National cups are something special for many teams and supporters. Today's match will decide whether it's Portland Timbers III or Contra Costa that keep their silverware dream alive.
It’s a hectic schedule for the away team, as they were in action only four days ago in the NPSL. That game, against Napa Valley 1839, was also an away game. It's a tiring schedule for Contra Costa.
L D W W W
Portland Timbers III form and stats
Last season, Portland Timbers III's US Open Cup journey ended in the 2nd round.In their previous game, the manager Lewis led his Portland to a defeat away at Des Moines Menace. The manager is hoping to put things right immediately here at McCulloch Stadium.
Before that, Portland Timbers III drew at home versus Park City Red Wolves. L W L L
Contra Costa form and stats
Contra Costa lost away at Napa Valley 1839 (2-3) in their previous game and are perhaps starting to feel homesick.
After this away game Contra return home for a NPSL game against Davis. That game is only four sleeps after this.
Head 2 Head
Portland Timbers III missing players
Contra Costa missing players
| Portland Timbers III | Contra Costa | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 13 | Played | P | 3 | 4 | ||
| 13 | 8 | Won | W | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6 | 2 | Drew | D | 0 | 0 | ||
| 6 | 3 | Lost | L | 2 | 3 | ||
| 52 | 33 | Scored | S | 7 | 7 | ||
| 38 | 16 | Conceded | C | 7 | 9 | ||
| 96% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 100% | ||
| 92% | 100% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 100% | 100% | ||
| 68% | 77% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 67% | 50% | ||
| 40% | 38% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 67% | 50% | ||
| 32% | 31% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 67% | 50% | ||
| 56% | 62% | BTTS | BTTS | 67% | 50% | ||
| 28% | 31% | Clean Sheets | C S | 0% | 0% | ||
| 20% | 8% | Failed to Score | F T | 33% | 50% | ||
| 2.4 | 3.7 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1.8 | 2.3 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1.1 | 0.8 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | ||
| 4.6 | 6.3 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2.2 | 3 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 0 | 0 | ||
| 114% | 117% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 0% | 0% | ||
| 3.5 | 3.7 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 0 | 0 | ||
| 1.6 | 2 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 0 | 0 | ||
