National cups are something special for many teams and supporters. Today's match will decide whether it's Njardvík or KFG that keep their silverware dream alive.
Njardvík's stadium has a grass surface. KFG have artifical turf on their own stadium. This might or might not make a difference, and to help evaluate that we give you the recent performance numbers for KFG when playing on grass; 6 wins, 2 draws and 6 losses from 14 matches. They have scored 26 goals in these games and conceded 24.
Njardvík and KFG should both be in good shape for this meeting, as there's been enough days for both of them to train and rest since their last matches.
Njardvík form and stats
Njardvík have not come this way in the Iceland Cup without some hard work on the way, more precisely defeating Fjölnir. Last season their Iceland Cup adventure ended in the 16th finals.The home fans witnessed a 1-1 draw against Fjölnir in the Iceland Cup last time out and are looking for a win here.
Previous to that game, a League Cup B home match hosting Völsungur in a game that was won 1-0.KFG form and stats
The traveling awayteam has defeated Augnablik in order to reach 2nd round of Iceland Cup. KFG was sent out of Iceland Cup in the 1st round last season.The fans enjoyed KFG's previous game versus Augnablik, a Iceland Cup win (4-2) played at home.
A home win before that, celebrating 5-0 vs Kormákur / Hvöt.Head 2 Head
Njardvík missing players
KFG missing players
| Njardvík | KFG | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 16 | Played | P | 11 | 25 | ||
| 13 | 9 | Won | W | 3 | 12 | ||
| 4 | 3 | Drew | D | 5 | 9 | ||
| 8 | 4 | Lost | L | 3 | 4 | ||
| 71 | 56 | Scored | S | 15 | 49 | ||
| 35 | 20 | Conceded | C | 16 | 34 | ||
| 96% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 82% | 88% | ||
| 80% | 81% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 82% | 84% | ||
| 64% | 62% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 73% | 72% | ||
| 64% | 62% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 36% | 48% | ||
| 40% | 50% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 9% | 24% | ||
| 64% | 62% | BTTS | BTTS | 73% | 72% | ||
| 20% | 19% | Clean Sheets | C S | 18% | 24% | ||
| 20% | 19% | Failed to Score | F T | 27% | 16% | ||
| 6.9 | 7.5 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 7.3 | 7.1 | ||
| 5.1 | 4.9 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 6.3 | 6.4 | ||
| 2.3 | 1.9 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 1.3 | 1.9 | ||
| 2 | 1 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | ||
| 12.9 | 14.7 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 9 | 10.8 | ||
| 7.1 | 8.3 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 4.5 | 5.4 | ||
| 41% | 43% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 30% | 37% | ||
| 8.9 | 8.9 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 11.2 | 10.3 | ||
| 4.4 | 4.6 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 5.2 | 4.4 | ||
