Chamalières got a 0-2 result vs Canet Roussillon in their previous week, a fixture to learn from. Next is this firm Angoulême side.
- Chamalières have the most conceded goals in the second half (6) in CFA Group D
- Angoulême have the most scored goals (12) in CFA Group D
Both teams should be fairly well rested for this game, as they have had some quiet days to prepare. Hopefully this will translate into lots of action on the pitch.
Chamalières's stadium, Complexe Sportif Claude Wolff, has a artifical turf surface. Angoulême have grass on their own stadium. This might or might not make a difference, and to help evaluate that we give you the recent performance numbers for Angoulême when playing on artifical turf; 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss from one match. They have scored 1 goal in these games and conceded 2.
Chamalières form and stats
When playing at home in the CFA Group D, Chamalières have managed 0 wins, 2 draws and suffered 2 defeats from 4 games.
Chamalières faced defeat in their previous match, away at Canet Roussillon (0-2).
Before that, Chamalières drew at home versus Nantes II.Chamalières are certainly not overdoing their scoring at home in league matches, having created 4 goals in 4 games. With more than 1,5 conceded goals on average, the Chamalières defense is not exactly impregnable. 7 goals conceded from 4 games. You can find more goal stats on the Statistics tab above.
Angoulême form and stats
Angoulême have six points from their first three away games in the CFA Group D, meaning two victories and a loss.
Impressive finishing secured the home win 3-2 against Montpellier II in their previous game.
Prior to that result Angoulême won their away game at Les Herbiers. The scoreline was 2-1.Angoulême find the net regularly in their away games. 4 goals from 3 away fixtures in the league. Angoulême have conceded 3 goals in these away matches.
Head 2 Head
Statistics for the former two meetings featuring these two contenders are: one win for Chamalières, one draw and zero wins for Angoulême. Over 2,5 goals: one time; under 2,5 goals: one game.Top Goalscorers
  L. Fichten 3 goals | J. Lobo 3 goals |  C. Bitsamou 2 goals |
Chamalières missing players
Angoulême missing players
| Chamalières | Angoulême | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 7 | 4 | 1 | Played | P | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | Won | W | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| 2 | 2 | 0 | Drew | D | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | Lost | L | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 6 | 4 | 0 | Scored | S | 2 | 4 | 12 |
| 12 | 7 | 1 | Conceded | C | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| 100% | 100% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 86% |
| 86% | 75% | 0% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 100% | 100% | 71% |
| 43% | 50% | 0% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 0% | 33% | 43% |
| 29% | 50% | 0% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 29% |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 14% |
| 57% | 75% | 0% | BTTS | BTTS | 0% | 33% | 29% |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Clean Sheets | C S | 100% | 33% | 57% |
| 43% | 25% | 100% | Failed to Score | F T | 0% | 33% | 29% |
| 3 | 3 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 7 | 5.7 | 5 |
| 4 | 2 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 0 | 4 | 3.8 |
| 0.5 | 0 | 0 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 1 | 1.7 | 1.5 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 5.5 | 8 | 0 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 16 | 11.3 | 10.2 |
| 1.5 | 3 | 0 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 5 | 4 | 3.8 |
| 33% | 33% | 0% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 40% | 33% | 47% |
- All of Angoulême's away-matches have had more than 1,5 goals.
- Angoulême have scored at least twice as many goals as they have conceded.
- Angoulême have the most scored goals (12) in CFA Group D
- Angoulême have the the best goal difference (+7) in CFA Group D
- Chamalières have failed to keep a clean sheet in all their matches.
- Chamalières have played more matches over 2,5 goals home than away.
- Chamalières have the most conceded goals (7) at home in CFA Group D
- Chamalières have the most conceded goals in the second half (6) in CFA Group D
- Chamalières have yet to win a game at home.
- Chamalières haven’t played a single 0-0 game.
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Angoulême | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 16 |
| 2 | Canet Roussillon | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 14 |
| 3 | Béziers | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 14 |
| 4 | Bergerac | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 13 |
| 5 | Yzeure | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 13 |
| 6 | Andrézieux | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 12 |
| 7 | Colomiers US | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 11 |
| 8 | Le Puy F.43 Auvergne | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 11 |
| 9 | Les Herbiers | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 9 |
| 10 | Nantes II | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| 11 | Bourges Foot 18 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 8 |
| 12 | Trélissac | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | -4 | 7 |
| 13 | Angers SCO II | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | -5 | 5 |
| 14 | Chamalières | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -6 | 5 |
| 15 | Montpellier II | 7 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | -5 | 2 |
| 16 | Stade Montois | 7 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 12 | -11 | 0 |