Perhaps a welcome break from league football as PEPO & Gnistan face off to decide who makes it to next stage of the Ykköscup. All the pre-match information is available here!
This football pitch has grass, which is not Gnistan's usual surface at their own football pitch. When playing on grass Gnistan have performed like this: Played 19 matches taking 6 wins, 6 draws and 7 defeats with the goal stats 30-33 (scored/conceded).
PEPO form and stats
PEPO's last game was hosting MiPK and winning 5-2.
Gnistan form and stats
Gnistan play their second straight away game, having lost the previous one 0-2 to EIF.
A 1-4 loss hosting VPS before that.Head 2 Head
As for the last seven games between these two teams, there's one PEPO victory, two draws and four Gnistan wins. Over/under statistics; four of these games ended with three goals or more, three matches with two goals or less.Top Goalscorers
  D. de Almeida Caé da Conceição 14 goals |  N. Veikkanen 13 goals | S. St. Prix 9 goals |
PEPO missing players
Gnistan missing players
| PEPO | Gnistan | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 14 | Played | P | 13 | 25 | ||
| 16 | 10 | Won | W | 6 | 10 | ||
| 4 | 2 | Drew | D | 1 | 2 | ||
| 5 | 2 | Lost | L | 6 | 13 | ||
| 58 | 33 | Scored | S | 24 | 35 | ||
| 28 | 16 | Conceded | C | 23 | 41 | ||
| 100% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 96% | ||
| 84% | 93% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 100% | 84% | ||
| 60% | 64% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 69% | 60% | ||
| 40% | 43% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 38% | 28% | ||
| 28% | 36% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 31% | 24% | ||
| 56% | 57% | BTTS | BTTS | 54% | 44% | ||
| 32% | 29% | Clean Sheets | C S | 15% | 24% | ||
| 12% | 14% | Failed to Score | F T | 31% | 36% | ||
| 5.8 | 5.8 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 4.3 | 4.5 | ||
| 3.9 | 3.8 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 5.5 | 4.6 | ||
| 1.4 | 1.1 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 2.8 | 2.9 | ||
| 1 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 2 | 2 | ||
| 12 | 11.5 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 8.8 | 9.4 | ||
| 5.7 | 6 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 3.8 | 3.8 | ||
| 40% | 39% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 48% | 36% | ||
| 8.7 | 8.3 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 13.5 | 12.4 | ||
| 4 | 3.5 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 5.8 | 5.3 | ||
