Ligue 2: Top-notch vs below average, at least that's what the table says. Grenoble Foot 38 - Pau. Home victory or a surprise result?
- Pau have won significantly less corners away then at home.
There have been limited time to rest for the hosting team, as they performed in a Coupe de France match only three days earlier. At least it's nice to return home after that away game at Vierzon FC.
Grenoble Foot 38 form and stats
Grenoble Foot 38 have played 11 Ligue 2 games at their own stadium so far this season, resulting in 6-2-3 (wins-draws-losses).
Nothing to worry about in defence for Grenoble Foot 38, as their goalkeeper Brice Maubleu has completely shut out the opponents for 180 minutes in the Ligue 2.
Grenoble are returning here after visiting Vierzon FC in a Coupe de France game and winning with a 1-0 scoreline.
A strong away win before that one, visiting Nîmes and winning 2-0.It should be added that a glance at the 11 latest league matches shows that 10 of them qualified as a both teams not to score result (only one or none of the teams scored).
From these home matches, Grenoble Foot 38 have conceded only 8 goals.
Pau form and stats
The visitors are W3-D3-L5 on the road this term. That's in the Ligue 2.
Home advantage was not enough for Pau in their previous game as they lost hosting Bordeaux, 0-2.
Prior to that result Pau won their away game at Paris. The scoreline was 1-0.The attacking power of Pau when travelling is not overwhelming with 9 goals scored from 11 league matches away. Pau have conceded 13 goals in these away matches.
Head 2 Head
Grenoble Foot 38 have not lost in the last 8 fixtures (4-4-0) versus Pau.Pau - Grenoble 0-0 was the scoreline in these squads' previous h2h fixture, played this season.
Top Goalscorers
  A. Sanyang 5 goals |  M. Phaeton 5 goals |   M. Bassouamina 5 goals |
Grenoble Foot 38 missing players
Pau missing players
| Grenoble Foot 38 | Pau | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 22 | 11 | 3 | Played | P | 4 | 11 | 22 |
| 10 | 6 | 2 | Won | W | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| 6 | 2 | 1 | Drew | D | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| 6 | 3 | 0 | Lost | L | 2 | 5 | 8 |
| 23 | 11 | 6 | Scored | S | 2 | 9 | 19 |
| 18 | 8 | 4 | Conceded | C | 4 | 13 | 26 |
| 77% | 82% | 67% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 91% |
| 41% | 27% | 67% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 50% | 64% | 59% |
| 32% | 27% | 67% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 0% | 27% | 36% |
| 18% | 18% | 67% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 0% | 9% | 18% |
| 14% | 18% | 67% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 23% | 27% | 67% | BTTS | BTTS | 50% | 45% | 41% |
| 55% | 55% | 33% | Clean Sheets | C S | 0% | 27% | 32% |
| 45% | 36% | 33% | Failed to Score | F T | 50% | 27% | 36% |
| 3.8 | 4 | 3.7 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 2.2 | 3.6 | 4.5 |
| 4.4 | 4.7 | 5.7 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 6.8 | 5.4 | 4.5 |
| 2.1 | 1.8 | 0.3 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2 | 2.3 | 2 |
| 3 | 2 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7.3 | 8.3 | 7.3 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 6.2 | 6.5 | 8.5 |
| 3.1 | 3.5 | 4 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 2.5 | 2.8 | 3.4 |
| 34% | 28% | 50% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 20% | 29% | 26% |
| 10.1 | 10.9 | 11.7 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 14.2 | 12.4 | 10.3 |
| 4.2 | 4.1 | 5.7 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 5.8 | 4.9 | 4.3 |
- Pau have won significantly less corners away then at home.
- Pau haven’t played a single 0-0 game away.
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Le Havre | 22 | 13 | 8 | 1 | 32 | 9 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 16 | 4 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 16 | 5 | 23 | 47 |
| 2 | Sochaux | 22 | 12 | 3 | 7 | 36 | 20 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 21 | 8 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 15 | 12 | 16 | 39 |
| 3 | Bordeaux | 22 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 31 | 16 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 15 | 7 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 9 | 15 | 39 |
| 4 | Metz | 22 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 35 | 24 | 11 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 16 | 11 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 19 | 13 | 11 | 36 |
| 5 | Grenoble Foot 38 | 22 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 23 | 18 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 8 | 11 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 12 | 10 | 5 | 36 |
| 6 | Bastia | 22 | 10 | 4 | 8 | 22 | 24 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 6 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 18 | -2 | 34 |
| 7 | Amiens SC | 22 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 26 | 24 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 10 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 13 | 14 | 2 | 33 |
| 8 | Caen | 22 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 26 | 23 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 17 | 7 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 16 | 3 | 32 |
| 9 | Quevilly Rouen | 22 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 27 | 25 | 11 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 19 | 13 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 12 | 2 | 31 |
| 10 | Valenciennes | 22 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 21 | 24 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 13 | -3 | 29 |
| 11 | Annecy | 22 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 24 | 22 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 9 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 14 | 13 | 2 | 28 |
| 12 | Paris | 22 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 18 | 23 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 14 | 12 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 10 | 9 | -5 | 28 |
| 13 | Guingamp | 22 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 26 | 31 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 14 | -5 | 27 |
| 14 | Laval | 22 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 27 | 34 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 16 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 18 | -7 | 27 |
| 15 | Pau | 22 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 19 | 26 | 11 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 13 | -7 | 26 |
| 16 | Nîmes | 22 | 6 | 4 | 12 | 22 | 33 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 12 | 21 | -11 | 22 |
| 17 | Dijon | 22 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 21 | 27 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 14 | 14 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 21 |
| 18 | Saint-Etienne | 22 | 6 | 6 | 10 | 31 | 38 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 17 | 19 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 14 | 19 | -7 | 21 |
| 19 | Rodez | 22 | 4 | 8 | 10 | 19 | 29 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 9 | 18 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 11 | -10 | 20 |
| 20 | Niort | 22 | 5 | 5 | 12 | 19 | 35 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 9 | 17 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 10 | 18 | -16 | 20 |
