Welcome to Stade de Campréal and this fixture between Bergerac & Angers SCO II in the CFA Group D. Here's all you must know!
- Bergerac have the the best goal difference (+9) in CFA Group D
- Angers SCO II have played more matches over 2,5 goals away than home.
Both teams have had sufficient rest since their last exertion in an official match. Let's have faith in that this will be an in-your-face fixture!
Bergerac form and stats
The story so far in the CFA Group D for Bergerac at their home stadium (Stade de Campréal) is 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 defeat.
A strong away win for Bergerac against Montlucon the last match, as S. Mohamed Bakir were on target. World class coaching! That was the thoughts of E. Lannuzel when S. Mohamed Bakir scored the winning goal after coming on as a substitute in the 66th minute.
In the preceding match a 3-0 victory visiting Canet Roussillon.The Bergerac fans have had their share of opportunities to cheer home goals this season, having seen 9 goals in 5 league matches. Bergerac have only conceded 4 from their league home games. For more goal stats, check the Statistics tab above.
Angers SCO II form and stats
The hunting on away grounds haven’t been very fruitful for Angers SCO II so far with only 5 points returning home. The records show 1-2-3 (win-draw-lose).
Angers SCO II have been frustrated by their lack of goals lately, as they haven't scored in the league since they found the net 182 minutes ago. Ayoub Yousfi was the goal scorer.
Angers SCO II are travelling again after losing away to Le Puy F.43 Auvergne in their previous match (0-1).
A loss against Bourges Foot 18 was the result prior to that, in a home game.The visiting Angers have scored more than one goal per away game in the league so far. The grand total is 6 goals from 6 games. As for defending, Angers SCO II rarely keep clean sheets as they have conceded 9 goals from these away matches.
Head 2 Head
Top Goalscorers
  P. Maisonneuve 5 goals |  F. Magri 4 goals | A. Santos Sahibeddine 3 goals |
Bergerac missing players
Angers SCO II missing players
| Bergerac | Angers SCO II | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 11 | 5 | 1 | Played | P | 3 | 6 | 11 |
| 6 | 3 | 1 | Won | W | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 3 | 1 | 0 | Drew | D | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | Lost | L | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 17 | 9 | 3 | Scored | S | 0 | 6 | 10 |
| 8 | 4 | 0 | Conceded | C | 5 | 9 | 13 |
| 91% | 100% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 67% | 83% | 82% |
| 64% | 80% | 100% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 33% | 67% | 64% |
| 45% | 60% | 100% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 33% | 50% | 36% |
| 18% | 20% | 0% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 33% | 50% | 27% |
| 9% | 0% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 36% | 40% | 0% | BTTS | BTTS | 0% | 33% | 18% |
| 55% | 40% | 100% | Clean Sheets | C S | 33% | 33% | 45% |
| 18% | 20% | 0% | Failed to Score | F T | 100% | 50% | 55% |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 8 | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 5 | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 3 | 2.3 | 2.2 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9.5 | 0 | 0 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 14 | 12 | 11.2 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 5 | 5 | 4.8 |
| 33% | 0% | 0% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 0% | 13% | 11% |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 10 | 10.7 | 9 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 4 | 4.3 | 3.8 |
- Angers SCO II have created more than twice as many corners as Bergerac.
- Angers SCO II have played more matches over 2,5 goals away than home.
- Bergerac have played more matches over 2,5 goals home than away.
- Bergerac have scored at least twice as many goals as they have conceded.
- Bergerac have the the best goal difference (+9) in CFA Group D
- Bergerac have won significantly less corners at home than away.
- Bergerac haven’t played a single 0-0 game at home.
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Bergerac | 11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 17 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 9 | 21 |
| 2 | Angoulême | 11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 18 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 21 |
| 3 | Canet Roussillon | 11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 21 |
| 4 | Yzeure | 11 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 19 |
| 5 | Le Puy F.43 Auvergne | 11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 18 |
| 6 | Trélissac | 11 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 17 |
| 7 | Andrezieux | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 14 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 16 |
| 8 | Bourges Foot 18 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 12 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 15 |
| 9 | Beziers | 11 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 | -2 | 15 |
| 10 | Nantes II | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 13 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 2 | 14 |
| 11 | Les Herbiers | 11 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 13 | 14 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 14 |
| 12 | Colomiers US | 11 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 11 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | -1 | 13 |
| 13 | Angers SCO II | 11 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 10 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 12 |
| 14 | Montpellier II | 11 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 12 | 14 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 7 | -2 | 11 |
| 15 | Chamalières | 11 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -5 | 11 |
| 16 | Stade Montois | 11 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 8 | 29 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 17 | -21 | 0 |