Montpellier II saw a 1-0 result facing Canet Roussillon last game, a match to keep in mind. Next up is this resolute Angoulême side.
- Montpellier II have the most conceded goals in the first half (11) in CFA Group D
- Angoulême have played more matches over 2,5 goals away than home.
Both squads have had enough rest since their previous competitive action. Let's agree to expect an energetic fixture!
Montpellier II form and stats
Montpellier II's results here at Stade Bernard Gasset Terrain n°7 in the CFA Group D have been very modest with 1 victory, 3 draws and 6 defeats.
Defensively the home team are doing well, with their goalkeeper Mathis Carvalho not having conceded a league goal in 267 minutes.
It's back home for Montpellier II, who return with a good feeling about themselves after beating Canet Roussillon away with the result 1-0. Bongemba found the net in that victory.
Preceding that game was the home draw versus Nantes II that ended 0-0.The goals haven't exactly been flowing for Montpellier here at Stade Bernard Gasset Terrain n°7 in the league, with less than one goal per game on average (8 from 10 games). It's been trouble in front of goal recently, as only 0 of these goals has been scored in their last three home matches. Defensively it’s touch-and-go for the home team as 16 goals have been conceded.
Angoulême form and stats
4-4-1 is the win-draw-loss statistic for Angoulême in their CFA Group D matches away. The away team travel with confidence. Not since the Le Puy F.43 Auvergne game have they lost an away game, meaning Angoulême has taken points from seven away matches in a row.
406 minutes! That's how long the Angoulême goalkeeper Allan Hunou and his defense have shut out their league opponents.
Angoulême go into this game after a win, the home game against Les Herbiers that ended 1-0.
Before that one, a nice away victory 1-0 at Bourges Foot 18.Angoulême have a decent goal production going in their away games, although not fantastic. In 9 league away games 11 goals have been scored. They concede less than a goal on average per away game (8 so far).
Head 2 Head
The last H2H encounter ended Angoulême - Montpellier 3-2, earlier this season. Last six meetings featuring these participants: Montpellier II won three, Angoulême triumphed in two and we saw one draw. two games with more than 2,5 goals, four matches with two goals or less.Top Goalscorers
  I. Bakayoko 8 goals |  L. Fichten 6 goals | B. Bisson 6 goals |
Montpellier II missing players
Angoulême missing players
| Montpellier II | Angoulême | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 20 | 10 | 3 | Played | P | 5 | 9 | 20 |
| 5 | 1 | 0 | Won | W | 3 | 4 | 11 |
| 4 | 3 | 1 | Drew | D | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| 11 | 6 | 2 | Lost | L | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 19 | 8 | 3 | Scored | S | 9 | 11 | 27 |
| 29 | 16 | 6 | Conceded | C | 5 | 8 | 15 |
| 90% | 80% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 80% | 78% | 85% |
| 75% | 80% | 100% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 80% | 67% | 55% |
| 50% | 50% | 33% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 60% | 33% | 30% |
| 15% | 20% | 33% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 20% | 11% | 20% |
| 10% | 10% | 33% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 20% | 11% | 15% |
| 55% | 50% | 67% | BTTS | BTTS | 60% | 44% | 35% |
| 20% | 30% | 0% | Clean Sheets | C S | 40% | 44% | 50% |
| 35% | 40% | 33% | Failed to Score | F T | 20% | 33% | 30% |
| 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.5 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 5.7 | 5 | 4.2 |
| 3.3 | 2.9 | 2 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 3 | 2.8 | 3.1 |
| 1.5 | 1.1 | 1 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 1.3 | 2 | 1.6 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 9.2 | 10.7 | 6 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 11.3 | 9.8 | 8.6 |
| 3.5 | 4 | 2.5 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 4.3 | 4 | 3.9 |
| 24% | 21% | 40% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 54% | 40% | 39% |
| 9.9 | 10.3 | 10.5 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 7.7 | 10.2 | 9.4 |
| 4.5 | 3.7 | 4.5 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 2.7 | 4 | 3.5 |
- Angoulême have played more matches over 2,5 goals away than home.
- Montpellier II have the most conceded goals in the first half (11) in CFA Group D
- Montpellier II have the most matches over the total-line (6) in CFA Group D
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Angoulême | 20 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 27 | 15 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 7 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 11 | 8 | 12 | 39 |
| 2 | Bergerac | 20 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 23 | 10 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 5 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 13 | 38 |
| 3 | Andrezieux | 21 | 10 | 5 | 6 | 29 | 20 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 16 | 11 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 9 | 9 | 35 |
| 4 | Bourges Foot 18 | 20 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 29 | 18 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 11 | 11 | 34 |
| 5 | Yzeure | 20 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 21 | 16 | 10 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 9 | 5 | 32 |
| 6 | Canet Roussillon | 19 | 9 | 4 | 6 | 18 | 20 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -2 | 31 |
| 7 | Le Puy F.43 Auvergne | 19 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 22 | 14 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 11 | 2 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 11 | 12 | 8 | 30 |
| 8 | Béziers | 20 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 26 | 22 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 21 | 11 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 11 | 4 | 29 |
| 9 | Nantes II | 21 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 26 | 23 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 15 | 13 | 3 | 29 |
| 10 | Trélissac | 20 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 17 | 18 | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 9 | -1 | 24 |
| 11 | Les Herbiers | 20 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 23 | 27 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 14 | 11 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 13 | 13 | -4 | 24 |
| 12 | Angers SCO II | 20 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 20 | 21 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 12 | 14 | -1 | 23 |
| 13 | Chamalières | 20 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 24 | 29 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 15 | -5 | 22 |
| 14 | Colomiers US | 20 | 4 | 8 | 8 | 19 | 27 | 11 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 12 | 15 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 12 | -8 | 20 |
| 15 | Montpellier II | 20 | 5 | 4 | 11 | 19 | 29 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 16 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 11 | 13 | -10 | 19 |
| 16 | Stade Montois | 20 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 14 | 48 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 22 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 26 | -34 | 5 |
