Pre-match info: 14 points are between the teams so far, Andrézieux having performed best. Can Trélissac shorten the gap?
- Trélissac have played more matches over 2,5 goals home than away.
- Andrézieux have the the best goal difference (+6) away in CFA Group D
Trélissac and Andrézieux should both be in good shape for this meeting, as there's been enough days for both of them to train and rest since their last matches.
Trélissac form and stats
When playing at home in the CFA Group D, Trélissac have managed 3 wins, 4 draws and suffered 4 defeats from 11 games.
The followers are hoping that Trélissac will strike back in this fixture, putting things right after the 1-2 away loss in the match against Chamalieres (placed 13th).
Previous to that game, a home match hosting Montpellier II in a game that was won 3-0.From these home matches, Trélissac have conceded only 9 goals. There's been improvement defensively lately, as only 1 of these goals has been conceded in their last three home matches.
Andrézieux form and stats
5-3-3 is the win-draw-loss statistic for Andrézieux in their CFA Group D matches away.
236 minutes! That's how long the Andrézieux goalkeeper Matthieu Pichot and his defense have shut out their league opponents.
Andrézieux go into this game after a win, the home game against Angoulême that ended 1-0. Which player has scored four games in a row for the away side? The answer is Diallo and that is solid stuff!
Ahead of that match was the victory versus Canet Roussillon at their stadium, the result 2-0.Andrézieux have scored 15 goals on their travels this season, from 11 away games in the league. Andrézieux are defending well in their away games, having conceded only 9 times in 11 matches. For more goal statistics, check out the Statistics tab above.
Head 2 Head
Andrézieux - Trélissac 0-1 was the end result in these squads' latest head to head match, played this season. Previous five meetings between these squads: Trélissac won two, Andrézieux were winners in two and we saw one draw. one game with over 2,5 goals, four matches with two goals or less. The matches between these sides have had a tendency to be "violent", having seen 4 sending-offs from the last five encounters.Top Goalscorers
  A. Diallo 16 goals | E. Mathieu 5 goals |  S. Dutard 4 goals |
Trélissac missing players
Andrézieux missing players
| Trélissac | Andrézieux | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 23 | 11 | 2 | Played | P | 4 | 11 | 23 |
| 7 | 3 | 0 | Won | W | 3 | 5 | 12 |
| 6 | 4 | 0 | Drew | D | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| 10 | 4 | 2 | Lost | L | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| 21 | 11 | 1 | Scored | S | 10 | 15 | 32 |
| 22 | 9 | 3 | Conceded | C | 5 | 9 | 20 |
| 83% | 73% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 82% | 87% |
| 61% | 55% | 50% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 100% | 64% | 61% |
| 35% | 36% | 50% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 75% | 36% | 43% |
| 9% | 18% | 0% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 50% | 18% | 22% |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 25% | 9% | 9% |
| 35% | 36% | 50% | BTTS | BTTS | 75% | 36% | 48% |
| 35% | 36% | 0% | Clean Sheets | C S | 25% | 45% | 35% |
| 48% | 55% | 50% | Failed to Score | F T | 0% | 36% | 30% |
| 4.7 | 0 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 2 | 5.5 | 5.1 |
| 4.1 | 0 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 3 | 3.5 | 3.3 |
| 1.6 | 0 | 0 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 1 | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 10.6 | 0 | 0 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 7 | 10 | 12.8 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 3 | 3.2 | 5 |
| 26% | 0% | 0% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 67% | 15% | 24% |
| 13.4 | 0 | 0 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 5 | 7.2 | 9.7 |
| 5.1 | 0 | 0 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 1 | 3.2 | 3.7 |
- Andrézieux have the the best goal difference (+6) away in CFA Group D
- Trélissac have played more matches over 2,5 goals home than away.
- Trélissac have won significantly less corners at home than away.
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Bergerac | 24 | 13 | 8 | 3 | 28 | 12 | 12 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 16 | 5 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 12 | 7 | 16 | 47 |
| 2 | Angoulême | 23 | 12 | 7 | 4 | 29 | 16 | 12 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 11 | 9 | 13 | 43 |
| 3 | Andrézieux | 23 | 12 | 5 | 6 | 32 | 20 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 9 | 12 | 41 |
| 4 | Le Puy F.43 Auvergne | 23 | 11 | 7 | 5 | 27 | 15 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 40 |
| 5 | Bourges Foot 18 | 24 | 11 | 5 | 8 | 33 | 22 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 12 | 11 | 38 |
| 6 | Canet Roussillon | 22 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 21 | 24 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 13 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 11 | -3 | 35 |
| 7 | Yzeure | 24 | 8 | 10 | 6 | 24 | 22 | 12 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 34 |
| 8 | Nantes II | 23 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 28 | 26 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 15 | 15 | 2 | 32 |
| 9 | Béziers | 23 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 27 | 25 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 22 | 12 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 13 | 2 | 31 |
| 10 | Les Herbiers | 23 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 26 | 27 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 14 | 12 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 14 | 13 | -1 | 31 |
| 11 | Angers SCO II | 24 | 6 | 11 | 7 | 23 | 23 | 11 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 9 | 8 | 13 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 14 | 15 | 0 | 29 |
| 12 | Trélissac | 23 | 7 | 6 | 10 | 21 | 22 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 11 | 9 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 13 | -1 | 27 |
| 13 | Chamalieres | 24 | 7 | 6 | 11 | 26 | 32 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 18 | 15 | 12 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 17 | -6 | 27 |
| 14 | Montpellier II | 23 | 6 | 5 | 12 | 23 | 34 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 11 | 16 | -11 | 23 |
| 15 | Colomiers US | 23 | 4 | 8 | 11 | 22 | 33 | 12 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 14 | 18 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 15 | -11 | 20 |
| 16 | Stade Montois | 23 | 1 | 3 | 19 | 14 | 51 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 23 | 12 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 8 | 28 | -37 | 6 |
