Nantes II have won 26 points running out as the home side. Chamalières have got 22 points playing away. Could we look at anything else than a home win?
- Nantes II have played more matches over 2,5 goals home than away.
- Chamalières have the most points from losing position (8) in CFA Group D
Nantes II's stadium, Stade Marcel-Saupin, has a grass surface. Chamalières have artifical turf on their own stadium. This might or might not make a difference, and to help evaluate that we give you the recent performance numbers for Chamalières when playing on grass; 11 wins, 8 draws and 20 losses from 39 matches. They have scored 32 goals in these games and conceded 56.
It’s busy days for these teams as both were in action only a few days ago. There’s no rest for the wicked, or in this case; no rest for Nantes II and Chamalières.
Nantes II form and stats
4 victories, 3 draws and 3 defeats. That’s what Nantes II have to build on here at Stade Marcel-Saupin in the CFA Group D.
A nice win for Nantes last time playing, versus Chamalières. That was also a home game and the match ended 2-0.
Preceding that match was a defeat to Les Herbiers (1-3).The hosts are modest favourites in this match, with the bookmakers estimating the chance of a home win at about 50% +- five percent. It's interesting to look at how Nantes II have performed under similar circumstances, so here are some numbers: When modest favourites like this (we found eleven games) they have won three times, drawn three and lost five.
Nantes II aren't scoring a lot here at Stade Marcel-Saupin in the league, with only 9 goals from 10 games. Nantes II have only conceded 9 from their league home games. For more goal stats, check the Statistics tab above.
Chamalières form and stats
The hunting on away grounds haven’t been very fruitful for Chamalières so far with only 8 points returning home. The records show 2-2-5 (win-draw-lose).
Did you know that the longest clean sheet streak is 1816 minutes? This record is held by Mazaropi when he played in Vasco da Gama. Chamalières goalkeeper is eager to challenge this, with his 238 minutes of keeping balls out from the net.
It might be tough going out on the road again for Chamalières, facing their second straight away game. Especially as the previous game, ended with a defeat 0-2 versus Nantes II (placed 9th).
Before that, Chamalières secured a home win against Colomiers US with the score 2-0.We have checked recent matches where Chamalières have had similar odds to win. Win-draw-lose statistics from those five games were one victory, one draw and three defeats.
The visitors have scored 7 goals from 9 away games in the league, an average of less than one per game. It's been trouble in front of goal recently, as only 0 of these goals has been scored in their last three away matches. As opposed to that, Chamalières have seen the ball go into their own net 13 times on the road.
Head 2 Head
The most recent past history between these squads is the Chamalières - Nantes 2-2 played earlier this season. H2H stats regardless of arena (last three matches): Nantes II two wins, one draw and Chamalières zero victories. As for goals, one match ended with three or more goals (over 2,5), two games had two or less.Top Goalscorers
![]() J. Affamah 7 goals | ![]() C. Bitsamou 4 goals |
Nantes II missing players
Chamalières missing players
| Nantes II | Chamalières | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 20 | 11 | 3 | Played | P | 2 | 10 | 20 |
| 7 | 5 | 2 | Won | W | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| 8 | 3 | 1 | Drew | D | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| 5 | 3 | 0 | Lost | L | 1 | 6 | 10 |
| 25 | 11 | 4 | Scored | S | 2 | 7 | 23 |
| 19 | 9 | 2 | Conceded | C | 3 | 15 | 29 |
| 85% | 82% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 90% | 95% |
| 65% | 55% | 67% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 100% | 80% | 85% |
| 35% | 36% | 33% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 50% | 40% | 55% |
| 20% | 9% | 0% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 0% | 10% | 20% |
| 5% | 0% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 5% |
| 50% | 45% | 67% | BTTS | BTTS | 50% | 50% | 60% |
| 45% | 55% | 33% | Clean Sheets | C S | 0% | 10% | 15% |
| 20% | 18% | 0% | Failed to Score | F T | 50% | 50% | 30% |
| 3.5 | 3.4 | 2.3 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 7 | 3.2 | 3 |
| 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.7 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 8 | 7 | 4.4 |
| 1.5 | 1.2 | 1 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 0 | 1 | 1.1 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| 8.9 | 9.2 | 8 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 14 | 5.5 | 7 |
| 4.1 | 4.2 | 4 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 6 | 2 | 3.1 |
| 22% | 26% | 33% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 33% | 25% | 36% |
| 9.9 | 7.6 | 6 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 8 | 11.8 | 9.8 |
| 5 | 4 | 2.7 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 4 | 5 | 3.8 |
- Chamalières have conceded at least twice as many corners as they have won away.
- Chamalières have conceded at least twice as many goals as they have scored away.
- Chamalières have the most points from losing position (8) in CFA Group D
- Nantes II have played more matches over 2,5 goals home than away.
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Angouleme | 20 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 27 | 15 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 11 | 8 | 12 | 39 |
| 2 | Bergerac | 19 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 23 | 10 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 13 | 37 |
| 3 | Yzeure | 19 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 20 | 14 | 9 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 9 | 6 | 32 |
| 4 | Bourges Foot 18 | 19 | 9 | 4 | 6 | 27 | 17 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 10 | 10 | 31 |
| 5 | Andrézieux | 19 | 9 | 4 | 6 | 23 | 16 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 10 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 31 |
| 6 | Canet Roussillon | 18 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 18 | 19 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -1 | 31 |
| 7 | Béziers | 19 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 25 | 20 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 20 | 9 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 11 | 5 | 29 |
| 8 | Le Puy F.43 Auvergne | 18 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 20 | 13 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 9 | 11 | 7 | 27 |
| 9 | Nantes II | 19 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 23 | 19 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 26 |
| 10 | Les Herbiers | 20 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 23 | 27 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 14 | 11 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 13 | 13 | -4 | 24 |
| 11 | Trélissac | 19 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 16 | 17 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 9 | -1 | 23 |
| 12 | Angers SCO II | 19 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 19 | 20 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 13 | -1 | 22 |
| 13 | Chamalières | 19 | 6 | 4 | 9 | 23 | 27 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 14 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 13 | -4 | 22 |
| 14 | Colomiers US | 19 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 16 | 24 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 12 | -8 | 19 |
| 15 | Montpellier II | 19 | 4 | 4 | 11 | 18 | 29 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 16 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 13 | -11 | 16 |
| 16 | Stade Montois | 19 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 14 | 48 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 22 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 26 | -34 | 4 |