National cups are something special for many teams and supporters. Today's match will decide whether it's Huima or TuPS that keep their silverware dream alive.
Both teams have had enough rest since their last effort on the pitch. Let's agree to expect an animated match!
D L L L L
Huima form and stats
Action has already taken place for Huima in Finland Cup as they have defeated Kajo to reach the 2nd Round.Huima's struggle is real here with only 9 points collected from 13 Kakkonen-LohkoB games. The win-draw-lost numbers are ugly: 2-3-8.
The Huima manager and his side return home after a 1-1 draw away versus Kajo in the Finland Cup.
Prior to that was the away defeat visiting Sinimustat (1-6).Huima have scored 11 league goals here from 13 matches, not a lot. Huima are struggling defensively, conceding on average more than two goals per home game (27 from 13 played).
W W W D D
TuPS form and stats
The traveling awayteam has defeated MYPA in order to reach 2nd round of Finland Cup.The club members enjoyed TuPS's previous match versus MYPA, a Finland Cup win (1-0) played at home.
Before that one, a nice away victory 1-0 at RiPS.Head 2 Head
Huima missing players
TuPS missing players
| Huima | TuPS | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 12 | Played | P | 12 | 25 | ||
| 4 | 2 | Won | W | 3 | 8 | ||
| 7 | 3 | Drew | D | 1 | 3 | ||
| 14 | 7 | Lost | L | 8 | 14 | ||
| 24 | 11 | Scored | S | 14 | 39 | ||
| 64 | 24 | Conceded | C | 40 | 76 | ||
| 96% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 100% | 100% | ||
| 76% | 75% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 92% | 92% | ||
| 52% | 50% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 92% | 80% | ||
| 36% | 25% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 67% | 68% | ||
| 28% | 17% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 42% | 56% | ||
| 56% | 58% | BTTS | BTTS | 58% | 68% | ||
| 12% | 0% | Clean Sheets | C S | 8% | 12% | ||
| 36% | 42% | Failed to Score | F T | 33% | 20% | ||
| 0 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 4.5 | 4.7 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 5.1 | 5.7 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 1.6 | 1.6 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 1 | 3 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 7.4 | 10.7 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 2.9 | 3.8 | ||
| 0% | 0% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 41% | 43% | ||
| 0 | 0 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 17.8 | 16.6 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 9 | 8.2 | ||
| Total | Home | Away | |||||||||||||||||||
| # | Team | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | MP | W | D | L | F | A | +/- | P |
| 1 | PoPa | 26 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 88 | 28 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 60 | 15 | 13 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 28 | 13 | 60 | 64 |
| 2 | LoPa | 26 | 18 | 2 | 6 | 54 | 24 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 4 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 22 | 20 | 30 | 56 |
| 3 | KaaPo | 26 | 18 | 2 | 6 | 55 | 33 | 13 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 37 | 16 | 13 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 18 | 17 | 22 | 56 |
| 4 | PP-70 | 26 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 44 | 28 | 13 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 23 | 12 | 13 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 21 | 16 | 16 | 47 |
| 5 | Ilves | 26 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 40 | 24 | 13 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 23 | 6 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 17 | 18 | 16 | 44 |
| 6 | P-Iirot | 26 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 46 | 38 | 13 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 25 | 15 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 21 | 23 | 8 | 41 |
| 7 | SalPa | 25 | 11 | 5 | 9 | 43 | 29 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 29 | 12 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 14 | 17 | 14 | 38 |
| 8 | ÅIFK | 26 | 11 | 4 | 11 | 48 | 33 | 13 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 25 | 14 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 23 | 19 | 15 | 37 |
| 9 | Espoo | 26 | 10 | 4 | 12 | 56 | 58 | 13 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 26 | 27 | 13 | 6 | 0 | 7 | 30 | 31 | -2 | 34 |
| 10 | EIF | 25 | 8 | 5 | 12 | 33 | 48 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 21 | 27 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 12 | 21 | -15 | 29 |
| 11 | Sinimustat | 26 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 45 | 38 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 23 | 13 | 13 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 22 | 25 | 7 | 27 |
| 12 | Huima | 26 | 4 | 6 | 16 | 24 | 68 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 13 | 41 | -44 | 18 |
| 13 | IFFK Palsbole | 26 | 5 | 2 | 19 | 23 | 66 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 31 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 9 | 13 | 35 | -43 | 17 |
| 14 | FJK Forssa | 26 | 2 | 2 | 22 | 16 | 100 | 13 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 6 | 45 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 11 | 10 | 55 | -84 | 8 |
