Pre-match info: 16 points separate the sides so far, Kematen having done best. Can Kirchbichl shorten the gap?
- Kirchbichl have conceded at least twice as many corners as they have won.
- Kematen have played more matches over 2,5 goals away than home.
Relegation threatens Kirchbichl who should definitely be looking for some points here. Kematen is no longer fighting for a cause; they can neither go up or down this season.
This looks to be an interesting match with lots of fun and energy as both contenders are well revitalized since they last saw competitive action. Bring it on!
Kirchbichl form and stats
The complete Landesliga: Tirol statistics playing at home this season for Kirchbichl are 7-3-4 (wins-draws-losses).
An away draw last time out for Kirchbichl, facing Mils in a game that ended 3-3. A goal frenzy last time out for Kirchbichl, with a total of 6 goals in the match against Mils. Fun stuff to watch!
Ahead of that match, Kirchbichl lost 0-2 at home to Völs.The Kirchbichl fans have had their share of opportunities to cheer home goals this season, having seen 26 goals in 14 league matches. 18 goals have been conceded.
Kematen form and stats
The story so far for the visiting team on their Landesliga: Tirol travels is 7 wins, 0 draws and 7 defeats.
Impressive finishing secured the home win 2-1 against Innsbrucker AC in their previous game.
Preceding that game, the 1-2 loss visiting Volders's place.The travelling fans enjoy Kematen's attacking play in away games, having scored 26 goals in 14 league matches away. It's been trouble in front of goal recently, as only 2 of these goals has been scored in their last three away matches. Kematen have conceded 27 goals in these games.
Head 2 Head
The fixture history shows this score when the sides played each other earlier this season; Kematen - Kirchbichl 2-0. Statistics for the previous five meetings involving these two contenders are: one win for Kirchbichl, zero draws and four wins for Kematen. Over 2,5 goals: three times; under 2,5 goals: two games.Kirchbichl missing players
Kematen missing players
| Kirchbichl | Kematen | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 29 | 14 | 4 | Played | P | 5 | 14 | 29 |
| 10 | 7 | 1 | Won | W | 4 | 7 | 16 |
| 7 | 3 | 2 | Drew | D | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| 12 | 4 | 1 | Lost | L | 1 | 7 | 8 |
| 42 | 26 | 2 | Scored | S | 15 | 26 | 60 |
| 48 | 18 | 3 | Conceded | C | 4 | 27 | 43 |
| 93% | 86% | 50% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 93% |
| 79% | 71% | 50% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 80% | 86% | 83% |
| 59% | 57% | 25% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 80% | 79% | 76% |
| 31% | 36% | 0% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 40% | 43% | 48% |
| 17% | 21% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 40% | 36% | 31% |
| 48% | 43% | 0% | BTTS | BTTS | 60% | 57% | 59% |
| 24% | 36% | 75% | Clean Sheets | C S | 40% | 29% | 34% |
| 34% | 36% | 75% | Failed to Score | F T | 0% | 14% | 14% |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 0 | 2.3 | 3.8 |
| 6 | 6 | 6 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 0 | 4.7 | 4.3 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 0 | 1.3 | 1.7 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | 11 | 11 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 0 | 8 | 10.2 |
| 7 | 7 | 7 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| 29% | 29% | 29% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 0% | 30% | 36% |
| 6 | 6 | 6 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 0 | 14 | 11 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 0 | 5.5 | 3.2 |
- Kematen have played more matches over 2,5 goals away than home.
- Kematen have won significantly less corners away then at home.
- Kematen haven’t played a single 0-0 game away.
- Kirchbichl have conceded at least twice as many corners as they have won.
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Kundl | 29 | 19 | 3 | 7 | 55 | 32 | 15 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 37 | 11 | 14 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 18 | 21 | 23 | 60 |
| 2 | Silz / Mötz | 29 | 17 | 8 | 4 | 81 | 40 | 14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 46 | 22 | 15 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 35 | 18 | 41 | 59 |
| 3 | Mils | 29 | 16 | 6 | 7 | 86 | 46 | 15 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 55 | 23 | 14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 31 | 23 | 40 | 54 |
| 4 | Kematen | 29 | 16 | 5 | 8 | 60 | 43 | 15 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 34 | 16 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 26 | 27 | 17 | 53 |
| 5 | Innsbrucker AC | 29 | 17 | 1 | 11 | 70 | 40 | 14 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 30 | 22 | 15 | 10 | 0 | 5 | 40 | 18 | 30 | 52 |
| 6 | Völs | 30 | 15 | 7 | 8 | 54 | 35 | 15 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 31 | 17 | 15 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 23 | 18 | 19 | 52 |
| 7 | Ebbs | 29 | 14 | 6 | 9 | 54 | 39 | 14 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 33 | 18 | 15 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 21 | 21 | 15 | 48 |
| 8 | Prutz / Serfaus | 29 | 12 | 5 | 12 | 50 | 47 | 15 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 29 | 13 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 21 | 34 | 3 | 41 |
| 9 | Union Innsbruck | 29 | 12 | 5 | 12 | 60 | 66 | 15 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 37 | 24 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 23 | 42 | -6 | 41 |
| 10 | Münster | 29 | 12 | 4 | 13 | 57 | 53 | 15 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 36 | 21 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 21 | 32 | 4 | 40 |
| 11 | St. Johann in Tirol | 29 | 10 | 7 | 12 | 45 | 46 | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 19 | 15 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 25 | 27 | -1 | 37 |
| 12 | Kirchbichl | 29 | 10 | 7 | 12 | 42 | 48 | 14 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 26 | 18 | 15 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 30 | -6 | 37 |
| 13 | Natters | 29 | 11 | 2 | 16 | 42 | 58 | 14 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 23 | 23 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 10 | 19 | 35 | -16 | 35 |
| 14 | Volders | 29 | 8 | 8 | 13 | 37 | 50 | 15 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 20 | 26 | 14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 17 | 24 | -13 | 32 |
| 15 | Zirl | 29 | 4 | 2 | 23 | 18 | 100 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 45 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 10 | 55 | -82 | 14 |
| 16 | Zams | 30 | 1 | 2 | 27 | 14 | 82 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 35 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 7 | 47 | -68 | 5 |