Union Omaha have done better than Tucson so far this season, but every match opens at 0-0. Here's all the intelligence you require ahead of kickoff:
- Union Omaha have the fewest conceded goals (22) in USL League One
- Tucson have played more matches over 2,5 goals away than home.
Both squads have had a decent time to rest since their last match. Let's agree to expect an animated fixture!
Union Omaha form and stats
7 victories, 4 draws and 3 defeats. That’s what Union Omaha have to build on here at Werner Park in the USL League One.
Omaha shared the glory with North Texas in their last match, an away game that ended all square 1-1. The hometeam coach J. Mims made a successful contribution in the game against North Texas, bringing on Nicolas Firmino who scored the equalizer in the 1-1 draw.
Previous to that game, a home match hosting Richmond Kickers in a game that was won 2-0.A decent goal production from Omaha in their home games so far, with 23 goals from 14 league matches. Union Omaha are not conceding a lot of goals here at Werner Park in the league, averaging less than one per game. The total is 12 from 14 matches.
Tucson form and stats
5-5-4 is the win-draw-loss statistic for Tucson in their USL League One matches away.
Tucson go into this game after a win, the home game against Richmond Kickers that ended 1-0.
Before that, Tucson secured a home win against Richmond Kickers with the score 4-2.Tucson has displayed an ability to score goals in away matches in the league this season, 21 goals from 14 games. In the opposite end, Tucson have conceded 21 goals in their away games.
Head 2 Head
The squads have met each other before in this season, with the match result Omaha - Tucson 0-1 logged in the official records. H2H stats regardless of arena (last six matches): Omaha five wins, zero draws and Tucson one victory. As for goals, three matches ended with three or more goals (over 2,5), three games had two or less.Top Goalscorers
![]() G. Hurst 13 goals | ![]() E. Conway 10 goals | ![]() C. Dennis 9 goals |
Union Omaha missing players
Tucson missing players
| Union Omaha | Tucson | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 28 | 14 | 3 | Played | P | 4 | 14 | 29 |
| 14 | 7 | 3 | Won | W | 0 | 5 | 12 |
| 9 | 4 | 0 | Drew | D | 4 | 5 | 7 |
| 5 | 3 | 0 | Lost | L | 0 | 4 | 10 |
| 44 | 23 | 8 | Scored | S | 6 | 21 | 45 |
| 22 | 12 | 3 | Conceded | C | 6 | 21 | 42 |
| 96% | 93% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 75% | 93% | 97% |
| 71% | 71% | 100% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 75% | 71% | 79% |
| 36% | 36% | 67% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 50% | 64% | 59% |
| 18% | 21% | 33% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 50% | 43% | 34% |
| 11% | 21% | 33% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 25% | 14% | 17% |
| 54% | 57% | 67% | BTTS | BTTS | 75% | 64% | 62% |
| 32% | 29% | 33% | Clean Sheets | C S | 25% | 21% | 17% |
| 18% | 21% | 0% | Failed to Score | F T | 25% | 21% | 24% |
| 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.7 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 1.5 | 3.1 | 3.6 |
| 3.5 | 3.1 | 3.3 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 5.2 | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| 1.9 | 2.1 | 2.3 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2.8 | 3.1 | 2.6 |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| 9.5 | 9.5 | 9.3 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 5.5 | 8.8 | 10.1 |
| 3.3 | 3 | 2.7 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 2.8 | 3.8 | 4.3 |
| 48% | 55% | 100% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 55% | 39% | 33% |
| 6.3 | 5.8 | 7 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 10 | 9.2 | 9.8 |
| 2.1 | 1.5 | 1.3 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 2.8 | 2.8 | 3.7 |
- Tucson have played more matches over 2,5 goals away than home.
- Union Omaha have the fewest conceded goals (22) in USL League One
- Union Omaha have the the best goal difference (+22) in USL League One
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Union Omaha | 28 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 44 | 22 | 14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 23 | 12 | 14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 21 | 10 | 22 | 51 |
| 2 | Greenville Triumph | 28 | 12 | 9 | 7 | 36 | 29 | 14 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 21 | 15 | 14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 15 | 14 | 7 | 45 |
| 3 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 28 | 11 | 11 | 6 | 37 | 29 | 14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 21 | 15 | 14 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 16 | 14 | 8 | 44 |
| 4 | North Texas | 28 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 40 | 32 | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 8 | 40 |
| 5 | Tucson | 28 | 11 | 7 | 10 | 44 | 42 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 23 | 21 | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 21 | 21 | 2 | 40 |
| 6 | Richmond Kickers | 28 | 11 | 7 | 10 | 35 | 36 | 14 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 19 | 11 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 16 | 25 | -1 | 40 |
| 7 | Toronto II | 28 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 34 | 32 | 14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 18 | 11 | 14 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 16 | 21 | 2 | 38 |
| 8 | New England II | 28 | 11 | 4 | 13 | 33 | 39 | 14 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 18 | 13 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 15 | 26 | -6 | 37 |
| 9 | Forward Madison | 28 | 8 | 12 | 8 | 32 | 34 | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 16 | 13 | 14 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 16 | 21 | -2 | 36 |
| 10 | Inter Miami II | 28 | 8 | 7 | 13 | 40 | 49 | 14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 23 | 24 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 17 | 25 | -9 | 31 |
| 11 | Tormenta | 28 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 36 | 47 | 14 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 17 | 20 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 19 | 27 | -11 | 30 |
| 12 | North Carolina | 28 | 7 | 4 | 17 | 30 | 50 | 14 | 5 | 0 | 9 | 20 | 25 | 14 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 10 | 25 | -20 | 25 |