National cups are something special for many teams and supporters. Today's match will decide whether it's Cockfosters or Barking that keep their silverware dream alive.
It's no vacation for neither Cockfosters nor Barking as both were in action only a few days ago. Expect some tired legs on the pitch and/or possibly some changes to the lineups.
Cockfosters form and stats
Cockfosters have reached this London Senior Cup stage through battling and winning against Harrow Borough. Last season, Cockfosters's London Senior Cup journey ended in the 2nd round.Cockfosters are returning here after visiting Risborough Rangers and winning with a 1-0 scoreline.
Preceding that game was the home draw versus Leverstock Green that ended 1-1.Cockfosters are traveling soon after this match as the Counties Leagues: Spartan South Midlands match at Tring Athletic awaits in four days.
Barking form and stats
The traveling awayteam has defeated AFC Croydon Athletic in order to reach 2nd round of London Senior Cup. Barking's mission in London Senior Cup last season failed in the semi-finals.It might be tough going out on the road again for Barking, facing their second straight away game. Especially as the previous game, ended with a defeat 0-4 versus Redbridge. Barking lost the plot completely in their previous game, as mentioned above. They need to recover quickly from that 0-4 beating and focus on this one.
Before that one, a nice away victory 4-2 at Halstead Town.There might be some complaints about the fixture list from the Barking manager as the team has another away game coming up in only three days, this time against Romford.
Head 2 Head
Cockfosters missing players
Barking missing players
| Cockfosters | Barking | ||||||
| Total | Home | Statistics | Stat | Away | Total | ||
| 25 | 12 | Played | P | 13 | 25 | ||
| 9 | 4 | Won | W | 6 | 12 | ||
| 10 | 5 | Drew | D | 2 | 4 | ||
| 6 | 3 | Lost | L | 5 | 9 | ||
| 44 | 23 | Scored | S | 25 | 49 | ||
| 34 | 17 | Conceded | C | 28 | 44 | ||
| 96% | 100% | Over 0.5 | O 0.5 | 92% | 96% | ||
| 88% | 92% | Over 1.5 | O 1.5 | 92% | 84% | ||
| 44% | 42% | Over 2.5 | O 2.5 | 85% | 76% | ||
| 36% | 33% | Over 3.5 | O 3.5 | 85% | 64% | ||
| 20% | 25% | Over 4.5 | O 4.5 | 23% | 24% | ||
| 64% | 75% | BTTS | BTTS | 54% | 52% | ||
| 24% | 8% | Clean Sheets | C S | 15% | 24% | ||
| 16% | 17% | Failed to Score | F T | 38% | 28% | ||
| 0 | 0 | Corners for (avg) | C F | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Corners against (avg) | C A | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Yellow cards (avg) | Y C | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Red cards | R C | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Shots (avg) | S ( | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Shots on Target (avg) | S O | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0% | 0% | Goal Efficiency | G E | 0% | 0% | ||
| 0 | 0 | Shots against (avg) | S A | 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | Shots on Target against (avg) | S O | 0 | 0 | ||
