Lindome - Qviding FIF: Ettan: South cellar occupants hungry for points and triumph. Read all the available stats and news before the match!
- Lindome have the most conceded goals (32) in Ettan: South
- Qviding FIF have the the worst goal difference (-16) in Ettan: South
This should be an entertaining game with lots of action and excitement as both contenders are well refreshed since they last saw competitive action. Get this show on the road!
Lindome form and stats
All-inclusive Ettan: South statistics at home this season for Lindome are 2-0-3 (wins-draws-losses).
Lindome faced defeat in their previous match, away at Lund (0-4). As you see from the result above, Lindome suffered greatly in their last game. Thankfully the team has a new chance to prove themselves in this one.
Before that game, the 3-2 home victory against Vanersborgs IF.As for conceded goals, Lindome's unpleasant statistic is 13 goals surrendered.
Qviding FIF form and stats
As the visiting team in Ettan: South matches, Qviding FIF have produced an overall stat of 1-1-3 so far.
The manager Alexandersson was unhappy after their last game, played at their home venue Valhalla IP. Qviding suffered a 1-6 loss to Vanersborgs IF (placed 9th). Qviding FIF lost the plot completely in their previous game, as mentioned above. They need to recover quickly from that 1-6 beating and focus on this one.
A 2-3 loss hosting Tvååker before that.Qviding FIF have conceded 11 goals in these games.
Head 2 Head
Head-2-head stats last four meetings: zero - two - two (Lindome wins - draws - Qviding FIF wins). As for goals, one match ended with three or more goals (over 2,5), three had two or less.Top Goalscorers
  I. Spanedal 5 goals | R. Cindric 3 goals |  L. Farah Shahin 3 goals |
Lindome missing players
Qviding FIF missing players
| Lindome | Qviding FIF | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 11 | 5 | 0 | Played | P | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| 3 | 2 | 0 | Won | W | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Drew | D | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 8 | 3 | 0 | Lost | L | 0 | 3 | 8 |
| 17 | 10 | 0 | Scored | S | 3 | 5 | 11 |
| 32 | 13 | 0 | Conceded | C | 2 | 11 | 27 |
| 100% | 100% | 0% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 82% | 80% | 0% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 100% | 100% | 91% |
| 82% | 80% | 0% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 50% | 80% | 73% |
| 82% | 80% | 0% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 0% | 20% | 36% |
| 55% | 60% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 20% | 27% |
| 64% | 80% | 0% | BTTS | BTTS | 100% | 80% | 64% |
| 18% | 20% | 0% | Clean Sheets | C S | 0% | 0% | 9% |
| 18% | 0% | 0% | Failed to Score | F T | 0% | 20% | 27% |
| 3.8 | 2.6 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 5.5 | 4 | 4.7 |
| 5.8 | 7.8 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 5 | 3.5 | 4.2 |
| 1.2 | 1 | 0 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 3 | 3 | 2.1 |
| 2 | 2 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 6.8 | 8.4 | 0 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 8.5 | 6.8 | 9 |
| 3.3 | 3.6 | 0 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 4.5 | 3.2 | 4.2 |
| 45% | 56% | 0% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 33% | 31% | 24% |
| 12.7 | 13.8 | 0 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 10 | 10.8 | 11.3 |
| 7.1 | 7 | 0 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 4.5 | 6.5 | 6 |
- All of Qviding FIF's away-matches have had more than 1,5 goals.
- Lindome have conceded at least twice as many corners as they have won at home.
- Lindome have scored in all their home matches so far.
- Lindome have the fewest matches under the total-line (0) in Ettan: South
- Lindome have the most conceded goals (32) in Ettan: South
- Lindome have the most conceded goals in the second half (21) in Ettan: South
- Lindome have the most dropped points from leading position (9) in Ettan: South
- Lindome have won significantly less corners at home than away.
- Lindome haven’t played a single 0-0 game.
- Qviding FIF have conceded at least twice as many goals as they have scored.
- Qviding FIF have failed to keep a clean sheet in all their away matches.
- Qviding FIF have played more matches over 2,5 goals away than home.
- Qviding FIF have the the worst goal difference (-16) in Ettan: South
- Qviding FIF haven’t played a single 0-0 game.
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | GAIS | 11 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 20 | 9 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 11 | 24 |
| 2 | Oddevold | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 23 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 6 | 15 | 23 |
| 3 | Ljungskile | 11 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 21 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 12 | 22 |
| 4 | Olympic | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 20 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 7 | 7 | 20 |
| 5 | Angelholm | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 20 |
| 6 | Trollhattan | 11 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 11 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 19 |
| 7 | Tvååker | 11 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 17 |
| 8 | Falkenberg | 11 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 7 | 5 | 17 |
| 9 | Vanersborgs IF | 11 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 18 | 15 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 3 | 15 |
| 10 | Lund | 11 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 15 | 15 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 12 | 0 | 14 |
| 11 | Torns | 11 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 14 | 20 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 10 | -6 | 12 |
| 12 | Oskarshamns AIK | 11 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 19 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 9 | -9 | 11 |
| 13 | Lindome | 11 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 17 | 32 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 19 | -15 | 9 |
| 14 | Qviding FIF | 11 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 11 | 27 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 11 | -16 | 7 |
| 15 | Åtvidaberg | 11 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 17 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -10 | 6 |
| 16 | IFK Malmö | 11 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 24 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 10 | -15 | 4 |
