Perhaps a welcome break from league football as Harstad & Senja face off to decide who makes it to next stage of the NM Cup. All the pre-match information is available here!
There has not been much time to rest for the guests, as they played a 2. Division game only three days ago.
Harstad form and stats
Harstad have reached this NM Cup stage through battling and winning against Melbo IL. Harstad participated in NM Cup the last season, where they reached the 2nd round.The Harstad supporters enjoyed the previous match, watching their team host Melbo IL in NM Cup and win 2-0.
Preceding that match was the home 3. Division game against Finnsnes that was lost 1-5.Senja form and stats
The traveling awayteam has defeated Finnsnes in order to reach 2nd round of NM Cup. Last season their NM Cup adventure ended in the 1st round.The loyal fans travelling with their beloved Senja have enjoyed the stadium food more than the matches as the visitors have gone ten consecutive matches without winning on the road. The last time three points were secured away was the Tromsdalen game.
Senja's last game was the home draw against Kongsvinger (3-3). It looked so good for Senja vs Kongsvinger, but the job was not completed and victory was lost as a 3-1 lead was turned into a 3-3 draw. As you can tell from the result, the match against Kongsvinger was as crazy as a clown in a village circus. Great fun for the neutral supporter with 6 goals, will the fun continue today?
Ahead of that match was the victory versus Finnsnes at their stadium, the result 3-0.The schedule is very tough for Senja now as they have to travel again shortly after this match. A 2. Division game at Fløya is waiting in only four days.
Head 2 Head
Last ten meetings between the teams: Harstad won seven, Senja won two and one draw. six games with over 2,5 goals, four matches with two goals or less.Harstad missing players
Senja missing players
| Harstad | Senja | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 13 | Played | P | 13 | 25 | ||
| 8 | 6 | Won | W | 3 | 5 | ||
| 2 | 1 | Drew | D | 0 | 5 | ||
| 15 | 6 | Lost | L | 10 | 15 | ||
| 35 | 22 | Scored | S | 14 | 31 | ||
| 60 | 24 | Conceded | C | 38 | 58 | ||
| 96% | 92% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 96% | ||
| 88% | 85% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 100% | 88% | ||
| 76% | 77% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 92% | 76% | ||
| 60% | 54% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 54% | 48% | ||
| 44% | 38% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 38% | 32% | ||
| 64% | 62% | BTTS | BTTS | 62% | 68% | ||
| 20% | 31% | Clean Sheets | C S | 8% | 12% | ||
| 20% | 15% | Failed to Score | F T | 31% | 24% | ||
| 1.4 | 1.4 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 2.8 | 1.4 | ||
| 1.9 | 1.1 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 7 | 3.5 | ||
| 0.7 | 0.6 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 1.2 | 0.6 | ||
| 1 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | ||
| 3.8 | 2.2 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 7 | 3.5 | ||
| 1.4 | 0.8 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 2.8 | 1.4 | ||
| 93% | 214% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 33% | 85% | ||