Falkenberg know they are in for a rough trip to Lund and their Klostergårdens IP. This article has all the knowledge you need before the game.
- Lund have scored at least twice as many goals as they have conceded at home.
- Falkenberg have played more matches over 2,5 goals away than home.
Lund have less rest than Falkenberg in this fixture, as the hosts were involved in a Svenska Cupen game only three days ago. At least it's nice to return home after that away game at IFK Malmö.
Lund form and stats
Lund have played 5 Ettan: South games at their own stadium so far this season, resulting in 3-1-1 (wins-draws-losses).
Lund are returning here after guesting IFK Malmö in a Svenska Cupen game and winning with a 2-1 scoreline.
A Ettan: South defeat was the result before that one, 1-2 away at Vänersborgs IF.Some members of the home team might already be thinking of their next match, the Ettan: South game versus Qviding FIF in only four days. This game is also played here at Klostergårdens IP.
A decent goal production from Lund in their home games so far, with 8 goals from 5 league matches. Lund are not conceding a lot of goals here at Klostergårdens IP in the league, averaging less than one per game. The total is 3 from 5 matches.
Falkenberg form and stats
The hunting on away grounds haven’t been very fruitful for Falkenberg so far with only 6 points returning home. The records show 2-0-4 (win-draw-lose). Momentum is building for Falkenberg in their away games, having won their two previous outings.
Falkenberg's last game ended in a draw, the home match versus Tvååker that finished 1-1.
Preceding that game was the away victory against Åtvidaberg with the score of 4-0.The travelling fans enjoy Falkenberg's attacking play in away games, having scored 9 goals in 6 league matches away. As opposed to that, Falkenberg have seen the ball go into their own net 7 times on the road.
Head 2 Head
Top Goalscorers
  R. Wendt 6 goals |  R. Eliasson-Hofsö 5 goals | O. Hintsa 4 goals |
Lund missing players
Falkenberg missing players
| Lund | Falkenberg | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 12 | 5 | 2 | Played | P | 3 | 6 | 12 |
| 3 | 3 | 1 | Won | W | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| 5 | 1 | 0 | Drew | D | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | Lost | L | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| 16 | 8 | 2 | Scored | S | 8 | 9 | 15 |
| 17 | 3 | 2 | Conceded | C | 1 | 7 | 10 |
| 92% | 80% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 92% |
| 83% | 60% | 50% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 67% | 67% | 58% |
| 67% | 60% | 50% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 67% | 50% | 33% |
| 33% | 20% | 0% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 67% | 50% | 25% |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 67% | 40% | 50% | BTTS | BTTS | 0% | 17% | 33% |
| 25% | 60% | 50% | Clean Sheets | C S | 67% | 33% | 42% |
| 17% | 20% | 0% | Failed to Score | F T | 33% | 50% | 33% |
| 3.1 | 4 | 6.5 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 9.3 | 7.2 | 5.5 |
| 4.1 | 3.8 | 3 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 2.7 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| 1.8 | 2.6 | 3.5 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 1 | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6.6 | 10.6 | 12.5 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 14.7 | 12.8 | 11.4 |
| 3 | 5.4 | 6.5 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 6.7 | 5.3 | 4.9 |
| 42% | 30% | 15% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 40% | 28% | 25% |
| 9.1 | 9.4 | 11 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 4.7 | 5.5 | 5.9 |
| 4.5 | 4.8 | 6 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 2.3 | 2.2 | 2.1 |
- Falkenberg have played more matches over 2,5 goals away than home.
- Falkenberg have won at least twice as many corners as they have conceded away.
- Falkenberg have won significantly more corners away than at home.
- Falkenberg haven’t played a single 0-0 game away.
- Lund have scored at least twice as many goals as they have conceded at home.
- Lund have won significantly more corners at home than away.
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | GAIS | 12 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 22 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 27 |
| 2 | Ljungskile | 12 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 25 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 12 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 16 | 25 |
| 3 | Oddevold | 12 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 23 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 6 | 14 | 23 |
| 4 | Ängelholm | 12 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 14 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 | 3 | 23 |
| 5 | Trollhättan | 12 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 22 |
| 6 | Olympic | 12 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 22 | 16 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 21 |
| 7 | Tvååker | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 18 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 18 |
| 8 | Falkenberg | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 15 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 7 | 5 | 18 |
| 9 | Vänersborgs IF | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 20 | 16 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 18 |
| 10 | Torns | 12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 20 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 10 | -4 | 15 |
| 11 | Lund | 12 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 16 | 17 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 14 | -1 | 14 |
| 12 | Oskarshamns AIK | 12 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 10 | 21 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 11 | -11 | 11 |
| 13 | Qviding FIF | 12 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 12 | 27 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 16 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 11 | -15 | 10 |
| 14 | Lindome | 12 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 17 | 33 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 19 | -16 | 9 |
| 15 | Åtvidaberg | 12 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 9 | 19 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 8 | -10 | 7 |
| 16 | IFK Malmö | 12 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 26 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 10 | -16 | 4 |
