Waterhouse welcome Arnett Gardens for another action-packed Premier League match here at Anthony Spaulding Sports Complex.
This is a battle between neighbours, usually meaning increased pressure and importance.
It's no vacation for neither Waterhouse nor Arnett Gardens as both were in action only a few days ago. Expect some tired legs on the pitch and/or possibly some changes to the lineups.
Waterhouse form and stats
Only two Premier League home games for Waterhouse so far, yet both highs and lows with 1 win, 0 draws and 1 defeat.
Waterhouse are anxiously hoping for a goal as it's been 190 minutes since the last one in league fixtures.
Waterhouse's previous game was also a home match, the defeat 0-2 versus Arnett Gardens (placed 4th).
A defeat was the result before that one, 0-1 away at Montego Bay United.The hosts are modest favourites in this match, with the bookmakers estimating the chance of a home win at about 50% +- five percent. It's interesting to look at how Waterhouse have performed under similar circumstances, so here are some numbers: When modest favourites like this (we found 9 games) they have won 7 times, drawn 1 and lost 1.
It's still early days, but we have some goal stats for the Waterhouse at home in the league. 2 on target and 3 scored by the opposition; from 2 matches.
Arnett Gardens form and stats
Arnett Gardens are yet to lose a point on their Premier League travels this season with 2 wins from 2 away games.
Two trips in a row for Gardens, whose coach Davis could celebrate last time after the win against Waterhouse.
Preceding that game was the away victory against Cavalier with the score of 2-1.We have checked recent matches where Arnett Gardens have had similar odds to win. Win-draw-lose statistics from those 5 games were 0 victories, 3 draws and 2 defeats.
It's early days yet, but Arnett Gardens has scored 4 and conceded 1 goals from their travels in the league so far (2 games).
Head 2 Head
The most recent reported match involving both these teams is the Waterhouse - Arnett Gardens 0-2 played previously this season. Last ten meetings featuring these contenders: Waterhouse won four, Arnett Gardens were winners in three and we saw three draws. three games with over 2,5 goals, seven matches with under 2,5 goals.
Waterhouse missing players
Arnett Gardens missing players
| Waterhouse | Arnett Gardens | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 3 | 2 | 0 | Played | P | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | Won | W | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Drew | D | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | Lost | L | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 2 | 0 | Scored | S | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| 4 | 3 | 0 | Conceded | C | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 100% | 100% | 0% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 67% | 100% | 0% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 0% | 100% | 100% |
| 33% | 50% | 0% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 33% | 50% | 0% | BTTS | BTTS | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Clean Sheets | C S | 0% | 50% | 50% |
| 67% | 50% | 0% | Failed to Score | F T | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 | 4 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 0 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| 4 | 4 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| 1.5 | 1.5 | 0 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | 11 | 0 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| 4 | 4 | 0 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| 25% | 25% | 0% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 0% | 40% | 40% |
| 15.5 | 15.5 | 0 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 0 | 9.5 | 9.5 |
| 6.5 | 6.5 | 0 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Waterhouse | Last season | Arnett Gardens | |||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 13 | Played | P | 12 | 24 | ||
| 15 | 8 | Won | W | 4 | 12 | ||
| 5 | 2 | Drew | D | 6 | 8 | ||
| 5 | 3 | Lost | L | 2 | 4 | ||
| 43 | 21 | Scored | S | 18 | 41 | ||
| 24 | 15 | Conceded | C | 15 | 27 | ||
| 100% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 100% | ||
| 76% | 77% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 83% | 83% | ||
| 48% | 54% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 50% | 58% | ||
| 24% | 23% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 25% | 25% | ||
| 16% | 23% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 8% | 8% | ||
| 48% | 62% | BTTS | BTTS | 83% | 75% | ||
| 40% | 23% | Clean Sheets | C S | 8% | 17% | ||
| 12% | 15% | Failed to Score | F T | 8% | 8% | ||
| 4.2 | 4.4 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 5.2 | 4.6 | ||
| 5.1 | 4.8 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 2.8 | 3.5 | ||
| 1 | 1 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2.6 | 2.5 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 1 | 7 | ||
| 11 | 12.5 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 11.1 | 9.2 | ||
| 3.9 | 3.9 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 4.3 | 4.1 | ||
| 46% | 43% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 36% | 42% | ||
| 9.2 | 10.1 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 7.9 | 7.8 | ||
| 3.5 | 3.9 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 3.2 | 3.2 | ||
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Montego Bay United | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 2 | Cavalier | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| 3 | Harbour View | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| 4 | Arnett Gardens | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| 5 | Tivoli Gardens | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 6 | Dunbeholden | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | -1 | 4 |
| 7 | Mount Pleasant Academy | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 8 | Molynes United | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 3 |
| 9 | Waterhouse | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -2 | 3 |
| 10 | Portmore United | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 11 | Humble Lions | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 12 | Jamalco | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3 | 1 |
| 13 | Faulkland | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -3 | 0 |
| 14 | Chapelton | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -8 | 0 |
