Perhaps a welcome break from league football as Halsen & Fram face off to decide who makes it to next stage of the NM Cup. All the pre-match information is available here!
Halsen's stadium, Bergeskogen idrettspark, has a artifical turf surface. Fram have grass on their own stadium. This might or might not make a difference, and to help evaluate that we give you the recent performance numbers for Fram when playing on artifical turf; 5 wins, 7 draws and 6 losses from 18 matches. They have scored {24 goals} in these games and conceded 28.
This is a match between teams from the same area, a local derby. The community is buzzing.
It’s busy days for these teams as both were in action only a few days ago. There’s no rest for the wicked, or in this case; no rest for Halsen and Fram.
Halsen form and stats
Last season, Halsen's NM Cup journey ended in the 1st round.Halsen's previous match was a NM Cup game also played at home, finishing 2-0 vs Fram. The home side are looking to repeat that performance.
A 3. Division - Group 4 defeat was the result before that one, 1-4 away at Vindbjart.Fram form and stats
Last season their NM Cup adventure ended in the 2nd round.Two away games in a row for Fram, who will hope to get a better result in this one after losing 0-2 vs Halsen in the NM Cup.
Preceding that game, the 1-1 draw paying a visit to Ørn Horten.Fram played five friendlies in their break from official games, resulting in 2 victories, 0 draws and 3 defeats. In these five matches Fram scored 6 and conceded {6 goals}.
Head 2 Head
The two sides played each other previously this campaign: Halsen - Fram 2-0. Head-to-head numbers (for the last four meetings): Halsen won one game, one match ended with a draw and Fram managed two wins. Over 2,5 goals / under 2,5 goals: two / two.
Halsen missing players
Fram missing players
| Halsen | Fram | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 12 | Played | P | 13 | 25 | ||
| 7 | 4 | Won | W | 6 | 14 | ||
| 2 | 1 | Drew | D | 3 | 3 | ||
| 16 | 7 | Lost | L | 4 | 8 | ||
| 35 | 18 | Scored | S | 19 | 45 | ||
| 62 | 29 | Conceded | C | 16 | 29 | ||
| 100% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 100% | ||
| 84% | 92% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 85% | 80% | ||
| 68% | 75% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 62% | 56% | ||
| 56% | 50% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 23% | 28% | ||
| 36% | 25% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 12% | ||
| 64% | 67% | BTTS | BTTS | 62% | 48% | ||
| 12% | 17% | Clean Sheets | C S | 23% | 32% | ||
| 24% | 17% | Failed to Score | F T | 15% | 20% | ||
| 2.2 | 2.3 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 4.1 | 4.4 | ||
| 3.7 | 2.6 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 3.6 | 3.4 | ||
| 1.5 | 1.1 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 1.2 | 1.2 | ||
| 2 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | ||
| 4.6 | 3.3 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 9.6 | 9.1 | ||
| 2.4 | 1.9 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 5.4 | 5.1 | ||
| 50% | 77% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 28% | 38% | ||
| 6.7 | 4.6 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 9.7 | 8.8 | ||
| 3.3 | 2.7 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 4.4 | 3.9 | ||
