Perhaps a welcome break from league football as Flint & Fram face off to decide who makes it to next stage of the NM Cup. All the pre-match information is available here!
Fram could be less fresh than the hosts in this fixture, as they played a 2. Division game only three sleeps ago. That game, against Notodden, was also an away game. It's a tiring schedule for Fram.
This pitch has artifical turf, which is not Fram's usual surface at their own ground. When playing on artifical turf Fram have performed like this: Played 39 matches resulting in 9 wins, 9 draws and 21 defeats with the goal stats 57-89 (scored/conceded).
Flint form and stats
Last season, Flint's NM Cup journey ended in the 1st round.The Flint manager might feel some added pressure to get something from this game after two straight home defeats.
A strong away win for Flint against Storm the last match. As mentioned above, Flint "killed" Storm in their previous game. They need to reset completely for this one and beware of complacency.
Preceding that match was a 3. Division defeat to Vindbjart (0-3).Fram form and stats
Last season their NM Cup adventure ended in the quarter-finals.Travelling has not been lucrative for the away team as they have returned home without a win in 14 away games in a row.
There might be some fixture complaints from Fram as they are again playing away from home after losing on the road in their previous match, the 2. Division match against Notodden (1-4).
A 0-2 defeat away at Skeid before that.A new game in only three days for Fram, the 2. Division home match versus Egersund. Busy days.
It's finally time to play a game of importance again as a long period of training has passed. Fram have played a number of friendly games in this period, resulting in 0 wins, 2 draws and 1 defeats from three fixtures.
Head 2 Head
Flint missing players
Fram missing players
| Flint | Fram | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 13 | Played | P | 15 | 25 | ||
| 12 | 7 | Won | W | 0 | 3 | ||
| 3 | 2 | Drew | D | 5 | 7 | ||
| 10 | 4 | Lost | L | 10 | 15 | ||
| 51 | 32 | Scored | S | 17 | 31 | ||
| 55 | 30 | Conceded | C | 44 | 66 | ||
| 100% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 93% | 96% | ||
| 92% | 100% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 87% | 88% | ||
| 84% | 92% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 73% | 76% | ||
| 52% | 62% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 60% | 60% | ||
| 40% | 46% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 40% | 36% | ||
| 68% | 77% | BTTS | BTTS | 60% | 60% | ||
| 12% | 8% | Clean Sheets | C S | 7% | 8% | ||
| 20% | 15% | Failed to Score | F T | 40% | 36% | ||
| 4.3 | 4.2 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 3.6 | 4.6 | ||
| 4.2 | 4.6 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 5.8 | 5.5 | ||
| 1.7 | 1.7 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2.4 | 2.2 | ||
| 3 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 2 | 3 | ||
| 8.2 | 8.9 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 6.7 | 9.7 | ||
| 3.4 | 3.1 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 2.8 | 4.1 | ||
| 57% | 73% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 38% | 30% | ||