Only a few games have been played in the Super League so far, with Hebei CFFC placed 7th and Tianjin Teda sitting in the 8th position.
Hebei CFFC and Tianjin Teda should both be in good shape for this meeting, as there's been enough days for both of them to train and rest since their last matches.
Hebei CFFC form and stats
Hebei CFFC are yet to win a home game, having collected 2 points from their first two Super League games here at Suzhou Olympic Sports Centre Stadium. Their last two home games have resulted in two points, meaning they were both draws.
No payout for Hebei in their previous match, an away game at Beijing Guoan that ended in defeat 1-3. Before that, Hebei CFFC drew at home versus Chongqing Dangdai Lifan.
The home team are moderate favourites in this game. How does Hebei CFFC handle that role? We have found five games in our database similar to this one, based on the home odds. The stats for these games are five wins, zero draws and zero defeats.
The match schedule is unforgiving for Hebei as they have a new game in only four days, a Super League match thankfully also at home. Wuhan Zall are visiting.
It's still early days, but we have some goal stats for the Hebei CFFC at home in the league. 4 on target and 4 scored by the opposition; from 2 matches.
Tianjin Teda form and stats
Still no away game victory in the Super League for Tianjin Teda with 1 draw and 1 loss from their first 2 attempts.
Tianjin are travelling again after losing away to Shijiazhuang Ever Bright in their previous match (0-3). A loss against Beijing Guoan was the result prior to that, in a home game.
We have checked recent matches where Tianjin have had similar odds to win. Win-draw-lose statistics from those five games were zero victories, one draw and four defeats.
As for goals scored and conceded in the league games away so far, Tianjin Teda has managed 2 goals and let in 5 from 2 matches.
Head 2 Head
Last eight meetings between the teams: Hebei won five, Tianjin Teda won two and one draw. four games with over 2,5 goals, four matches with two goals or less.Top Goalscorers
  J. Aparecido da Silva 13 goals |  M. Amaral Alves 11 goals |
Hebei CFFC missing players
Tianjin Teda missing players
| Hebei CFFC | Tianjin Teda | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 4 | 2 | 0 | Played | P | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Won | W | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 2 | 0 | Drew | D | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | Lost | L | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 5 | 4 | 0 | Scored | S | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| 11 | 4 | 0 | Conceded | C | 0 | 5 | 11 |
| 100% | 100% | 0% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 100% | 100% | 0% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 100% | 100% | 0% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 100% | 100% | 0% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 0% | 50% | 75% |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 75% | 100% | 0% | BTTS | BTTS | 0% | 50% | 75% |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Clean Sheets | C S | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 25% | 0% | 0% | Failed to Score | F T | 0% | 50% | 25% |
| 3.8 | 4 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 0 | 6 | 5.5 |
| 5 | 7 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 0 | 2.5 | 4.2 |
| 2.5 | 3.5 | 0 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 0 | 2.5 | 1.5 |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 47 | 21 | 0 | Total Shots | T S | 0 | 17 | 36 |
| 15 | 11 | 0 | Shots on Target | S O | 0 | 7 | 11 |
| 33% | 36% | 0% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 0% | 29% | 36% |
- Hebei CFFC has the most conceded goals in the second half (8)
- Tianjin Teda has the the worst goal difference (-7)
- Tianjin Teda is in the worst form (0-1-3)
| Hebei CFFC | Last season | Tianjin Teda | |||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 30 | 15 | Played | P | 15 | 30 | ||
| 9 | 6 | Won | W | 3 | 12 | ||
| 6 | 3 | Drew | D | 2 | 5 | ||
| 15 | 6 | Lost | L | 10 | 13 | ||
| 37 | 21 | Scored | S | 17 | 43 | ||
| 55 | 23 | Conceded | C | 27 | 45 | ||
| 97% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 93% | 97% | ||
| 90% | 87% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 73% | 83% | ||
| 70% | 67% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 67% | 60% | ||
| 30% | 27% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 33% | 23% | ||
| 17% | 13% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 20% | 17% | ||
| 67% | 67% | BTTS | BTTS | 67% | 60% | ||
| 10% | 13% | Clean Sheets | C S | 13% | 23% | ||
| 27% | 20% | Failed to Score | F T | 27% | 20% | ||
| 5.8 | 6.7 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 4.3 | 5.2 | ||
| 3.9 | 2.9 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 5.1 | 5.1 | ||
| 2 | 2 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2.5 | 2.2 | ||
| 2 | 1 | Red cards | R C | 4 | 7 | ||
| 376 | 230 | Total Shots | T S | 156 | 376 | ||
| 116 | 77 | Shots on Target | S O | 54 | 129 | ||
| 32% | 27% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 31% | 33% | ||
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Beijing Guoan | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 12 |
| 2 | Shanghai SIPG | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 10 |
| 3 | Wuhan Zall | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| 4 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 5 |
| 5 | Chongqing Dangdai Lifan | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | -1 | 3 |
| 6 | Qingdao Hainiu | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 3 |
| 7 | Hebei CFFC | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 7 | -6 | 2 |
| 8 | Tianjin Teda | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -7 | 1 |
| Last season | Total | Home | Away | ||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 30 | 23 | 3 | 4 | 68 | 24 | 15 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 28 | 10 | 15 | 13 | 0 | 2 | 40 | 14 | 44 | 72 |
| 2 | Beijing Guoan | 30 | 23 | 1 | 6 | 60 | 26 | 15 | 13 | 0 | 2 | 37 | 16 | 15 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 23 | 10 | 34 | 70 |
| 3 | Shanghai SIPG | 30 | 20 | 6 | 4 | 62 | 26 | 15 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 38 | 13 | 15 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 24 | 13 | 36 | 66 |
| 4 | Jiangsu Suning | 30 | 15 | 8 | 7 | 60 | 41 | 15 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 34 | 14 | 15 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 26 | 27 | 19 | 53 |
| 5 | Shandong Luneng | 30 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 55 | 35 | 15 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 29 | 13 | 15 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 26 | 22 | 20 | 51 |
| 6 | Wuhan Zall | 30 | 12 | 8 | 10 | 41 | 41 | 15 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 19 | 16 | 15 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 22 | 25 | 0 | 44 |
| 7 | Tianjin Teda | 30 | 12 | 5 | 13 | 43 | 45 | 15 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 26 | 18 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 17 | 27 | -2 | 41 |
| 8 | Henan Jianye | 30 | 11 | 8 | 11 | 41 | 46 | 15 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 23 | 18 | 15 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 18 | 28 | -5 | 41 |
| 9 | Dalian Professional | 30 | 10 | 8 | 12 | 44 | 51 | 15 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 23 | 20 | 15 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 21 | 31 | -7 | 38 |
| 10 | Chongqing Dangdai Lifan | 30 | 9 | 9 | 12 | 36 | 47 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 15 | 18 | 15 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 21 | 29 | -11 | 36 |
| 11 | Hebei CFFC | 30 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 37 | 55 | 15 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 21 | 23 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 16 | 32 | -18 | 33 |
| 12 | Guangzhou R&F | 30 | 9 | 5 | 16 | 54 | 72 | 15 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 32 | 32 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 22 | 40 | -18 | 32 |
| 13 | Shanghai Shenhua | 30 | 8 | 6 | 16 | 43 | 57 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 25 | 33 | 15 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 18 | 24 | -14 | 30 |
| 14 | Tianjin Quanjian | 30 | 4 | 13 | 13 | 40 | 53 | 15 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 25 | 26 | 15 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 15 | 27 | -13 | 25 |
| 15 | Shenzhen | 30 | 4 | 9 | 17 | 31 | 57 | 15 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 24 | 23 | 15 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 7 | 34 | -26 | 21 |
| 16 | Beijing Renhe | 30 | 3 | 5 | 22 | 26 | 65 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 17 | 32 | 15 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 9 | 33 | -39 | 14 |
- South China Morning Post - News (in English)