National cups are something special for many teams and supporters. Today's match will decide whether it's Kastamonuspor or Amed SK that keep their silverware dream alive.
Kastamonuspor and Amed SK should both be in good shape for this meeting, as there's been enough days for both of them to train and rest since their last matches.
It's quite the trip for Amed SK when visiting Kastamonuspor as the cities are 900 kilometers apart.
Kastamonuspor form and stats
Kastamonuspor was eliminated in the 4th round last season in the Turkish Cup.An away draw last time out for Kastamonuspor, facing Serik Belediyespor in a game that ended 1-1.
Amed SK form and stats
They also participated in Turkish Cup last season. This ended in the 4th round.That result followed a home victory 2-1 versus Gumushanespor in the 2. Lig: Beyaz.
Head 2 Head
H2H stats regardless of arena (last ten matches): Kastamonuspor three wins, three draws and Amed SK four victories. As for goals, four matches ended with three or more goals (over 2,5), six games had two or less.Kastamonuspor missing players
Amed SK missing players
| Kastamonuspor | Amed SK | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 12 | Played | P | 13 | 25 | ||
| 10 | 5 | Won | W | 2 | 9 | ||
| 8 | 3 | Drew | D | 0 | 2 | ||
| 7 | 4 | Lost | L | 11 | 14 | ||
| 33 | 13 | Scored | S | 12 | 28 | ||
| 30 | 15 | Conceded | C | 34 | 46 | ||
| 96% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 96% | ||
| 76% | 58% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 85% | 68% | ||
| 36% | 33% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 69% | 60% | ||
| 24% | 17% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 46% | 36% | ||
| 16% | 17% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 46% | 32% | ||
| 56% | 50% | BTTS | BTTS | 31% | 40% | ||
| 32% | 25% | Clean Sheets | C S | 15% | 24% | ||
| 16% | 25% | Failed to Score | F T | 54% | 40% | ||
| 0 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 0 | 0 | ||
| 2.6 | 2.4 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2.3 | 2.3 | ||
| 2 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 1 | 2 | ||
| 121 | 36 | Total Shots | T S | 54 | 70 | ||
| 57 | 21 | Shots on Target | S O | 17 | 24 | ||
| 39% | 29% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 35% | 38% | ||