Flashy Chasselay MDA visit Rumilly Vallieres after their 1-1-result versus Martigues. Check out our thorough preview!
Insights:
- Rumilly Vallieres have played more matches over 2,5 goals home than away.
- Chasselay MDA have the most scored goals (21) in CFA Group C
This should be an engaging fixture with lots of spark and excitement as both squads are well recovered since they last ran out on the pitch. Bring it on!
Rumilly Vallieres form and stats
Rumilly Vallieres have played 5 CFA Group C games at their own stadium so far this season, resulting in 2-1-2 (wins-draws-losses).
Vallieres faced defeat in their previous match, away at Fréjus St-Raphaël (0-1).
Before that game, the 1-0 home victory against Saint-Priest.Rumilly Vallieres has scored 5 league goals at home this season, in 5 matches. Rumilly Vallieres have conceded 6 in these home matches.
Chasselay MDA form and stats
As the visiting team in CFA Group C matches, Chasselay MDA have produced an overall stat of 2-1-2 so far.
Chasselay's last game was the home draw against Martigues (1-1).
Preceding that game was the away victory against Monaco II with the score of 2-0.Chasselay have a decent goal production going in their away games, although not fantastic. In 5 league away games 5 goals have been scored. Chasselay have conceded 5 goals in these away matches.
Head 2 Head
Top Goalscorers
  G. Odru 4 goals |  E. Quarshie 4 goals | K. Bennekrouf 4 goals |
Rumilly Vallieres missing players
Chasselay MDA missing players
| Rumilly Vallieres | Chasselay MDA | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 12 | 5 | 1 | Played | P | 1 | 5 | 12 |
| 4 | 2 | 0 | Won | W | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| 3 | 1 | 0 | Drew | D | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | Lost | L | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| 12 | 5 | 0 | Scored | S | 1 | 5 | 21 |
| 14 | 6 | 2 | Conceded | C | 1 | 5 | 9 |
| 92% | 100% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 75% | 80% | 100% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 100% | 80% | 83% |
| 33% | 40% | 0% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 0% | 20% | 33% |
| 17% | 0% | 0% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 0% | 0% | 17% |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 0% | 0% | 8% |
| 42% | 60% | 0% | BTTS | BTTS | 100% | 40% | 42% |
| 33% | 20% | 0% | Clean Sheets | C S | 0% | 40% | 50% |
| 33% | 20% | 100% | Failed to Score | F T | 0% | 20% | 8% |
| 4.8 | 6.6 | 9 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| 4.5 | 3.6 | 3 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 1.4 | 1 | 2 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10.3 | 12.6 | 7 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| 5 | 6.2 | 0 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 20% | 16% | 0% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 0% | 0% | 67% |
| 11 | 11.2 | 14 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 5.1 | 5.6 | 5 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 0 | 0 | 2 |
- Chasselay MDA have scored at least twice as many goals as they have conceded.
- Chasselay MDA have the fewest conceded goals in the second half (2) in CFA Group C
- Chasselay MDA have the fewest matches over the total-line (1) in CFA Group C
- Chasselay MDA have the fewest matches under the total-line (0) in CFA Group C
- Chasselay MDA have the most scored goals (21) in CFA Group C
- Chasselay MDA have the most scored goals in the first half (7) in CFA Group C
- Chasselay MDA have the the best goal difference (+12) in CFA Group C
- Chasselay MDA have won at least twice as many corners as they have conceded.
- Chasselay MDA have won significantly less corners away then at home.
- Chasselay MDA haven’t played a single 0-0 game.
- Chasselay MDA is in the best form (4-2-0) in CFA Group C
- Rumilly Vallieres have played more matches over 2,5 goals home than away.
- Rumilly Vallieres have won significantly more corners at home than away.
- Rumilly Vallieres haven’t played a single 0-0 game at home.
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Chasselay MDA | 12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 21 | 9 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 16 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 12 | 24 |
| 2 | Grasse | 12 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 23 |
| 3 | Aubagne | 11 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 20 | 14 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 10 | 6 | 20 |
| 4 | Louhans-Cuiseaux | 12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 20 |
| 5 | Olympique Lyonnais II | 12 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 15 | 14 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 9 | 1 | 19 |
| 6 | Fréjus St-Raphaël | 11 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 16 |
| 7 | Toulon | 12 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 15 |
| 8 | Lyon Duchere | 12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 15 | 16 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 13 | 9 | -1 | 15 |
| 9 | Rumilly Vallieres | 12 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 12 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 8 | -2 | 15 |
| 10 | Hyères | 12 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 11 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 14 |
| 11 | Monaco II | 12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 13 | 17 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 14 |
| 12 | Martigues | 11 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 9 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | -4 | 14 |
| 13 | Jura Sud Foot | 11 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 15 | 16 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 7 | -1 | 13 |
| 14 | Marignane Gignac | 11 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 15 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 10 | -4 | 11 |
| 15 | Saint-Priest | 11 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 11 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 7 | -5 | 10 |
| 16 | Olympique Marseille II | 12 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 11 | 20 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -9 | 10 |