The USL Championship season is still fresh and sports bettors should be cautious. This meeting between New York RB II and Pittsburgh Riverhounds promises to be an interesting one.
- New York RB II have the most conceded goals (8) in USL Championship
- Pittsburgh Riverhounds have the fewest scored goals (1) in USL Championship
Both teams should be fairly well rested for this game, as they have had some quiet days to prepare. Hopefully this will translate into lots of action on the pitch.
New York RB II form and stats
Three USL Championship home games done for New York RB II, who are not happy collecting 1 point from these matches.
New York RB II manager J. Wolyniec and his team return home after a 2-2 draw away versus Charleston Battery (placed 6th) in the USL Championship. Trouble was brewing at the score 0-2 against Charleston Battery last time out, but a goal from R. Mitchell completed a comeback to a draw result for York.
A strong away win before that one, visiting Loudoun United and winning 2-1.New York RB II are certainly not overdoing their scoring at home in league matches, having created 3 goals in 3 games. With more than 1,5 conceded goals on average, the York defense is not exactly impregnable. 5 goals conceded from 3 games. You can find more goal stats on the Statistics tab above.
Pittsburgh Riverhounds form and stats
The USL Championship season is young and Pittsburgh Riverhounds, who have the fewest scored goals (1) in USL Championship, have only just started going through their travel schedule, with 2 away games done and still no victory. 1 draw and 1 defeat so far.
Riverhounds's previous game was their home loss versus Charlotte Independence (0-1).
Ahead of that match was the away draw versus Hartford Athletic that ended 1-1.Pittsburgh Riverhounds have the goal stats of 1-4 (for/against) from 2 business trips in the league at this early stage of the season.
Head 2 Head
Head-2-head stats last ten meetings: four - one - five (York wins - draws - Pittsburgh Riverhounds wins). As for goals, eight matches ended with three or more goals (over 2,5), two had two or less.New York RB II missing players
Pittsburgh Riverhounds missing players
| New York RB II | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 5 | 3 | 1 | Played | P | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | Won | W | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | Drew | D | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | 0 | Lost | L | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 7 | 3 | 1 | Scored | S | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 8 | 5 | 1 | Conceded | C | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| 100% | 100% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 80% | 67% | 100% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 0% | 100% | 67% |
| 60% | 33% | 0% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 0% | 50% | 33% |
| 40% | 33% | 0% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 20% | 33% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 80% | 67% | 100% | BTTS | BTTS | 0% | 50% | 33% |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Clean Sheets | C S | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 20% | 33% | 0% | Failed to Score | F T | 0% | 50% | 67% |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3.6 | 4 | 4 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 0 | 1.5 | 2.3 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 7.8 | 6.3 | 6 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 0 | 5.5 | 8.7 |
| 3.2 | 2.7 | 3 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 0 | 2 | 2.3 |
| 44% | 38% | 33% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 0% | 25% | 14% |
- New York RB II have the most conceded goals (8) in USL Championship
- New York RB II have the most conceded goals in the first half (6) in USL Championship
- Pittsburgh Riverhounds have the fewest scored goals (1) in USL Championship
- Pittsburgh Riverhounds have the most conceded goals (4) away in USL Championship
- Pittsburgh Riverhounds have the the worst goal difference (-3) away in USL Championship
- Pittsburgh Riverhounds have the the worst goal difference (-4) in USL Championship
| New York RB II | Last season | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | |||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 16 | 9 | Played | P | 9 | 17 | ||
| 5 | 3 | Won | W | 6 | 11 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Drew | D | 0 | 1 | ||
| 11 | 6 | Lost | L | 3 | 5 | ||
| 30 | 14 | Scored | S | 19 | 39 | ||
| 37 | 17 | Conceded | C | 6 | 12 | ||
| 100% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 100% | ||
| 88% | 78% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 78% | 76% | ||
| 81% | 67% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 56% | 65% | ||
| 50% | 22% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 22% | 35% | ||
| 44% | 22% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 11% | 18% | ||
| 62% | 33% | BTTS | BTTS | 22% | 29% | ||
| 6% | 11% | Clean Sheets | C S | 56% | 47% | ||
| 31% | 56% | Failed to Score | F T | 22% | 24% | ||
| 0 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1.8 | 2.1 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 1.6 | 1.6 | ||
| 2 | 2 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | ||
| 11.6 | 9.9 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 7.1 | 8.8 | ||
| 5.2 | 4.8 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 3.2 | 4.2 | ||
| 36% | 33% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 66% | 55% | ||
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 12 |
| 2 | Hartford Athletic | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| 3 | Charlotte Independence | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| 4 | Miami FC II | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| 5 | New York RB II | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | -1 | 5 |
| 6 | Charleston Battery | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -3 | 2 |
| 7 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | -4 | 1 |
| 8 | Loudoun United | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -2 | 0 |