Develop their own match tactics or switch tactics dependant on the opposition? Both SC Bruck an der Mur and Gnas must try something more fresh than in earlier matches. Learn more!
- SC Bruck an der Mur is in the worst form (1-0-4)
- Gnas have played more matches over 2,5 goals away than home.
Both sides have had plentiful rest since their last match. Let's agree to expect an active fixture!
SC Bruck an der Mur form and stats
The story so far in the Landesliga: Steiermark for SC Bruck an der Mur at their home stadium (Murinselstadion) is 5 wins, 1 draw and 4 defeats. When SC Bruck an der Mur hosts teams that live in the bottom of the table (like Liezen, Hitthaller St. Michael, SC Bruck an der Mur, Union RB Weinland Gamlit and Rottenmann), they have won 3 of 4 matches!
SC Bruck an der Mur faced defeat in their previous match, away at Mettersdorf (1-3).
Previous to that game, a home match hosting Rottenmann in a game that was won 3-0.The Bruck manager has got the team scoring with 24 from 10 home games in the league. SC Bruck an der Mur are struggling defensively, conceding on average more than two goals per home game (21 from 10 played).
Gnas form and stats
The hunting on away grounds haven’t been very fruitful for Gnas so far with only 5 points returning home. The records show 1-2-6 (win-draw-lose). With two straight losses from their last two away games, Gnas are hoping that it's time for some travel points again.
Impressive finishing secured the home win 2-1 against Rottenmann in their previous game.
A 0-2 loss hosting TuS Heiligenkreuz before that.Gnas has displayed an ability to score goals in away matches in the league this season, 14 goals from 9 games. For Gnas, more than two goals on average per game end up in their own net.
Head 2 Head
The most recent registered meeting featuring both these contenders is the Gnas - Bruck 3-3 played not long ago this season. Head-2-head stats last five meetings: one - two - two (SC Bruck an der Mur wins - draws - Gnas wins). As for goals, four matches ended with three or more goals (over 2,5), one had two or less.SC Bruck an der Mur missing players
Gnas missing players
| SC Bruck an der Mur | Gnas | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 19 | 10 | 4 | Played | P | 1 | 9 | 19 |
| 6 | 5 | 3 | Won | W | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| 4 | 1 | 0 | Drew | D | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| 9 | 4 | 1 | Lost | L | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| 34 | 24 | 10 | Scored | S | 3 | 14 | 32 |
| 42 | 21 | 4 | Conceded | C | 4 | 22 | 35 |
| 100% | 100% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 100% | 100% | 100% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 100% | 100% | 95% |
| 79% | 90% | 75% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 100% | 78% | 68% |
| 53% | 60% | 25% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 100% | 67% | 47% |
| 37% | 50% | 25% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 100% | 33% | 26% |
| 74% | 80% | 50% | BTTS | BTTS | 100% | 89% | 79% |
| 11% | 10% | 25% | Clean Sheets | C S | 0% | 11% | 11% |
| 16% | 10% | 25% | Failed to Score | F T | 0% | 0% | 11% |
| 5.2 | 5.4 | 11 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 0 | 2 | 2.6 |
| 6 | 6 | 8 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 0 | 5 | 5.8 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 0 | 1.4 | 2 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8.2 | 9.4 | 9 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 0 | 9.8 | 11.3 |
| 3 | 3.6 | 0 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 0 | 3.5 | 4.9 |
| 56% | 56% | 0% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 0% | 43% | 32% |
| 12 | 11.4 | 8 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 0 | 11 | 11.1 |
| 6 | 5.4 | 3 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 0 | 4.8 | 3.9 |
- All of Gnas's away-matches have had more than 1,5 goals.
- All of SC Bruck an der Mur's matches have had more than 1,5 goals.
- Gnas have conceded at least twice as many corners as they have won.
- Gnas have played more matches over 2,5 goals away than home.
- Gnas have scored in all their away matches so far.
- Gnas have won significantly less corners away then at home.
- Gnas haven’t played a single 0-0 game.
- SC Bruck an der Mur have played more matches over 2,5 goals home than away.
- SC Bruck an der Mur haven’t played a single 0-0 game.
- SC Bruck an der Mur is in the worst form (1-0-4)
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Leoben | 19 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 52 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 16 | 9 | 42 | 47 |
| 2 | Voitsberg | 18 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 45 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 30 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 5 | 34 | 46 |
| 3 | Lafnitz II | 19 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 51 | 24 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 31 | 9 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 20 | 15 | 27 | 32 |
| 4 | Mettersdorf | 19 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 36 | 30 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 17 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 13 | 6 | 29 |
| 5 | Frauental | 19 | 9 | 2 | 8 | 32 | 30 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 20 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 24 | 10 | 2 | 29 |
| 6 | Wildon | 19 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 31 | 37 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 16 | 19 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 15 | 18 | -6 | 28 |
| 7 | Furstenfeld | 19 | 8 | 3 | 8 | 30 | 29 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 19 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 19 | 1 | 27 |
| 8 | TuS Heiligenkreuz | 19 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 23 | 29 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 12 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 16 | 17 | -6 | 26 |
| 9 | Ilz | 19 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 28 | 30 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 13 | 15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 15 | 15 | -2 | 25 |
| 10 | Lebring | 19 | 7 | 2 | 10 | 28 | 39 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 17 | 18 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 11 | 21 | -11 | 23 |
| 11 | SC Bruck an der Mur | 19 | 6 | 4 | 9 | 34 | 42 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 24 | 21 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 10 | 21 | -8 | 22 |
| 12 | Gnas | 19 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 32 | 35 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 18 | 13 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 14 | 22 | -3 | 21 |
| 13 | Union RB Weinland Gamlit | 19 | 5 | 4 | 10 | 24 | 36 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 15 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 16 | 21 | -12 | 19 |
| 14 | Rottenmann | 19 | 4 | 6 | 9 | 32 | 36 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 18 | 17 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 14 | 19 | -4 | 18 |
| 15 | Liezen | 19 | 4 | 6 | 9 | 19 | 38 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 11 | 13 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25 | -19 | 18 |
| 16 | Hitthaller St. Michael | 18 | 2 | 4 | 12 | 15 | 56 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 23 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 33 | -41 | 10 |
