A glance at the CFA Group B table shows that this is top- against mid-table, but there's a lot more data to take in. Check out our St Maur Lusitanos - Olympique St Quentin guide!
- St Maur Lusitanos have played more matches over 2,5 goals home than away.
- Olympique St Quentin have the most dropped points from leading position (14) in CFA Group B
St Maur Lusitanos are staying put; they can neither be promoted or relegated this season and are fighting only for positions. Olympique is no longer fighting for a cause; they can neither go up or down this season.
This has all the signs of an engaging match with lots of fun and excitement as both teams are well refreshed since they last ran out on the pitch. Let's start!
St Maur Lusitanos form and stats
5 victories, 6 draws and 3 defeats. That’s what St Maur Lusitanos have to build on here at Stade Adolphe-Chéron in the CFA Group B. St Maur Lusitanos are slowly digging their own grave here at Stade Adolphe-Chéron with the depressing streak of not having won a home league game in eight attempts. The last victory here came in the Haguenau match.
The Lusitanos coach Zizi and his side return home after a 2-2 draw away versus Bobigny (placed 4th).
Preceding that match was a defeat to Gobelins (1-2).The bookmakers consider this a fairly even contest. One could say only the home advantage separates the teams. It could be relevant to look at how St Maur Lusitanos have performed in matches similar to this (as small favourites). Our database has found 8 matches with the results: Won 3, drawn 2 and lost 3.
The St Maur Lusitanos fans would probably like to see some more goals scored at their own stadium in the league, the tally being 17 in 14 matches. It's been trouble in front of goal recently, as only 2 of these goals has been scored in their last three home matches. Lusitanos are not conceding a lot of goals here at Stade Adolphe-Chéron in the league, averaging less than one per game. The total is 10 from 14 matches.
Olympique St Quentin form and stats
The visitors are W5-D4-L5 on the road this term. That's in the CFA Group B.
Olympique St Quentin might have something to prove in this game as they lost at home in their previous match. Fleury 91 proved too strong as Olympique St Quentin slumped to a 0-2 defeat in front of their own fans at Stade Paul Debrésie.
Before that one, a nice away victory 2-1 at Lens II.As mentioned above, this is an open game with no clear favourite. We have found 5 similar matches played by Olympique in our archives, and the results are: 1 win for Olympique St Quentin, 1 draw and 3 defeats.
Olympique St Quentin are scoring more than one goal per away game on average, having accumulated 15 away goals from 14 games (in the league). As opposed to that, Olympique have seen the ball go into their own net 16 times on the road.
Head 2 Head
St Maur Lusitanos and Olympique St Quentin have played each other earlier this season: Olympique St Quentin - St Maur Lusitanos 2-2. Head-2-head stats last four meetings: three - one - zero (St Maur Lusitanos wins - draws - Olympique St Quentin wins). As for goals, two matches ended with three or more goals (over 2,5), two had two or less.Top Goalscorers
  F. Betra 10 goals |  T. Averlant 6 goals | A. El Farissi 6 goals |
St Maur Lusitanos missing players
Olympique St Quentin missing players
| St Maur Lusitanos | Olympique St Quentin | ||||||
| Total | Home | vs | Statistics | Stat | vs | Away | Total |
| 29 | 14 | 4 | Played | P | 4 | 14 | 29 |
| 11 | 5 | 1 | Won | W | 1 | 5 | 8 |
| 13 | 6 | 2 | Drew | D | 0 | 4 | 11 |
| 5 | 3 | 1 | Lost | L | 3 | 5 | 10 |
| 30 | 17 | 5 | Scored | S | 3 | 15 | 34 |
| 20 | 10 | 4 | Conceded | C | 6 | 16 | 37 |
| 76% | 79% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 93% | 93% |
| 52% | 64% | 75% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 50% | 57% | 72% |
| 28% | 36% | 25% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 25% | 36% | 45% |
| 17% | 14% | 25% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 25% | 29% | 28% |
| 0% | 0% | 0% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 25% | 7% | 7% |
| 34% | 43% | 50% | BTTS | BTTS | 25% | 50% | 55% |
| 55% | 50% | 25% | Clean Sheets | C S | 25% | 29% | 28% |
| 34% | 29% | 25% | Failed to Score | F T | 50% | 29% | 24% |
| 3.9 | 3.9 | 4.5 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 2.5 | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| 3.8 | 2.8 | 1.5 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 5.5 | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| 1.6 | 2 | 2 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8.3 | 8.7 | 7 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 8 | 9 | 9 |
| 3.9 | 4.2 | 2.5 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 2.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| 27% | 33% | 40% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 30% | 25% | 25% |
| 8.9 | 7.9 | 10.5 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 11.8 | 12.8 | 12.8 |
| 4.2 | 3.4 | 4.5 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 5.5 | 6.5 | 6.5 |
- Olympique St Quentin have the fewest matches over the total-line (1) in CFA Group B
- Olympique St Quentin have the most dropped points from leading position (14) in CFA Group B
- St Maur Lusitanos have played more matches over 2,5 goals home than away.
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | Gobelins | 29 | 19 | 6 | 4 | 39 | 17 | 15 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 17 | 4 | 14 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 22 | 13 | 22 | 63 |
| 2 | Fleury 91 | 29 | 19 | 5 | 5 | 49 | 23 | 14 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 22 | 7 | 15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 27 | 16 | 26 | 62 |
| 3 | Beauvais | 29 | 15 | 6 | 8 | 28 | 25 | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 14 | 15 | 15 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 10 | 3 | 51 |
| 4 | Bobigny | 29 | 12 | 12 | 5 | 42 | 35 | 15 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 24 | 19 | 14 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 18 | 16 | 7 | 48 |
| 5 | St Maur Lusitanos | 29 | 11 | 13 | 5 | 30 | 20 | 14 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 17 | 10 | 15 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 13 | 10 | 10 | 46 |
| 6 | Épinal | 29 | 12 | 8 | 9 | 46 | 31 | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 22 | 9 | 15 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 24 | 22 | 15 | 44 |
| 7 | Auxerre II | 29 | 12 | 6 | 11 | 33 | 32 | 15 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 24 | 18 | 14 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 9 | 14 | 1 | 42 |
| 8 | Reims II | 29 | 10 | 7 | 12 | 40 | 39 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 21 | 18 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 19 | 21 | 1 | 37 |
| 9 | Olympique St Quentin | 29 | 8 | 11 | 10 | 34 | 37 | 15 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 19 | 21 | 14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 15 | 16 | -3 | 35 |
| 10 | Sainte Geneviève | 29 | 8 | 11 | 10 | 29 | 32 | 15 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 17 | 21 | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 12 | 11 | -3 | 35 |
| 11 | Haguenau | 29 | 9 | 7 | 13 | 44 | 50 | 15 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 26 | 22 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 18 | 28 | -6 | 34 |
| 12 | Belfort | 29 | 8 | 7 | 14 | 30 | 41 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 12 | 18 | 15 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 18 | 23 | -11 | 31 |
| 13 | Schiltigheim | 29 | 5 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 32 | 14 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 13 | 11 | 15 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 11 | 21 | -8 | 28 |
| 14 | Metz II | 29 | 7 | 7 | 15 | 28 | 39 | 14 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 12 | 17 | 15 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 22 | -11 | 28 |
| 15 | Lens II | 29 | 4 | 12 | 13 | 26 | 41 | 15 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 15 | 24 | 14 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 11 | 17 | -15 | 24 |
| 16 | Entente SSG | 29 | 6 | 3 | 20 | 17 | 45 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 24 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 21 | -28 | 21 |
