A cursory look at the Landesliga: Niederösterreich standings hint of an edge to Retz when they travel to USC Rohrbach. However; let's wait for the game before select a winner!
- USC Rohrbach have played more matches over 2,5 goals home than away.
- Retz have created more than twice as many corners as USC Rohrbach.
Both participants have had a decent time to rest since their previous competitive action. Let's look for an energetic game!
USC Rohrbach form and stats
When playing at home in the Landesliga: Niederösterreich, USC Rohrbach have managed 4 wins, 3 draws and suffered 4 defeats from 11 games.
USC Rohrbach are hoping to put things right at home after a defeat in their previous match, the score 0-2 away versus Scheiblingkirchen.
Preceding that match was a defeat to St. Pölten II (1-3).USC Rohrbach have proved capable of finding the net in their games here at Liese Prokop Sportanlage with 17 goals in 11 league matches. Defensively it’s touch-and-go for the home team as 17 goals have been conceded. When USC Rohrbach hosts teams that live on the top of the table (like Zwettl, Schrems, Mannersdorf and Spratzern), the matches have ended over 2.5 goals 4 of 4 times.
Retz form and stats
4 wins, 3 draws and 4 losses. That’s the product of Retz playing as the away team in the Landesliga: Niederösterreich this season.
Retz are travelling after their nice 1-0 home win in the fixture against Schrems (placed 13th).
Ahead of that match was the victory versus Mannersdorf at their stadium, the result 2-0.Retz find the net regularly in their away games. 16 goals from 11 away fixtures in the league. Retz have conceded 13 goals in these away matches.
Head 2 Head
The newest archived result featuring both these contenders is the Retz - Rohrbach 2-1 played earlier this season. Head-2-head stats last five meetings: two - zero - three (USC Rohrbach wins - draws - Retz wins). As for goals, four matches ended with three or more goals (over 2,5), one had two or less.USC Rohrbach missing players
Retz missing players
| USC Rohrbach | Retz | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 23 | 11 | 4 | Played | P | 4 | 11 | 23 |
| 5 | 4 | 0 | Won | W | 2 | 4 | 13 |
| 7 | 3 | 0 | Drew | D | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 11 | 4 | 4 | Lost | L | 1 | 4 | 6 |
| 24 | 17 | 3 | Scored | S | 6 | 16 | 40 |
| 42 | 17 | 14 | Conceded | C | 3 | 13 | 21 |
| 87% | 91% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 96% |
| 83% | 91% | 100% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 75% | 73% | 65% |
| 52% | 64% | 100% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 25% | 36% | 43% |
| 26% | 27% | 50% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 25% | 27% | 26% |
| 17% | 18% | 25% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 9% | 17% |
| 48% | 55% | 75% | BTTS | BTTS | 25% | 55% | 48% |
| 30% | 36% | 0% | Clean Sheets | C S | 50% | 27% | 39% |
| 35% | 18% | 25% | Failed to Score | F T | 25% | 18% | 17% |
| 2.3 | 0 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 5 | 5 | 5.3 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 4 | 3.6 | 3.6 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2 | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 4.7 | 0 | 0 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 6 | 8.6 | 9 |
| 2.3 | 0 | 0 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 2 | 3.6 | 4.3 |
| 14% | 0% | 0% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 0% | 28% | 27% |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 11 | 11.4 | 10.3 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 5 | 5.4 | 4.4 |
- Retz have created more than twice as many corners as USC Rohrbach.
- Retz haven’t played a single 0-0 game away.
- USC Rohrbach have conceded at least twice as many corners as they have won.
- USC Rohrbach have played more matches over 2,5 goals home than away.
- USC Rohrbach have won significantly less corners at home than away.
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Scheiblingkirchen | 23 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 59 | 15 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 7 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 26 | 8 | 44 | 67 |
| 2 | Krems | 23 | 17 | 5 | 1 | 59 | 18 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 30 | 8 | 12 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 29 | 10 | 41 | 56 |
| 3 | Retz | 23 | 13 | 4 | 6 | 40 | 21 | 12 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 24 | 8 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 16 | 13 | 19 | 43 |
| 4 | Ardagger | 23 | 10 | 9 | 4 | 27 | 13 | 11 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 5 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 12 | 8 | 14 | 39 |
| 5 | St. Pölten II | 23 | 9 | 9 | 5 | 53 | 25 | 12 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 31 | 13 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 22 | 12 | 28 | 36 |
| 6 | Ortmann | 23 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 33 | 32 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 17 | 13 | 12 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 16 | 19 | 1 | 32 |
| 7 | Kottingbrunn | 23 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 24 | 23 | 11 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 6 | 12 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 15 | 17 | 1 | 30 |
| 8 | Waidhofen/Thaya | 24 | 8 | 5 | 11 | 15 | 25 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 15 | -10 | 29 |
| 9 | Kilb | 24 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 30 | 39 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 20 | 20 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 10 | 19 | -9 | 28 |
| 10 | Langenrohr | 23 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 25 | 36 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 12 | 23 | 11 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 13 | 13 | -11 | 26 |
| 11 | Spratzern | 23 | 6 | 5 | 12 | 29 | 47 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 19 | 22 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 10 | 25 | -18 | 23 |
| 12 | USC Rohrbach | 23 | 5 | 7 | 11 | 24 | 42 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 17 | 12 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 25 | -18 | 22 |
| 13 | Schrems | 24 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 26 | 43 | 12 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 16 | 19 | 12 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 10 | 24 | -17 | 20 |
| 14 | Zwettl | 24 | 5 | 5 | 14 | 24 | 47 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 16 | 20 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 27 | -23 | 20 |
| 15 | Mannersdorf | 24 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 14 | 56 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 20 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 9 | 36 | -42 | 9 |
