CFA Group D: Montpellier II are 10 points behind Béziers, but are set to go full force. Get ready!
- Montpellier II have the most matches over the total-line (3) in CFA Group D
- Béziers is in the best form (4-0-1)
We should expect both teams to be fresh and ready for this match, as there is some time since both teams last played. Let's have a look at how the teams are doing!
Montpellier II form and stats
0-2-3 (win-draw-lost) are the CFA Group D numbers at home for Montpellier II so far this season.
Happy days for Montpellier in their previous game, a CFA Group D match away at Yzeure (placed 5th) that ended with a 2-1 victory.
Preceding that match was a defeat to Trélissac (1-2).Montpellier II have scored 4 league goals here from 5 matches, not a lot. Montpellier have conceded 7 in these home matches.
Béziers form and stats
As the visiting team in CFA Group D matches, Béziers have produced an overall stat of 1-2-2 so far.
Béziers played 1-1 against Les Herbiers in their previous match.
It was a defeat before that one as the away game against Angers SCO II wasn't a success with a 0-2 loss.Goals are few and far between in Béziers's away league games. Only 1 goal from 5 travels. Béziers are defending well in their away games, having conceded only 4 times in 5 matches. For more goal statistics, check out the Statistics tab above.
Head 2 Head
Last two meetings featuring these teams: Montpellier won zero, Béziers were winners in two and we saw zero draws. two games with over 2,5 goals, zero matches with two goals or less.Top Goalscorers
  I. Bakayoko 3 goals |  R. Mayela 3 goals | O. Mendy 2 goals |
Montpellier II missing players
Béziers missing players
| Montpellier II | Béziers | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 9 | 5 | 1 | Played | P | 1 | 5 | 9 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | Won | W | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 2 | 2 | 0 | Drew | D | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| 6 | 3 | 1 | Lost | L | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| 8 | 4 | 1 | Scored | S | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| 13 | 7 | 2 | Conceded | C | 0 | 4 | 8 |
| 89% | 80% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 60% | 78% |
| 67% | 80% | 100% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 0% | 40% | 67% |
| 56% | 60% | 100% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 0% | 0% | 22% |
| 11% | 0% | 0% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 11% |
| 11% | 0% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 11% |
| 67% | 80% | 100% | BTTS | BTTS | 0% | 0% | 33% |
| 11% | 20% | 0% | Clean Sheets | C S | 100% | 60% | 44% |
| 33% | 20% | 0% | Failed to Score | F T | 0% | 80% | 44% |
| 3.6 | 3 | 6 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 0 | 0 | 3.3 |
| 1.4 | 0.5 | 1 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 0 | 0 | 3.7 |
| 1.2 | 0 | 0 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 0 | 0 | 2.3 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 9 | 18 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 0 | 0 | 12.3 |
| 2.8 | 3 | 6 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 0 | 0 | 5.3 |
| 21% | 17% | 17% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 0% | 0% | 44% |
- Béziers have conceded at least twice as many goals as they have scored away.
- Béziers have the fewest scored goals (1) away in CFA Group D
- Béziers have the most scored goals in the first half (5) in CFA Group D
- Béziers have won significantly less corners away then at home.
- Béziers is in the best form (4-0-1)
- Montpellier II have played more matches over 2,5 goals home than away.
- Montpellier II have scored at least twice as many goals at home as Béziers have scored away.
- Montpellier II have the most matches over the total-line (3) in CFA Group D
- Montpellier II have won at least twice as many corners as they have conceded.
- Montpellier II have won significantly less corners at home than away.
- Montpellier II have yet to win a game at home.
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Angoulême | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 14 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 19 |
| 2 | Canet Roussillon | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 18 |
| 3 | Bergerac | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 17 |
| 4 | Andrézieux | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 16 |
| 5 | Yzeure | 9 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 16 |
| 6 | Béziers | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 15 |
| 7 | Le Puy F.43 Auvergne | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 14 |
| 8 | Nantes II | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 11 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 13 |
| 9 | Trélissac | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -1 | 13 |
| 10 | Angers SCO II | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 12 |
| 11 | Bourges Foot 18 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 11 |
| 12 | Colomiers US | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | -1 | 11 |
| 13 | Les Herbiers | 9 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 11 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -2 | 10 |
| 14 | Montpellier II | 9 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 6 | -5 | 5 |
| 15 | Chamalières | 9 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8 | -9 | 5 |
| 16 | Stade Montois | 9 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 7 | 26 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 16 | -19 | 0 |