A trophy cabinet can never have too much silverware and both Jinan Xingzhou and Hangzhou know what's at stake in this second leg of the FA Cup Quarter-finals clash.
There’s little time for restitution or working hard at the training pitch these days, with both teams having played their last game less than four days ago.
Jinan Xingzhou form and stats
The club members are hoping that Jinan Xingzhou will fight back in this match, putting things right after the 0-3 away loss in the FA Cup fixture against Hangzhou.
Before that one, a nice away win at Jingchuan Wenhui. A FA Cup match.
Hangzhou form and stats
Hangzhou's mission in FA Cup last season failed in the 1st round.7 wins, 7 draws and 3 losses. That’s the product of Hangzhou playing as the away team in the Super League this season.
The fans enjoyed Hangzhou's previous fixture versus Jinan Xingzhou, a FA Cup win (3-0) played at home.
A home win before that, celebrating 4-0 vs Wuhan Zall.Hangzhou has displayed an ability to score goals in away matches in the league this season, 32 goals from 17 games. As opposed to that, Hangzhou have seen the ball go into their own net 18 times on the road.
Head 2 Head
This isn't the first time these two sides face each other this campaign, as the history books show this recent match: Hangzhou - Jinan Xingzhou 3-0.
Top Goalscorers
![]() F. Andrijašević 1 goals |
Jinan Xingzhou missing players
Hangzhou missing players
| Jinan Xingzhou | Hangzhou | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 18 | 9 | Played | P | 12 | 25 | ||
| 14 | 9 | Won | W | 6 | 15 | ||
| 2 | 0 | Drew | D | 5 | 8 | ||
| 2 | 0 | Lost | L | 1 | 2 | ||
| 33 | 19 | Scored | S | 24 | 53 | ||
| 14 | 4 | Conceded | C | 10 | 19 | ||
| 94% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 92% | 96% | ||
| 67% | 67% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 83% | 92% | ||
| 56% | 56% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 42% | 52% | ||
| 33% | 33% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 25% | 20% | ||
| 11% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 17% | 12% | ||
| 44% | 44% | BTTS | BTTS | 58% | 48% | ||
| 44% | 56% | Clean Sheets | C S | 33% | 44% | ||
| 17% | 0% | Failed to Score | F T | 17% | 12% | ||
| 3.8 | 4.2 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 4.7 | 5.3 | ||
| 3.3 | 3.2 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 4.5 | 4.5 | ||
| 1.5 | 2 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2.1 | 2.2 | ||
| 1 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 4 | ||
| 7.5 | 8.6 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 13.1 | 15.4 | ||
| 3.6 | 4.4 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 5.5 | 6 | ||
| 47% | 45% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 36% | 35% | ||
| 6.6 | 6 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 12 | 10.7 | ||
| 2.8 | 2 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 3.3 | 3.6 | ||
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Wuhan Three Towns | 34 | 25 | 3 | 6 | 91 | 28 | 17 | 12 | 1 | 4 | 55 | 18 | 17 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 36 | 10 | 63 | 78 |
| 2 | Shandong Luneng | 34 | 25 | 3 | 6 | 87 | 29 | 17 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 52 | 7 | 17 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 35 | 22 | 58 | 78 |
| 3 | Chengdu Rongcheng | 34 | 18 | 11 | 5 | 49 | 28 | 17 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 33 | 14 | 17 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 16 | 14 | 21 | 65 |
| 4 | Hangzhou | 33 | 17 | 11 | 5 | 61 | 28 | 16 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 29 | 10 | 17 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 32 | 18 | 33 | 62 |
| 5 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 19 | 5 | 9 | 52 | 25 | 17 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 31 | 10 | 16 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 21 | 15 | 27 | 62 |
| 6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 17 | 7 | 9 | 57 | 46 | 16 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 28 | 19 | 17 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 29 | 27 | 11 | 58 |
| 7 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 16 | 8 | 9 | 57 | 32 | 16 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 31 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 26 | 15 | 25 | 56 |
| 8 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 14 | 7 | 12 | 45 | 39 | 17 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 23 | 17 | 16 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 22 | 22 | 6 | 49 |
| 9 | Meizhou Hakka | 34 | 14 | 7 | 13 | 43 | 41 | 17 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 30 | 18 | 17 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 13 | 23 | 2 | 49 |
| 10 | Shanghai Shenhua | 34 | 14 | 11 | 9 | 42 | 34 | 17 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 19 | 15 | 17 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 23 | 19 | 8 | 47 |
| 11 | Dalian Yifang | 34 | 12 | 9 | 13 | 49 | 53 | 17 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 25 | 25 | 17 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 24 | 28 | -4 | 45 |
| 12 | Changchun Yatai | 34 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 49 | 50 | 17 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 19 | 19 | 17 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 30 | 31 | -1 | 44 |
| 13 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 34 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 47 | 51 | 17 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 13 | 20 | 17 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 34 | 31 | -4 | 44 |
| 14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 9 | 3 | 21 | 29 | 71 | 17 | 5 | 1 | 11 | 13 | 32 | 16 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 16 | 39 | -42 | 30 |
| 15 | Guangzhou R&F | 34 | 6 | 5 | 23 | 32 | 62 | 17 | 3 | 2 | 12 | 16 | 36 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 16 | 26 | -30 | 23 |
| 16 | Wuhan Zall | 34 | 8 | 4 | 22 | 34 | 71 | 17 | 4 | 4 | 9 | 19 | 33 | 17 | 4 | 0 | 13 | 15 | 38 | -37 | 19 |
| 17 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 34 | 3 | 8 | 23 | 24 | 63 | 17 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 17 | 31 | 17 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 7 | 32 | -39 | 17 |
| 18 | Hebei CFFC | 34 | 2 | 0 | 32 | 18 | 115 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 11 | 61 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 7 | 54 | -97 | -3 |
- South China Morning Post - News (in English)