Perhaps a welcome break from league football as Kafr Qasim & Hapoel Ramat Gan face off to decide who makes it to next stage of the Toto Cup Ligat Leumit. All the pre-match information is available here!
There’s little time for restitution or working hard at the training pitch these days, with both teams having played their last game less than four days ago.
Kafr Qasim form and stats
Qasim have not come this way in the Toto Cup Ligat Leumit without some hard work on the way, more precisely defeating Maccabi Kabilio Jaffa, Hapoel Ramat HaSharon and Agudat Sport Ashdod. Kafr Qasim was eliminated in the 9th-12th place play-offs last season in the Toto Cup Ligat Leumit.Kafr Qasim are returning here after guesting Agudat Sport Ashdod in a Toto Cup Ligat Leumit game and winning with a 1-0 scoreline.
Erik lost again
Hapoel Ramat Gan form and stats
The traveling awayteam has defeated Ironi Tiberias, Hapoel Kfar Saba and Hapoel Afula in order to reach 5th-8th place play-offs of Toto Cup Ligat Leumit. Last season their Toto Cup Ligat Leumit adventure ended in the semi-finals.Ramat delivered a 0-0 draw playing at home against Hapoel Kfar Saba in their previous match; a Toto Cup Ligat Leumit duel.
Head 2 Head
H2H stats regardless of arena (last eight matches): Kafr Qasim two wins, two draws and Hapoel Ramat Gan four victories. As for goals, two matches ended with three or more goals (over 2,5), six games had two or less.
Kafr Qasim missing players
Hapoel Ramat Gan missing players
| Kafr Qasim | Hapoel Ramat Gan | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 14 | Played | P | 13 | 25 | ||
| 11 | 6 | Won | W | 5 | 8 | ||
| 8 | 5 | Drew | D | 4 | 11 | ||
| 6 | 3 | Lost | L | 4 | 6 | ||
| 35 | 20 | Scored | S | 17 | 27 | ||
| 24 | 14 | Conceded | C | 14 | 22 | ||
| 100% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 85% | 72% | ||
| 80% | 79% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 62% | 56% | ||
| 40% | 43% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 38% | 28% | ||
| 12% | 14% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 23% | 20% | ||
| 4% | 7% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 15% | 12% | ||
| 56% | 64% | BTTS | BTTS | 38% | 36% | ||
| 28% | 21% | Clean Sheets | C S | 38% | 52% | ||
| 16% | 14% | Failed to Score | F T | 38% | 40% | ||
| 4.3 | 3.8 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 3.7 | 3.4 | ||
| 4.2 | 4.1 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 4.2 | 3.6 | ||
| 2.5 | 2.9 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 1.7 | 1.6 | ||
| 2 | 1 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | ||
| 11 | 11.6 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 8 | 7.6 | ||
| 4.6 | 4.6 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 4.5 | 3.6 | ||
| 31% | 31% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 29% | 30% | ||
| 7.6 | 6.9 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 9.5 | 7.7 | ||
| 3 | 2.9 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 3.4 | 3 | ||
