National cups are something special for many teams and supporters. Today's match will decide whether it's Linlithgow Rose or Civil Service Strollers that keep their silverware dream alive.
Linlithgow Rose and Civil Service Strollers should both be in good shape for this meeting, as there's been enough days for both of them to train and rest since their last matches.
Linlithgow Rose form and stats
Linlithgow have not come this way in the South Challenge Cup without some hard work on the way, more precisely defeating Oakley United.A nice win for Linlithgow Rose last time playing, versus Penicuik Athletic. That was also a home game and the match ended 4-0. As mentioned above, Linlithgow Rose "killed" Penicuik Athletic in their previous game. They need to reset completely for this one and beware of complacency.
In the preceding match a 4-1 victory visiting Tynecastle.Linlithgow Rose have spent many days and weeks preparing for this match, with countless hours on the training pitches and one practice match played. These training games have ended with 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 defeat. Some might be interested in the goal production stats for these matches; Linlithgow scored {0 goals} and let in {6 goals} during these one game.
Civil Service Strollers form and stats
The traveling awayteam has defeated Heriot-Watt University and Edinburgh University in order to reach 3rd round of South Challenge Cup.Civil Service Strollers are travelling after their nice 2-1 home win in the fixture against Cowdenbeath.
Prior to that match, the Civil Service Strollers manager Jardine faced defeat when travelling to Edusport Academy and losing 1-3.Civil Service Strollers played three friendlies in their break from official games, resulting in 1 victory, 2 draws and 0 defeats. In these three matches Strollers scored 6 and conceded {3 goals}.
Head 2 Head
Linlithgow Rose missing players
Civil Service Strollers missing players
| Linlithgow Rose | Civil Service Strollers | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 15 | Played | P | 8 | 25 | ||
| 19 | 13 | Won | W | 4 | 15 | ||
| 2 | 0 | Drew | D | 3 | 6 | ||
| 4 | 2 | Lost | L | 1 | 4 | ||
| 84 | 56 | Scored | S | 21 | 60 | ||
| 31 | 8 | Conceded | C | 10 | 29 | ||
| 100% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 88% | 92% | ||
| 88% | 80% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 88% | 88% | ||
| 80% | 73% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 62% | 72% | ||
| 68% | 53% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 62% | 56% | ||
| 60% | 40% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 25% | 20% | ||
| 56% | 33% | BTTS | BTTS | 62% | 72% | ||
| 36% | 60% | Clean Sheets | C S | 38% | 24% | ||
| 8% | 7% | Failed to Score | F T | 12% | 12% | ||
| 7 | 6 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 3.5 | 4.3 | ||
| 3.8 | 3.5 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 5 | 5.2 | ||
| 2.2 | 2.5 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2.8 | 2.8 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 1 | 1 | ||
| 10.8 | 10 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 10.5 | 11 | ||
| 6.2 | 7 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 4.5 | 5.1 | ||
| 36% | 36% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 33% | 33% | ||
| 8.5 | 5 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 12.2 | 11.2 | ||
| 4.2 | 2 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 5.5 | 5.4 | ||
