Perhaps a welcome break from league football as Delta Calcio Rovigo & Virtus Ciserano Bergamo face off to decide who makes it to next stage of the Coppa Italia Serie D. All the pre-match information is available here!
It’s busy days for these teams as both were in action only a few days ago. There’s no rest for the wicked, or in this case; no rest for Calcio and Virtus Ciserano Bergamo.
Delta Calcio Rovigo form and stats
Last season their Coppa Italia Serie D adventure ended in the 1st round.Two home wins in a row for Delta Calcio Rovigo bring valid hopes of a third.
Calcio shared the glory with Clodiense in their last match, an away game that ended all square 0-0.
Before that game, the 3-2 home victory against Campodarsego.Another home game is coming up fairly shortly for the hosts, as Ambrosiana are coming to town in four days.
Virtus Ciserano Bergamo form and stats
Last season their Coppa Italia Serie D adventure ended in the 1st round.When we have look at the Coppa Italia Serie D statistics, we find 3W-0D-0L. This is both home and away. Ciserano are enjoying a nice run from their away games now, having played seven in a row without losing.
Home advantage was not enough for Ciserano in their previous game, as they lost their Serie D: Girone B-match, hosting Real Calepina, 0-3.
A 2-2 draw at Villa d'Alme's stadium before that.There might be some complaints about the fixture list from the Ciserano manager as the team has another away game coming up in only four days, this time against Caravaggio.
Head 2 Head
Delta Calcio Rovigo missing players
Virtus Ciserano Bergamo missing players
| Delta Calcio Rovigo | Virtus Ciserano Bergamo | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 12 | Played | P | 12 | 25 | ||
| 12 | 6 | Won | W | 4 | 9 | ||
| 5 | 2 | Drew | D | 5 | 8 | ||
| 8 | 4 | Lost | L | 3 | 8 | ||
| 42 | 21 | Scored | S | 17 | 37 | ||
| 25 | 15 | Conceded | C | 16 | 36 | ||
| 92% | 92% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 96% | ||
| 68% | 75% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 83% | 84% | ||
| 52% | 58% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 42% | 52% | ||
| 32% | 42% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 33% | 32% | ||
| 20% | 25% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 17% | 20% | ||
| 44% | 50% | BTTS | BTTS | 75% | 68% | ||
| 40% | 33% | Clean Sheets | C S | 17% | 16% | ||
| 24% | 25% | Failed to Score | F T | 8% | 20% | ||
| 4 | 3.6 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 5.5 | 6.1 | ||
| 5.3 | 5.4 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 5.1 | 5.5 | ||
| 2.5 | 2.2 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2.4 | 2.3 | ||
| 2 | 1 | Red cards | R C | 1 | 2 | ||
| 10.3 | 10.8 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 10.5 | 11.2 | ||
| 4.7 | 4 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 3.1 | 3.7 | ||
| 25% | 25% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 48% | 39% | ||
| 12.3 | 14.6 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 10.4 | 11 | ||
| 3.7 | 4.2 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 4.9 | 4.9 | ||