It's early days in the USL League One and both Tormenta and Greenville Triumph are still hoping for a flying start in order to set the tone for the season. Three points can make a big difference at this stage.
- Greenville Triumph have the the best goal difference (+6) in USL League One
This should be an interesting game with lots of spark and energy as both teams are well rested since they last saw competitive action. Game on!
It should be mentioned that Greenville Triumph play their home matches on artifical turf, so they have to adjust for this one as it's played on grass. Does it matter? Recent statistics for Greenville Triumph on grass are 8 victories, 3 draws and 5 defeats from 16 games. In these matches they have a goal statistics scored/conceded: 23-15. You can compare this with overall results below.
Tormenta form and stats
Only two USL League One home games for Tormenta so far, yet both highs and lows with 1 win, 0 draws and 1 defeat.
No payout for Tormenta in their previous match, an away game at North Texas that ended in defeat 1-2.
Heartbreak before that as Tormenta lost 0-2 at Richmond Kickers's place.Tormenta has scored 3 goals so far and conceded 2 goals from 2 home games. These are numbers from the league only.
Greenville Triumph form and stats
Greenville Triumph, who have the the best goal difference (+6) in USL League One, are on a winning streak away after three games, as mentioned below. A maximum 6 points in the bag from 2 travels in the USL League One.
Greenville's last game ended in a draw, the home match versus Union Omaha that finished 1-1.
Ahead of that match was the victory versus North Carolina at their stadium, the result 2-1.Greenville Triumph have the goal stats of 3-1 (for/against) from 2 business trips in the league at this early stage of the season.
Head 2 Head
H2H stats regardless of arena (last seven matches): Tormenta two wins, one draw and Greenville Triumph four victories. As for goals, two matches ended with three or more goals (over 2,5), five games had two or less.Top Goalscorers
  M. Micaletto 2 goals | L. McLean 2 goals | J. Phelps 1 goals |
Tormenta missing players
Greenville Triumph missing players
| Tormenta | Greenville Triumph | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | Played | P | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | Won | W | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Drew | D | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | Lost | L | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 3 | 0 | Scored | S | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| 8 | 2 | 1 | Conceded | C | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 100% | 100% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 80% | 50% | 0% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 100% | 50% | 75% |
| 40% | 50% | 0% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 100% | 50% | 50% |
| 20% | 50% | 0% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 25% |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 40% | 50% | 0% | BTTS | BTTS | 100% | 50% | 50% |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Clean Sheets | C S | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 60% | 50% | 100% | Failed to Score | F T | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 2 | 1 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2 | 2.5 | 2.2 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 7.4 | 8.5 | 7 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 13 | 11.5 | 11.8 |
| 2.2 | 3 | 2 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 6 | 4.5 | 5.2 |
| 36% | 50% | 0% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 33% | 33% | 38% |
- Greenville Triumph have the the best goal difference (+6) in USL League One
| Tormenta | Last season | Greenville Triumph | |||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 16 | 8 | Played | P | 8 | 16 | ||
| 5 | 2 | Won | W | 4 | 11 | ||
| 4 | 3 | Drew | D | 2 | 2 | ||
| 7 | 3 | Lost | L | 2 | 3 | ||
| 19 | 12 | Scored | S | 12 | 24 | ||
| 22 | 9 | Conceded | C | 7 | 11 | ||
| 94% | 88% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 88% | 94% | ||
| 75% | 75% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 62% | 56% | ||
| 62% | 62% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 50% | 38% | ||
| 25% | 38% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 25% | 19% | ||
| 0% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 12% | 12% | ||
| 50% | 50% | BTTS | BTTS | 50% | 38% | ||
| 25% | 38% | Clean Sheets | C S | 38% | 56% | ||
| 31% | 25% | Failed to Score | F T | 25% | 12% | ||
| 0 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1.6 | 1.1 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 1.3 | 1.3 | ||
| 4 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 1 | ||
| 5.9 | 4.1 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 7 | 7.1 | ||
| 2.6 | 2.5 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 3.9 | 3.9 | ||
| 45% | 60% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 37% | 38% | ||
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Greenville Triumph | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 10 |
| 2 | Union Omaha | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 10 |
| 3 | Inter Miami II | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 9 |
| 4 | Richmond Kickers | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| 5 | North Texas | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | -2 | 6 |
| 6 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| 7 | Forward Madison | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 8 | New England II | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -3 | 4 |
| 9 | Tormenta | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6 | -4 | 3 |
| 10 | Tucson | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 1 |
| 11 | Toronto II | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | North Carolina | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 0 |