National cups are something special for many teams and supporters. Today's match will decide whether it's Tire 1922 or Somaspor that keep their silverware dream alive.
Tire 1922 and Somaspor should both be in good shape for this meeting, as there's been enough days for both of them to train and rest since their last matches.
Tire 1922 form and stats
Last season their Turkish Cup adventure ended in the 2nd round.The Tire 1922 fans aren't used to losing league-games here at Buca Arena and will expect new points from this game. Tire 1922 has played 13 games in a row here without a defeat.
As indicated by the result mentioned above, Tire 1922 played a great game against Manisaspor and beat them comfortably. Expectations are high for this one.
Somaspor form and stats
They also participated in Turkish Cup last season. This ended in the 3rd round.Somaspor has drawn their two previous away games.
Head 2 Head
Top Goalscorers
![]() T. Behram 4 goals | ![]() N. Çağlar 4 goals | ![]() C. Menize 3 goals |
Tire 1922 missing players
Somaspor missing players
| Tire 1922 | Somaspor | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 13 | Played | P | 13 | 25 | ||
| 14 | 9 | Won | W | 4 | 11 | ||
| 6 | 4 | Drew | D | 4 | 7 | ||
| 5 | 0 | Lost | L | 5 | 7 | ||
| 48 | 32 | Scored | S | 15 | 36 | ||
| 28 | 8 | Conceded | C | 16 | 25 | ||
| 96% | 92% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 96% | ||
| 80% | 77% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 62% | 68% | ||
| 60% | 54% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 46% | 40% | ||
| 40% | 46% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 23% | 24% | ||
| 16% | 15% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 8% | 12% | ||
| 48% | 46% | BTTS | BTTS | 62% | 52% | ||
| 40% | 54% | Clean Sheets | C S | 15% | 32% | ||
| 16% | 8% | Failed to Score | F T | 23% | 20% | ||
| 0 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2.4 | 2.1 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2.4 | 2.2 | ||
| 1 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 1 | ||
| 129 | 88 | Total Shots | T S | 32 | 106 | ||
| 59 | 36 | Shots on Target | S O | 18 | 60 | ||
| 37% | 44% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 28% | 32% | ||