Perhaps a welcome break from league football as Cleveland SC & Chicago FC United face off to decide who makes it to next stage of the US Open Cup. All the pre-match information is available here!
Cleveland SC form and stats
5 victories, 0 draws and 0 defeats. That’s what Cleveland SC have to build on here in the NPSL.
The Cleveland SC crowd went home unhappy last time out, seeing their beloved players lose 3-4 to Denton Diablos here.
A strong away win before that one, visiting Minneapolis City and winning 2-0.It's goals goals goals for Cleveland SC who have scored 18 goals from 5 league home games. 6 goals have been conceded.
Chicago FC United form and stats
Last season their US Open Cup adventure ended in the 3rd round.Chicago FC United's travelling support has been rewarded for their time and money so far this season, having witnessed Chicago FC United collect 13 points from their 6 away matches in the PDL. 4 victories and 1 draw have created these points (and only 1 defeat).
The manager Retzlaff was unhappy after their last game, played at their home venue Hoyne Field. Chicago FC United suffered a 1-3 loss to Michigan Bucks.
A home win before that, celebrating 3-0 vs Wichita.The Chicago manager Retzlaff has got the team scoring on the road, with 14 away goals in 6 league matches. As opposed to that, Chicago FC United have seen the ball go into their own net 7 times on the road.
Head 2 Head
Cleveland SC missing players
Chicago FC United missing players
| Cleveland SC | Chicago FC United | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 16 | 8 | Played | P | 12 | 25 | ||
| 12 | 6 | Won | W | 9 | 16 | ||
| 3 | 1 | Drew | D | 1 | 3 | ||
| 1 | 1 | Lost | L | 2 | 6 | ||
| 41 | 27 | Scored | S | 25 | 56 | ||
| 17 | 12 | Conceded | C | 9 | 24 | ||
| 94% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 100% | ||
| 94% | 100% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 75% | 88% | ||
| 75% | 100% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 50% | 64% | ||
| 50% | 88% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 25% | 44% | ||
| 25% | 50% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 8% | 12% | ||
| 75% | 88% | BTTS | BTTS | 33% | 48% | ||
| 25% | 12% | Clean Sheets | C S | 50% | 44% | ||
| 6% | 0% | Failed to Score | F T | 17% | 8% | ||
| 0 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 2.5 | 3.8 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 4.7 | 4.4 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 1.3 | 0.9 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 10 | 11.7 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 6 | 6.2 | ||
| 0% | 0% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 47% | 42% | ||
| 0 | 0 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 9.3 | 9 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 4.8 | 4.5 | ||
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Cleveland SC | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 25 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 16 | 26 |
| 2 | Pittsburgh Hotspurs | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 14 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 5 | 24 |
| 3 | Buffalo | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 19 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 5 | 14 |
| 4 | Erie Commodores | 10 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 12 | -5 | 7 |
| 5 | Rochester Lancers | 10 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 12 | 24 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -12 | 7 |
| 6 | Syracuse FC | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 18 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 8 | -9 | 6 |
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Des Moines Menace | 12 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 32 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 25 | 33 |
| 2 | Chicago FC United | 12 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 31 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 22 | 29 |
| 3 | St. Louis SG | 12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 24 | 20 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 14 | 4 | 20 |
| 4 | Kaw Valley | 12 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 18 | 31 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 18 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 | -13 | 12 |
| 5 | Green Bay Voyageurs | 11 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 10 | 23 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 17 | -13 | 8 |
| 6 | Peoria | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | Wichita | 11 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 5 | 30 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 14 | -25 | 0 |
