Montpellier II have rested up after their 0-4-fixture vs Angers SCO II and are looking forward to meet Les Herbiers. Get all the information!
- Les Herbiers haven’t played a single 0-0 game at home.
- Montpellier II have the most conceded goals in the first half (7) in CFA Group D
There should be plenty of energy on the pitch in this game, as both sides have had time to recuperate from their last game. Let's hope both teams are ready to give it all.
Les Herbiers form and stats
Les Herbiers have collected 9 points from their CFA Group D home games so far after 3-0-3.
The fans are hoping that Les Herbiers will strike back in this match, putting things right after the 0-1 away loss in the CFA Group D game against Bergerac (placed 1st).
A 2-2 draw away before that, with Angers SCO II the opponent.The Les Herbiers fans would probably like to see some more goals scored at their own stadium in the league, the tally being 7 in 6 matches. With more than 1,5 conceded goals on average, the Herbiers defense is not exactly impregnable. 9 goals conceded from 6 games. You can find more goal stats on the Statistics tab above.
Montpellier II form and stats
The hunting on away grounds haven’t been very fruitful for Montpellier II so far with only 6 points returning home. The records show 2-0-4 (win-draw-lose). Three has not been a lucky number for Montpellier II as they have been defeated three times in a row since the Stade Montois match.
Montpellier II have been frustrated by their lack of goals lately, as they haven't scored in the league since they found the net 180 minutes ago. Bakayoko was the goal scorer.
Montpellier's previous game was their home loss versus Angers SCO II (0-4). As you can see from the result above, the defeat against Angers SCO II was particularly ugly (0-4). The humiliation is still top of mind.
Prior to that match, the Montpellier II manager Garny faced defeat when travelling to Le Puy F.43 Auvergne and losing 0-2.Montpellier II have scored 6 goals on their travels this season, from 6 away games in the league. Montpellier II struggle to build an impenetrable defensive wall in away matches with a total of 9 goals conceded from these games.
Head 2 Head
Top Goalscorers
  I. Bakayoko 8 goals |  A. Payet 5 goals | K. Namnganda 2 goals |
Les Herbiers missing players
Montpellier II missing players
| Les Herbiers | Montpellier II | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 14 | 6 | 1 | Played | P | 1 | 6 | 14 |
| 3 | 3 | 1 | Won | W | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | Drew | D | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 5 | 3 | 0 | Lost | L | 0 | 4 | 9 |
| 15 | 7 | 1 | Scored | S | 2 | 6 | 14 |
| 19 | 9 | 0 | Conceded | C | 1 | 9 | 23 |
| 93% | 100% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 93% |
| 71% | 67% | 0% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 100% | 67% | 79% |
| 36% | 33% | 0% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 100% | 50% | 57% |
| 21% | 17% | 0% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 0% | 17% | 21% |
| 7% | 17% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 17% | 14% |
| 57% | 33% | 0% | BTTS | BTTS | 100% | 50% | 57% |
| 21% | 33% | 100% | Clean Sheets | C S | 0% | 0% | 14% |
| 29% | 33% | 0% | Failed to Score | F T | 0% | 50% | 36% |
| 4.7 | 5.5 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 0 | 4 | 3.7 |
| 4 | 4.5 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 0 | 3 | 2.8 |
| 3.2 | 2.5 | 0 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 0 | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 9 | 9.5 | 0 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 0 | 7.5 | 8.4 |
| 3.2 | 3 | 0 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 0 | 2.8 | 3.1 |
| 16% | 17% | 0% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 0% | 18% | 28% |
| 12.3 | 13 | 0 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 0 | 9 | 10.4 |
| 3.8 | 4 | 0 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 0 | 5.5 | 4.6 |
- Les Herbiers haven’t played a single 0-0 game at home.
- Montpellier II have failed to keep a clean sheet in all their away matches.
- Montpellier II have the most conceded goals in the first half (7) in CFA Group D
- Montpellier II have the most conceded goals in the second half (10) in CFA Group D
- Montpellier II haven’t played a single 0-0 game away.
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Bergerac | 14 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 21 | 9 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 12 | 30 |
| 2 | Yzeure | 14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 14 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 26 |
| 3 | Andrézieux | 14 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 20 | 14 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 25 |
| 4 | Angoulême | 14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 19 | 13 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 25 |
| 5 | Canet Roussillon | 14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 15 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 25 |
| 6 | Le Puy F.43 Auvergne | 14 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 19 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 24 |
| 7 | Bourges Foot 18 | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 18 | 13 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 10 | 9 | 5 | 21 |
| 8 | Nantes II | 14 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 18 | 15 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 10 | 9 | 3 | 21 |
| 9 | Béziers | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 15 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 9 | 1 | 21 |
| 10 | Trelissac | 14 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 11 | 14 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 17 |
| 11 | Chamalières | 14 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 19 | 23 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 13 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 11 | -4 | 17 |
| 12 | Angers SCO II | 14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 17 | 17 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 16 |
| 13 | Les Herbiers | 14 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 15 | 19 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 10 | -4 | 15 |
| 14 | Colomiers US | 14 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 16 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -5 | 14 |
| 15 | Montpellier II | 14 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 9 | -9 | 11 |
| 16 | Stade Montois | 14 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 11 | 34 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 14 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 20 | -23 | 1 |
