There has been no shortage of good and bad for these two squads so far this campaign, situated in positions near the median of the CFA Group D table. Here's the Canet Roussillon - Nantes II latest:
- Canet Roussillon have the fewest conceded goals in the first half (2) in CFA Group D
We should expect both teams to be fresh and ready for this match, as there is some time since both teams last played. Let's have a look at how the teams are doing!
Canet Roussillon form and stats
Canet Roussillon have played 12 CFA Group D games at their own stadium so far this season, resulting in 6-1-5 (wins-draws-losses). Canet Roussillon are very eager to stop a potential losing streak at Stade Saint-Michel, having lost their two previous games here.
A strong away win for Canet Roussillon against Colomiers US the last match, as Rambaud and Diaby (2) were on target.
Ahead of that match, Roussillon lost 0-2 at home to Andrézieux.Canet Roussillon have conceded 13 in these home matches.
Nantes II form and stats
Nantes II have only collected 11 points from their away games in the CFA Group D, after 2-5-4 (11 played). Nantes II seem to be suffering from homesickness with two consecutive losses away. Third time lucky?
Nantes are travelling again after losing away to Bergerac in their previous match (0-2).
Prior to that match, a home win 2-1 against Colomiers US.Nantes II find the net regularly in their away games. 15 goals from 11 away fixtures in the league. It's been trouble in front of goal recently, as only 1 of these goals has been scored in their last three away matches. 15 goals have been conceded by Nantes II in these games.
Head 2 Head
Nantes II - Roussillon 1-2 was the result in these squads' previous head-to-head match, earlier this season.Top Goalscorers
  J. Affamah 8 goals |  A. Diaby 5 goals | T. Rambaud 5 goals |
Canet Roussillon missing players
Nantes II missing players
| Canet Roussillon | Nantes II | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 22 | 12 | 2 | Played | P | 2 | 11 | 23 |
| 10 | 6 | 1 | Won | W | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| 5 | 1 | 0 | Drew | D | 1 | 5 | 8 |
| 7 | 5 | 1 | Lost | L | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| 21 | 12 | 3 | Scored | S | 4 | 15 | 28 |
| 24 | 13 | 3 | Conceded | C | 5 | 15 | 26 |
| 86% | 92% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 91% | 87% |
| 64% | 67% | 100% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 100% | 82% | 70% |
| 32% | 33% | 100% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 50% | 36% | 43% |
| 14% | 8% | 0% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 50% | 36% | 22% |
| 9% | 8% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 50% | 9% | 4% |
| 32% | 25% | 100% | BTTS | BTTS | 100% | 55% | 57% |
| 41% | 42% | 0% | Clean Sheets | C S | 0% | 27% | 35% |
| 41% | 42% | 0% | Failed to Score | F T | 0% | 27% | 22% |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 0 | 3.2 | 3.3 |
| 4.5 | 0 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 0 | 4 | 4.5 |
| 1.8 | 0 | 0 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 0 | 2 | 1.5 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | 0 | 0 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 0 | 8 | 9.1 |
| 5.2 | 0 | 0 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 0 | 3.5 | 4.2 |
| 14% | 0% | 0% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 0% | 14% | 24% |
| 10.2 | 0 | 0 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 0 | 15 | 10.7 |
| 3.5 | 0 | 0 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 0 | 7.5 | 5.5 |
- Canet Roussillon have played more matches over 2,5 goals home than away.
- Canet Roussillon have the fewest conceded goals in the first half (2) in CFA Group D
- Canet Roussillon have won significantly less corners at home than away.
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Bergerac | 24 | 13 | 8 | 3 | 28 | 12 | 12 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 16 | 5 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 16 | 47 |
| 2 | Angoulême | 23 | 12 | 7 | 4 | 29 | 16 | 12 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 13 | 43 |
| 3 | Andrézieux | 23 | 12 | 5 | 6 | 32 | 20 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 9 | 12 | 41 |
| 4 | Le Puy F.43 Auvergne | 23 | 11 | 7 | 5 | 27 | 15 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 40 |
| 5 | Bourges Foot 18 | 24 | 11 | 5 | 8 | 33 | 22 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 12 | 11 | 38 |
| 6 | Canet Roussillon | 22 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 21 | 24 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 13 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -3 | 35 |
| 7 | Yzeure | 24 | 8 | 10 | 6 | 24 | 22 | 12 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 34 |
| 8 | Nantes II | 23 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 28 | 26 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 15 | 15 | 2 | 32 |
| 9 | Béziers | 23 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 27 | 25 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 22 | 12 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 13 | 2 | 31 |
| 10 | Les Herbiers | 23 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 26 | 27 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 14 | 12 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 14 | 13 | -1 | 31 |
| 11 | Angers SCO II | 24 | 6 | 11 | 7 | 23 | 23 | 11 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 13 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 14 | 15 | 0 | 29 |
| 12 | Trélissac | 23 | 7 | 6 | 10 | 21 | 22 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 11 | 9 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 13 | -1 | 27 |
| 13 | Chamalieres | 24 | 7 | 6 | 11 | 26 | 32 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 18 | 15 | 12 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 17 | -6 | 27 |
| 14 | Montpellier II | 23 | 6 | 5 | 12 | 23 | 34 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 11 | 16 | -11 | 23 |
| 15 | Colomiers US | 23 | 4 | 8 | 11 | 22 | 33 | 12 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 14 | 18 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 15 | -11 | 20 |
| 16 | Stade Montois | 23 | 1 | 3 | 19 | 14 | 51 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 23 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 28 | -37 | 6 |
