The league table is allowed to rest as Hangzhou and Jinan Xingzhou battle for FA Cup honors in this first Quarter-finals leg of two fixtures.
Hangzhou and Jinan Xingzhou should both be in good shape for this meeting, as there's been enough days for both of them to train and rest since their last matches.
Hangzhou form and stats
Hangzhou was eliminated in the 1st round last season in the FA Cup.The home supporters can't complain about results here at Suzhou Olympic Sports Centre Stadium as Hangzhou have scored 29 goals to get 34 points from 16 games. The overall stats in the Super League are 10-4-2 (wins-draws-losses).
A nice win for Hangzhou last time playing, versus Wuhan Zall. That was also a home game and the match ended 4-0 with Mushekwi, Matheus and Yao scoring for the victors. As mentioned above, Hangzhou "killed" Wuhan Zall in their previous game. They need to reset completely for this one and beware of complacency. Yao (midfield) was the top team player in that game with a rating of 8.43/10. Yao scored one goal, hit two key passes and had 26 successful passes (of 32 total).
Prior to that, an away loss at Wuhan Three Towns in the Super League.The manager Martori will start preparations for the next game as soon this is finished, as the hosts are going to Jinan Xingzhou in only three days.
Hangzhou have proved capable of finding the net in their games here at Suzhou Olympic Sports Centre Stadium with 29 goals in 16 league matches. Hangzhou are not conceding a lot of goals here at Suzhou Olympic Sports Centre Stadium in the league, averaging less than one per game. The total is 10 from 16 matches.
Jinan Xingzhou form and stats
Two away games in a row for Xingzhou, whose manager Tang could celebrate last time after the FA Cup win against Jingchuan Wenhui.
Before that one, the victory at home hosting Changchun Yatai in the FA Cup (1-0).
After this away game Jinan Xingzhou return home for a FA Cup game against Hangzhou. That game is only three sleeps after this.
Head 2 Head
Top Goalscorers
![]() F. Andrijašević 1 goals |
Hangzhou missing players
Jinan Xingzhou missing players
| Hangzhou | Jinan Xingzhou | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 12 | Played | P | 8 | 17 | ||
| 15 | 8 | Won | W | 5 | 14 | ||
| 8 | 3 | Drew | D | 2 | 2 | ||
| 2 | 1 | Lost | L | 1 | 1 | ||
| 52 | 26 | Scored | S | 14 | 33 | ||
| 19 | 9 | Conceded | C | 7 | 11 | ||
| 96% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 88% | 94% | ||
| 92% | 100% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 62% | 65% | ||
| 48% | 58% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 50% | 53% | ||
| 20% | 17% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 38% | 35% | ||
| 12% | 8% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 25% | 12% | ||
| 48% | 42% | BTTS | BTTS | 50% | 47% | ||
| 44% | 50% | Clean Sheets | C S | 38% | 47% | ||
| 12% | 8% | Failed to Score | F T | 25% | 12% | ||
| 5.1 | 5.6 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 3.9 | 4 | ||
| 4.6 | 4.8 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 2.4 | 2.8 | ||
| 2.2 | 2.5 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 1.4 | 1.7 | ||
| 4 | 4 | Red cards | R C | 1 | 1 | ||
| 15 | 16.8 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 7 | 7.7 | ||
| 5.9 | 6.2 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 3.3 | 3.8 | ||
| 35% | 35% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 52% | 49% | ||
| 10.7 | 9.9 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 4.3 | 5 | ||
| 3.5 | 3.9 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 2.1 | 2.1 | ||
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Wuhan Three Towns | 34 | 25 | 3 | 6 | 91 | 28 | 17 | 12 | 1 | 4 | 55 | 18 | 17 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 36 | 10 | 63 | 78 |
| 2 | Shandong Luneng | 34 | 25 | 3 | 6 | 87 | 29 | 17 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 52 | 7 | 17 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 35 | 22 | 58 | 78 |
| 3 | Chengdu Rongcheng | 34 | 18 | 11 | 5 | 49 | 28 | 17 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 33 | 14 | 17 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 16 | 14 | 21 | 65 |
| 4 | Hangzhou | 33 | 17 | 11 | 5 | 61 | 28 | 16 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 29 | 10 | 17 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 32 | 18 | 33 | 62 |
| 5 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 19 | 5 | 9 | 52 | 25 | 17 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 31 | 10 | 16 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 21 | 15 | 27 | 62 |
| 6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 17 | 7 | 9 | 57 | 46 | 16 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 28 | 19 | 17 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 29 | 27 | 11 | 58 |
| 7 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 16 | 8 | 9 | 57 | 32 | 16 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 31 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 26 | 15 | 25 | 56 |
| 8 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 14 | 7 | 12 | 45 | 39 | 17 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 23 | 17 | 16 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 22 | 22 | 6 | 49 |
| 9 | Meizhou Hakka | 34 | 14 | 7 | 13 | 43 | 41 | 17 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 30 | 18 | 17 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 13 | 23 | 2 | 49 |
| 10 | Shanghai Shenhua | 34 | 14 | 11 | 9 | 42 | 34 | 17 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 19 | 15 | 17 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 23 | 19 | 8 | 47 |
| 11 | Dalian Yifang | 34 | 12 | 9 | 13 | 49 | 53 | 17 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 25 | 25 | 17 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 24 | 28 | -4 | 45 |
| 12 | Changchun Yatai | 34 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 49 | 50 | 17 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 19 | 19 | 17 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 30 | 31 | -1 | 44 |
| 13 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 34 | 11 | 11 | 12 | 47 | 51 | 17 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 13 | 20 | 17 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 34 | 31 | -4 | 44 |
| 14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 9 | 3 | 21 | 29 | 71 | 17 | 5 | 1 | 11 | 13 | 32 | 16 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 16 | 39 | -42 | 30 |
| 15 | Guangzhou R&F | 34 | 6 | 5 | 23 | 32 | 62 | 17 | 3 | 2 | 12 | 16 | 36 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 16 | 26 | -30 | 23 |
| 16 | Wuhan Zall | 34 | 8 | 4 | 22 | 34 | 71 | 17 | 4 | 4 | 9 | 19 | 33 | 17 | 4 | 0 | 13 | 15 | 38 | -37 | 19 |
| 17 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 34 | 3 | 8 | 23 | 24 | 63 | 17 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 17 | 31 | 17 | 1 | 3 | 13 | 7 | 32 | -39 | 17 |
| 18 | Hebei CFFC | 34 | 2 | 0 | 32 | 18 | 115 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 11 | 61 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 7 | 54 | -97 | -3 |
- South China Morning Post - News (in English)