National cups are something special for many teams and supporters. Today's match will decide whether it's Maccabi Shaarayim or Hapoel Qalansawe that keep their silverware dream alive.
Maccabi Shaarayim and Hapoel Qalansawe should both be in good shape for this meeting, as there's been enough days for both of them to train and rest since their last matches.
Maccabi Shaarayim form and stats
Last season their State Cup adventure ended in the round of 16.Maccabi Shaarayim's previous match was also a home event, the defeat 0-1 vs Hapoel Qalansawe (in State Cup).
Preceding that match was a Liga Alef - Süd defeat to Holon Yermiyahu (0-1).The bookmakers consider this a fairly even contest. One could say only the home advantage separates the teams. It could be relevant to look at how Shaarayim have performed in matches similar to this (as small favourites). Our database has found 4 matches with the results: Won 1, drawn 1 and lost 2.
Hapoel Qalansawe form and stats
Last season their State Cup adventure ended in the 3rd round.Home advantage was not enough for Hapoel Qalansawe in their previous game as they lost hosting Hapoel Kaukab, 0-2.
Before that, the State Cup win away at Maccabi Shaarayim.
Head 2 Head
Maccabi Shaarayim and Hapoel Qalansawe have faced each other before this season: Maccabi Shaarayim - Hapoel Qalansawe 0-1. Head-2-head stats last two meetings: one - zero - one (Maccabi Shaarayim wins - draws - Hapoel Qalansawe wins). As for goals, one match ended with three or more goals (over 2,5), one had two or less.
Maccabi Shaarayim missing players
Hapoel Qalansawe missing players
| Maccabi Shaarayim | Hapoel Qalansawe | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 14 | Played | P | 12 | 25 | ||
| 8 | 6 | Won | W | 7 | 13 | ||
| 6 | 4 | Drew | D | 2 | 6 | ||
| 11 | 4 | Lost | L | 3 | 6 | ||
| 21 | 15 | Scored | S | 21 | 45 | ||
| 31 | 12 | Conceded | C | 11 | 21 | ||
| 84% | 86% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 92% | 88% | ||
| 60% | 50% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 58% | 72% | ||
| 36% | 29% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 50% | 52% | ||
| 20% | 21% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 17% | 20% | ||
| 8% | 7% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 17% | 12% | ||
| 28% | 29% | BTTS | BTTS | 42% | 40% | ||
| 36% | 43% | Clean Sheets | C S | 42% | 48% | ||
| 52% | 43% | Failed to Score | F T | 25% | 24% | ||
| 4.4 | 4.3 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 4 | 3.7 | ||
| 3.6 | 3.4 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 2.1 | 3.4 | ||
| 1.9 | 1.7 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 1.9 | 2.2 | ||
| 2 | 1 | Red cards | R C | 1 | 2 | ||
| 10.2 | 10 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 14.9 | 11.1 | ||
| 4.3 | 4.4 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 6.6 | 4.8 | ||
| 19% | 24% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 30% | 32% | ||
| 8.1 | 5.9 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 7.8 | 7.8 | ||
| 3.9 | 2.8 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 3.6 | 3.5 | ||
