Perhaps a welcome break from league football as St Josephs FC & College Cosmo face off to decide who makes it to next stage of the Gibraltar Cup. All the pre-match information is available here!
It’s busy days for these teams as both were in action only a few days ago. There’s no rest for the wicked, or in this case; no rest for St Josephs FC and College Cosmo.
St Josephs FC form and stats
St Josephs FC was eliminated in the quarter-finals last season in the Gibraltar Cup. A Premier Division defeat was the result before that one, 0-1 away at Magpies.St Josephs FC are huge favourites in this match and it would be a big surprise if they fail to leave Victoria Stadium with a victory. The home side has been in this situation before, with huge expectations of a win. In their match history 40 earlier games are comparable to this one, and St Josephs FC has won 26 times, drawn six and lost eight. Sports bettors who like handicap betting will like to know that St Josephs FC has won by at least two goals 21 times when in this position.
College Cosmo form and stats
College's mission in Gibraltar Cup last season failed in the quarter-finals. Prior to that match, the College Cosmo manager Espinosa faced defeat when travelling to Europa Point and losing 1-2.College Cosmo are huge outsiders in this game. Running a check in our games database we found 22 matches where they were as big outsiders as an away team. Results were one win, three draws and 18 defeats. Of the defeats, 15 games were lost by at least two goals margin.
Head 2 Head
Head-2-head stats last three meetings: three - zero - zero (Josephs wins - draws - College Cosmo wins). As for goals, three matches ended with three or more goals (over 2,5), zero had two or less. Boro likes to face College Cosmo and have scored 3 goals in these encounters.St Josephs FC missing players
College Cosmo missing players
| St Josephs FC | College Cosmo | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 13 | Played | P | 14 | 25 | ||
| 13 | 6 | Won | W | 3 | 7 | ||
| 4 | 3 | Drew | D | 3 | 4 | ||
| 8 | 4 | Lost | L | 8 | 14 | ||
| 60 | 35 | Scored | S | 16 | 25 | ||
| 31 | 17 | Conceded | C | 26 | 47 | ||
| 96% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 93% | 92% | ||
| 84% | 85% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 86% | 80% | ||
| 64% | 69% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 57% | 48% | ||
| 52% | 62% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 29% | 24% | ||
| 40% | 46% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 21% | 20% | ||
| 56% | 69% | BTTS | BTTS | 29% | 28% | ||
| 32% | 15% | Clean Sheets | C S | 29% | 28% | ||
| 16% | 15% | Failed to Score | F T | 50% | 52% | ||
| 5.2 | 5.9 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 2.3 | 2.3 | ||
| 3 | 3.5 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 6.3 | 5.8 | ||
| 2.6 | 2.5 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2.1 | 3 | ||
| 5 | 2 | Red cards | R C | 2 | 2 | ||
| 11.2 | 9.7 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 6.6 | 5.9 | ||
| 5 | 4.7 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 2.9 | 2.5 | ||
| 39% | 38% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 25% | 21% | ||
| 8.3 | 8.6 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 13.4 | 13.9 | ||
| 3.8 | 3.9 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 5.3 | 5.8 | ||
