 | 34 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 20 | -16 | 10 |
| 14 | Qviding FIF | 13 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 13 | 29 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 7 | 18 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -16 | 10 |
| 15 | Åtvidaberg | 13 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 20 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -10 | 8 |
| 16 | IFK Malmö | 13 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 28 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 16 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 12 | -18 | 4 |
