Welcome to CFA Group D and Canet Roussillon - Montpellier II. In this pre-match guide you'll get statistics, previous results, data, tendencies and news!
- Canet Roussillon have played more matches over 2,5 goals home than away.
- Montpellier II have the most conceded goals in the first half (11) in CFA Group D
Both teams should be fairly well rested for this game, as they have had some quiet days to prepare. Hopefully this will translate into lots of action on the pitch.
Canet Roussillon form and stats
When playing at home in the CFA Group D, Canet Roussillon have managed 6 wins, 1 draw and suffered 3 defeats from 10 games.
Canet Roussillon are confident in defense, having played 180 minutes without conceding a goal in the league.
A strong away win for Roussillon against Les Herbiers the last match, as Rambaud were on target.
Ahead of that match, Canet Roussillon won a home game hosting Angers SCO II (2-0).Roussillon are certainly not overdoing their scoring at home in league matches, having created 12 goals in 10 games.
Montpellier II form and stats
As the visiting team in CFA Group D matches, Montpellier II have produced an overall stat of 3-1-5 so far.
Montpellier II delivered a 0-0 draw playing at home against Nantes II (placed 9th) in their previous match.
Preceding that game, the 1-1 draw paying a visit to Colomiers US.Montpellier II have a decent goal production going in their away games, although not fantastic. In 9 league away games 10 goals have been scored. Montpellier have conceded 13 goals in these away matches.
Head 2 Head
The previous head to head game ended Montpellier II - Canet Roussillon 0-0, played this season. H2H stats regardless of arena (last five matches): Roussillon zero wins, one draw and Montpellier II four victories. As for goals, two matches ended with three or more goals (over 2,5), three games had two or less.Top Goalscorers
  I. Bakayoko 8 goals |  T. Rambaud 4 goals | A. Diaby 3 goals |
Canet Roussillon missing players
Montpellier II missing players
| Canet Roussillon | Montpellier II | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 18 | 10 | 4 | Played | P | 3 | 9 | 19 |
| 9 | 6 | 4 | Won | W | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| 4 | 1 | 0 | Drew | D | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| 5 | 3 | 0 | Lost | L | 3 | 5 | 11 |
| 18 | 12 | 8 | Scored | S | 1 | 10 | 18 |
| 19 | 10 | 2 | Conceded | C | 5 | 13 | 29 |
| 89% | 90% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 89% |
| 67% | 70% | 75% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 67% | 78% | 79% |
| 33% | 40% | 25% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 33% | 56% | 53% |
| 11% | 10% | 25% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 0% | 11% | 16% |
| 6% | 10% | 25% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 11% | 11% |
| 33% | 30% | 25% | BTTS | BTTS | 33% | 67% | 58% |
| 44% | 50% | 75% | Clean Sheets | C S | 0% | 0% | 16% |
| 33% | 30% | 0% | Failed to Score | F T | 67% | 33% | 37% |
| 3.7 | 0 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 4.3 | 3.5 | 3.3 |
| 5.7 | 0 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 4.3 | 3.8 | 3.3 |
| 1.7 | 0 | 0 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 0.7 | 2 | 1.5 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 7.3 | 0 | 0 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 7 | 7.7 | 9.2 |
| 3.3 | 0 | 0 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 2.3 | 3 | 3.5 |
| 30% | 0% | 0% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 14% | 28% | 24% |
| 12.7 | 0 | 0 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 7.3 | 9.5 | 9.9 |
| 4.3 | 0 | 0 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 4.7 | 5.3 | 4.5 |
- Canet Roussillon have played more matches over 2,5 goals home than away.
- Canet Roussillon have won significantly less corners at home than away.
- Montpellier II have failed to keep a clean sheet in all their away matches.
- Montpellier II have played more matches over 2,5 goals away than home.
- Montpellier II have the most conceded goals in the first half (11) in CFA Group D
- Montpellier II have the most conceded goals in the second half (11) in CFA Group D
- Montpellier II have the most matches over the total-line (6) in CFA Group D
- Montpellier II haven’t played a single 0-0 game away.
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Angouleme | 20 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 27 | 15 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 11 | 8 | 12 | 39 |
| 2 | Bergerac | 19 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 23 | 10 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 13 | 37 |
| 3 | Yzeure | 19 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 20 | 14 | 9 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 9 | 6 | 32 |
| 4 | Bourges Foot 18 | 19 | 9 | 4 | 6 | 27 | 17 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 10 | 10 | 31 |
| 5 | Andrézieux | 19 | 9 | 4 | 6 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 10 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 31 |
| 6 | Canet Roussillon | 18 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 18 | 19 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -1 | 31 |
| 7 | Béziers | 19 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 25 | 20 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 20 | 9 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 11 | 5 | 29 |
| 8 | Le Puy F.43 Auvergne | 18 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 20 | 13 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 9 | 11 | 7 | 27 |
| 9 | Nantes II | 19 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 23 | 19 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 26 |
| 10 | Les Herbiers | 20 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 23 | 27 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 14 | 11 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 13 | 13 | -4 | 24 |
| 11 | Trélissac | 19 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 16 | 17 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 9 | -1 | 23 |
| 12 | Angers SCO II | 19 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 19 | 20 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 13 | -1 | 22 |
| 13 | Chamalières | 19 | 6 | 4 | 9 | 23 | 27 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 14 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 13 | -4 | 22 |
| 14 | Colomiers US | 19 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 16 | 24 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 12 | -8 | 19 |
| 15 | Montpellier II | 19 | 4 | 4 | 11 | 18 | 29 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 16 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 13 | -11 | 16 |
| 16 | Stade Montois | 19 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 14 | 48 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 22 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 26 | -34 | 4 |
